Skip to main content

First of all, the framing of the bill as a "bailout" is one explanation for it's defeat yesterday.  As was the arrogance inherent in the original three page bill, that was not even given the title of "draft proposal."

This diary is premised on the need for passing a bill to insert liquidity into the credit markets, with all of the caveats, potential adverse affects and moral hazards that have been written on extensively.

Here are my suggestions, recieved with agreement in comments on several diaries, with a suggestion for comments on them, and offering of others.  

1- Paulson should never have given himself the authority to dispense funds.  He defined the goal and means, and must allow Congress to select the individual, or small group, to execute it.  The oversight committees in the final bill were to evaluate purchases after the fact, which is not acceptable.  

2- Bush must set up a DOJ-FBI special task force to investigate, and if warranted prosecute those who broke the law,   This would dissipate some of the anger against those whose irresponsibility brought this crisis about.  Even if they are not convicted, they will know the fear of investigation of their action.  

3-There should be retroactive limits on top executive compensation, not only in future contracts as was in the actual bill.  The media did not characterize this correctly as being only for new employment contracts.  While it will seem absurd to the average worker, given the astronomical salaries of those at the top of the financial Industry, moderation will still look like excess.

A simple rule, that no public company can take a risk where failure can result in a credit crisis like what we are experiencing would limit the revenues that in good times make such personal compensation possible

4-The most controversial condition on this site is this one.  This "bailout" should not be used as a device to prevent foreclosures on those who are not able to pay for their outstanding mortgages.  In the bill that was rejected, the term "bailout" was refuted by the provision that in the event that the securities purchased by the Treasury, when resold, fell short of what was paid, the financial companies would owe the difference to the treasure.

Only if the same terms are required for a non-performing mortgages of individuals will it not become a bailout for this group.  A temporary suspension or a lowering of interest rates must be required to ultimately be paid, just as there is a requirement for the financial companies to makeup any "gift" from the taxpayers.  

Such action will complete the cycle of free market economics, something that is inherently risky.   The success of profiting from owning a home must be balanced by the risk of failure, which in this case is the loss of the home, but also includes the forgiveness of the balance of the debt.

That's my list, comment on them and share your own.

Originally posted to veratis on Tue Sep 30, 2008 at 12:41 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips, flames, etc............................... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    and let's hear your own suggestions.  

  •  there is a new bill on the table (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    have you got a look at that yet?

    louise 'hussein' to you! proud donor to "White Dudes for Obama" Endorsed 11/1/07 and never looked back!

    by louisev on Tue Sep 30, 2008 at 12:43:39 PM PDT

    •  No, it must be from the House Republicans... (0+ / 0-)

      I would guess, and their previous ideas really wouldn't do the job, based on those who know.

      •  noooo (0+ / 0-)

        The House Progressive Caucus, led by DeFazio.

        louise 'hussein' to you! proud donor to "White Dudes for Obama" Endorsed 11/1/07 and never looked back!

        by louisev on Tue Sep 30, 2008 at 12:57:22 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  On C-Span right now, a group of progressive Dems (0+ / 0-)

        is presenting a new proposal plan that strives to put main street first, and includes new ideas that address many of the fears of middle-class and low-income taxpayers.  It is NOT a House Republican plan-- though they certainly may present a new edition of their own proposals soon.

        Wow... I am so proud of our Democrats.  They are explaining why they couldn't support either the Bush/Paulson plan or the revised, bi-partisan plan that was voted on yesterday.  So, they worked together last evening after the vote, and this morning, to come up with a new version for consideration, and are offering it up for analysis today.

  •  Mortgage protection? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I am totally lost by what someone intends to do about Mortgage protection.

    And why.

    Freeze foreclosures? What does that accomplish, unless you forgive a couple of months to allow someone to catch up? Bandaid.

    The problem is house values, if the values are set correctly than the person struggling can sell.

    Maybe they can renogiate the mortgage amount to reflect the correct values? It requires a write down, but is that such a bad idea?

    •  Correct values of homes... (0+ / 0-)

      or any other asset is defined as

      That which a willing buyer and seller can agree upon

      this is the market value.

      It was the bubble, and the lax mortgages that cause an artificial boost.  Many people to blame for this, but it includes dems who wanted those who did not have the resources to be home owners.

      Houses are not that far from returning to "fair market values" in most areas.  And if they drop a bit more, buyers will come back, as they already have in some areas.

      The trick is to make mortgages available for them to buy, which is what this "bailout" attempts to do.

  •  Transfer Tax (0+ / 0-)

    As proposed by Peter Defazio, Dennis Kucinich, Thom Hartmann, and others.

    Equity works, as well, and if we had any sense we'd look to how others handled similar crisesin the past.

    "She's not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president?" - Alaska State Senate President Lyda Green (R)

    by brainiacamor on Tue Sep 30, 2008 at 01:23:26 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site