But if that's the way you, the right wing wants to look, I'll just step out of the way and let you have at it.
On the day of the inauguration when Roberts' flubbed the oath I called it right then, right there watching my tv. I said that the right wing would now say Obama wasn't legitimate because he didn't say the oath correctly.
And you all, the right wing, didn't disappoint! How did y'all get to be so fragging predictable?
So just to be doubly sure Barack Obama and Chief Justice Roberts did it again yesterday.
Are you happy now? Over the fold is the answer.
http://www.drudgereport.com/
And Drudge links to an article in the Washinton Post
After a flawless recitation that included no Bible and took 25 seconds, Roberts smiled and said, "Congratulations, again."
further
A president is required by the Constitution to say, "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
At the inauguration, Roberts instead said: "that I will execute the office of president to the United States faithfully."
In a statement, White House counsel Greg Craig said the oath was re-administered "out of an abundance of caution."
So what are you implying Drudge?
That he's NOT legitimate because there was no Bible, which is not Constitutionally mandated any way.
Are you saying Chief Justice Roberts doesn't have a clue?
Or are you suggesting that our Chief Justice IS actually trying to sabotage our new president?
Trying to drum up another faux controversy for an issue that's NOT really an issue.
Shallow much?
But go ahead, as much as I'd like you to stop, as much as the issues and problems of this country transcend this silliness, keep it up. You're base will eat it up and the rest will become even more convinced that there is NOTHING you offer the country.