Skip to main content

As Congress continues to sputter on solutions for the climate crisis, a national coalition of more than 40 environmental, public health, labor, social justice, faith-based and other advocacy groups have announced plans to engage in civil disobedience at the Capitol Power Plant in Washington D.C. on the afternoon of March 2, 2009.

The event, known as the Capitol Climate Action (CCA), will be the largest mass mobilization on global warming in the country's history. The event reflects the growing public demand for bold action to address the climate and energy crises. It means no more waiting, no more excuses, and no more coal.

Over 1,000 people have already RSVP'd, including Dr. James Hansen, environmental leader and 350.org founder Bill McKibben, and author Wendell Berry. In the event's press release, Hansen, whose efforts to inform the public about the dangers of global warming were stifled by the Bush administration, said the time for action is now.

   

"The Capitol Climate Action comes not a moment too soon. For more than thirty years, scientists, environmentalists and people from all walks of life have urged our leaders to take action to stop global warming; and that action has yet to come. Coal is the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the country and that must change. The world is waiting for the Obama administration and Congress to lead the way forward on this defining issue of our time. They need to start by getting coal out of Congress."

The Plant
The Capitol Power Plant, which is owned by Congress and sits just blocks from the American seat of power, burns coal to heat and cool numerous buildings on Capitol Hill. It no longer generates electricity but its reliance on coal - the country's biggest source of global warming pollution and a documented health hazard - has made it the focus of political controversy and a powerful symbol of coal's impact on the environment and public health.

In response to public pressure, the House of Representatives converted half of the plant's fuel to cleaner natural gas. But attempts to remove coal from the fuel mix entirely have been blocked by powerful coal-state Senators Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

How bad is coal?
The diversity of groups involved in the action reflects the number of people affected by global warming. Of all the fossil fuels, coal is the single biggest contributor to global warming. Burning coal cuts short at least 24,000 lives in the U.S. annually, inflicts catastrophic damage to the landscape and water supplies, and jeopardizes the lives of coal miners. Furthermore, the December coal ash spill in Tennessee makes it clear that there is no adequate means of safely storing coal combustion waste.

A recent University of Massachusetts study found investing in clean energy projects like wind power and mass transit creates three to four times more jobs than the same expenditure on the coal industry. The wind power sector has grown to employ more Americans than coal mining as demand for clean energy has jumped over the past decade.

For a list of sponsors and more information about the Capitol Climate Action, visit www.capitolclimateaction.org

How you can help
If you're in the DC area or you want to come to the event, you can RSVP here. If you can't make it, there's a couple of other ways you can join the chorus.

--Embed the Capitol Coal Action widget on your website. Get the code here.
--Change your Facebook profile pic to the March 2nd poster image. Just go to the event page and right click on the image to save it to your desktop. Then go to your Facebook profile photos and choose "edit photo". You can upload the image, viola!

Originally posted to danieljkessler on Tue Feb 03, 2009 at 05:06 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Yes - Invest in Energy Efficiency & Renewables (7+ / 0-)

    You mention that the same expenditure directed to wind creates 3 to 4 times more jobs than coal power does.

    In a related vein (i.e. better ways to spend your money than on coal), according to Utility estimates, Energy Efficiency costs just $.01 per kw hour.  

    On the other hand, according to utility estimates, it costs $.03 per kw hour to provide coal fired electricity.  And that does not factor in any significant environmental costs (GHG, mercury, water depletion, ash "storage", etc.).

    This is incredible.  To understand the power of EEI ("negawatts") consider this scenario:
    A utility provides 9,000MW of coal fired power across it's service area and it believes it needs to build a 1,000MW coal plant to meet growing demand.  The new coal plant would bring total system capacity to 10,000MW.

    For the same investment, redirected to Energy Efficiency, the demand on the utility's system could be reduced by 3,000MW, from 9,000MW to 6,000MW.  

    What makes more sense?  Getting up to 10,000MW of GHG generating coal plants or cutting demand down to 6,000MW?

    Which direction looks right to you?

    Now add this: The hundreds of millions of dollars of annual operating expense for the 3,000MW of shuttered coal plants can be further invested in RE/EEI, continuing the cycle until coal plants provide just 20% of their current generation, GHG, mercury poisoning, etc.

  •  I am emailing my congresswoman now. (5+ / 0-)

    Shut'er down.

    If we can't do this we can't do anything.

    We shall overcome, someday. Yes we can.

    by Sam Wise Gingy on Tue Feb 03, 2009 at 06:06:56 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site