Skip to main content

As the economy teeters on the edge of complete collapse (and judging by the content of the 'stimulus package' is about to slip away), we should ask ourselves what went wrong.

It is actually very simple. We employed the wrong theories.

The effective functioning of our economic system requires a compact between labor and capital. It is a consumer based economy and most of the people in the economy make their living by working, by laboring, not by investments or capital. Therefore, growth in the economy which is generated by increased productivity of the workforce results in increased profits which need to be equitably shared between shareholders and employees. Because those employees are in a broad sense the nation's consumers upon whom the entire economy depends.

With the rise of radical Republicanism in 1980 populist political impulses where channeled into anti-government sentiment resulting in a drive for deregulation and lower taxes. Anti-labor policies were enacted. The fundamental compact between labor and capital was destroyed. Labor was considered to be nothing more than a parasitic business expense. Everything was done to reduce the cost of labor.

But the paradox remained. How can you encourage the consumer economy to continually increase spending, while starving wages, the source of that spending? The answer from the financial 'industry' was credit. Instead of giving workers a share of increased profits generated from increased productivity, they would make cheap easy credit available to them. And how can you extend hundreds of thousands of dollars of credit to people who's incomes simply don't warrant it? Collateral. And the only real collateral the vast majority of people had was their homes. So, you get your corrupt appraisal houses who are in your employ to begin the process of pumping up the artificial value of their shitbox houses. Soon, on paper, the fifty thousand dollar piece of crap house was worth two hundred thousand dollars. Now, this person could refinance and continue to buy all sorts of consumer stuff. Enough to keep the profits flowing. Without any wage increases. Why it was capitalist heaven wasn't it?

If we are serious about fixing this mess, just pumping money into the banks is not enough. Just pumping money into the economy and creating jobs is not enough. We need to restore the fundamental compact between capital and labor so that in the future, labor has the political power to insist on its fair share of the profits generated from increased productivity. This needs to be the engine of growth in this country. Not credit. Unless we do this, any attempts to fix this mess are simply going to create more debt and a bigger mess at the other end of the tunnel.

Originally posted to SW on Sun Feb 08, 2009 at 03:30 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Or (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    we could place people OVER profits.  Grant, people and profits would be quite a good change, but the fundamnetal problem is that people are not OVER profits.

    "What we've seen the last few days is nothing less than the final verdict on an economic philosophy that has completely failed." -- Barack Obama

    by TomP on Sun Feb 08, 2009 at 03:33:01 PM PST

  •  Problem (0+ / 0-)

    The actions you speak of (which actually started under Nixon) concentrated money in the hands of a few. At the same time, the political system was altered to concentrate power in the hands of money.

    So, how do you suggest the change you advocate is going to happen? You really don't think the government is going to do it, do you? The same government that is run by lobbyists and campaign contributions?

    Sorry, I'm having a bad day contemplating my IRAs and wondering what cat food really tastes like.

    •  If the thirties are any guide (0+ / 0-)

      Meaningful change will only happen after the collapse, not before.  That is why any effort to fix this now is doomed to fail.  The public will consider the true fix to be 'too radical' as long as we are in this 'Wiley Coyote' moment.  But once this thing hits, populist anger is going to make a lot of things that seem unthinkable right now, possible.

    •  Actually (0+ / 0-)

      these people were too crazy for Nixon.  Nixon was a ruthless bastard but he wasn't an idiot.  This is the flowering of the Goldwater branch of the Republican Party.  Those who were considered nutcases by mainstream Republicans in the first half of the twentieth century.  While the Republican party has always favored wealth, it took these idiots to destroy the very system that created their wealth.

  •  You are absolutely correct (0+ / 0-)

    Had capital gains tax rates not been so artifically low, there would probably have been less speculation which would have caused us less damage.

    Higher marginal tax rates would help redistribute the wealth, but neither political party has any real interest in pursuing them.

    The Republicans have had really bad theories and they are primarily to blame. I just don't understand why the Democratic Party followed so passively, earning them plenty of distrust.

    I voted with my feet. Good Bye and Good Luck America!!

    by shann on Sun Feb 08, 2009 at 04:22:57 PM PST

  •  Open In Case of Broken Economy (0+ / 0-)


    1. Remove all barriers to collective bargaining
    1. Eliminate "corporate personhood"

    I am not a number...

    by pecosbob on Sun Feb 08, 2009 at 05:00:41 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site