Skip to main content

These past few months have made it abundantly clear that the financial crisis is being felt around the world.  Countries that have seen unprecedented financial gains in the past two decades are now struggling to keep their economies afloat.  Developing nations who were the beneficiaries of an open global economy are now bankrupt.  The world's poorest nations are left with no one offering them a helping hand.

Cross posted at Scoop44 and The New Politics.

All of these problems have seen mainstream media attention, except only recently have international news publications started examining one country that the financial meltdown has hit particularly hard: Scotland.  Back in the fall, many stories detailing UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown's intervention in the United Kingdom's financial collapse appeared in numerous global news sources.  However, few of these stories focused on Scotland.

Scotland has always been proud of its banking.  However, these days, the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is giving the country little to be proud of.  RBS has undoubtedly seen some tough times during these past few months.  Some of the bank's problems were out of the bankers' control, and some of them were directly related to the policies the bank's executives' supported.  The Financial Times is quick to point out that Chief Executive Sir Fred Goodwin had to move quickly from leading RBS down the path of becoming a world financial powerhouse to adapting his methods to a global economic downturn, something that is clearly no easy feat.

However, many of these articles fail to note that there is a unique element to Scotland's banks: they must adjust to different governments' finance policies.  Operating in a devolved country in the United Kingdom, Scotland's banks not only have to shift their policies to meet UK Government financial goals, they must adapt to suit the needs of the Scottish Government as well.  This task is difficult in and of itself, and becomes even more challenging when there are two competing political parties involved.  The Labour Party runs the UK Government, and the Scottish Nationalist Party runs the Scottish Government; the two parties are political adversaries, and disagree on many things, including tax policy and the question of Scottish independence.  The consequences of both political debates have significant effects on Scottish banking, and it can be challenging for the private sector to make the best economic decisions in light of uncertainty in the political arena.

Back in September, when the UK Government provided funds to facilitate the Lloyds TSB and HBOS merger, Gordon Brown was quick to point out that the deal would not have been able to happen had Scotland been independent (a statement that directly challenged Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond's claims that Scotland would be able to ecomically thrive independently).  Today, it was much of the same - Scottish Labour leader Iain Gray went toe to toe against the First Minister at First Minister's Questions on Thursday over the issue of RBS executive pension payouts.  It is clear the bankers have made poor decisions across the globe, and Scotland is no exception - however, one must not forget the role that political parties play in framing these debates.

Originally posted to pamelalachman on Fri Feb 27, 2009 at 01:35 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site