The USDA runs several conservation programs. Most are pretty good and would be better if they were fully funded. But one of them sucks. It might have been good once but in 2002, the rules were changed. Factory farms are now eligible to receive this "conservation" money. The program is called EQIP - the Environmental Quality Initiatives Program.
A report (Industrial Livestock at the Taxpayer Trough) found that nationally, factory hog farms comprise 10.7% of all hog operations - but get 37% of all of the EQIP contracts. Factory farm dairies make up 3.9% of all dairy farms - but they get 54% of EQIP contracts. All in all, between 2003 and 2007, 1000 factory hog and dairy farms ate up $35 million in EQIP conservation funding.
This happened at the expense of smaller farms that COULD HAVE gotten the money. Mid-sized hog farms make up 15% of hog operations but got 5.4% of EQIP contracts. Mid-sized dairy farms make up 13% of dairies - and got 7% of contracts.
THIS SUCKS. And we've got til March 16 to take action.
I'm ripping off the action steps from the Organic Farming Research Foundation. Their focus is on making EQIP more organic-friendly. I would also add that the money should be targeted towards non-CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations, a.k.a. factory farms).
Background Info
Background
In the 2008 Farm Bill, Congress directed the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to change the Environmental Quality Incentives Program in several ways that benefit organic growers and those transitioning to organic. NRCS was directed to create a program within EQIP that provides financial and technical assistance to growers converting to organic. Additionally, NRCS was directed to make organic agriculture a new National Priority for EQIP and to recognize the conservation benefits of organic systems.
NRCS released their Interim Final Rule, or IFR, on January 16th, 2009. Because it is an Interim Final Rule, it went into effect immediately, but the public has 60 days, until March 16th, 2009, to submit comments to NRCS on the IFR. After March 16th, the IFR becomes a Final Rule.
It is crucial that farmers submit comments to NRCS on the EQIP IFR. NRCS fell far short in incorporating organic into EQIP when they wrote the IFR. Specifically, NRCS failed to do the following:
- The IFR does not recognize the Congressional mandate, in section 2501 (4) of the 2008 Farm Bill, to make organic agriculture a new National Priority for EQIP. The IFR should acknowledge this mandate, and the Chief of NRCS should issue a Directive to all State Conservationists reinforcing this change.
- The IFR appears to limit all organic operators to the $80,000 cap that applies to the Organic Conversion Support provision, even though the cap is only applicable for Organic Conversion Support contracts. The Final Rule should clarify that the regular cap of $300,000 applies to organic operators who are not seeking conversion support. Furthermore, the Final Rule should ensure that applications from organic operations could be recognized as providing "extraordinary conservation benefits" and thus eligible for waiver of the $300K limit.
3.The IFR does not require that the new EQIP provision providing assistance for organic conversion be available to growers in all fifty states. The Final Rule should mandate that it be offered in every state.
- There is no language in the IFR that requires the ranking and processing of Organic Conversion Support applications as a separate subcategory. Applications for conversion support should be ranked only against one another.
What to Say
- Acknowledge organic agriculture as a new National Priority for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), as mandated by Congress in the 2008 Farm Bill. The Chief of NRCS should issue a Directive to all State Conservationists reinforcing this change.
- Clarify that the $80,000 cap for Organic Conversion Support contracts applies only to organic conversion plans, and does not cover all organic operations applying to EQIP. Also, clarify that the regular cap of $300,000 applies to organic operators who are not seeking conversion support.
- Ensure that Organic Conversion Support is available in all 50 states.
- Ensure that Organic Conversion Support applications are ranked and processed as a separate subcategory.
Action Instructions
Include "Docket Number NRCS– IFR–08005" at the top of your correspondence or in the subject line of your email.
Mail to:
Financial Assistance Programs Division
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.
Room 5237S
Washington, DC 20250-2890.
Fax to: (202) 720-4265
Online instructions:
- Go to http://www.regulations.gov
- Type "Environmental Quality Incentives Program" into the search bar and click "go". Several results will be displayed on the next screen. The result with Document ID number "CCC_FRDOC_0001-0065" is the Interim Final Rule for EQIP.
- Click on "Send a Comment or Submission" and follow the instructions on the next screen. If you want to read the text of the Interim Final Rule, click on either the PDF or HTML icon next to "View this Document."
Let us know if you submit comments! Email Tracy Lerman, Policy Organizer: tracy at ofrf dot org.
-----------
Other News in My World
Maryland, Maine, New York, and California are considering great new legislation - bans on BPA in baby bottles, menu labeling laws, trans fat bans, and an artificial food dyes ban. Yay!
Hawaii, on the other hand, is thinking about a really stupid menu labeling law. It's so weak that the restaurants are FOR it and the health organizations are AGAINST it.
Lynn Woolsey re-introduced a bill to get junk food out of schools. In the past, Tom Harkin has introduced the same bill in the Senate - no news yet on whether he will do it again. So far Woolsey has a number of cosponsors, but not enough yet to pass the bill. Definitely a good reason to write your congresscritters.
High fructose corn syrup still has mercury in it - despite all of the whining, howling, tantrums, and PR that the HFCS lobby is using to cover up the facts.
Prices are down but food prices are up. If it makes no freaking sense to you, well, you're not alone. The grocery stores are pissed off about it too because it's hurting their business. Energy prices are down, commodity prices are down - farmers are all hurting BAD - so then why the hell is food MORE expensive?