Skip to main content

I recently received a message from a friend from law school in response to a series of posts I've been exchanging with some Facebook friends on the topic of how our political beliefs have changed and how we view the modern GOP.  

I wrote a long reply (which I've copied in and cleaned up below), which expands on some of the themes I touched on in an earlier post The Intellectual Bankruptcy of Today's GOP.  

I decided not to post in his original message but I think you'll be able to follow my thinking without reference to it.

... More below the fold ...

[Originally posted on my blog, Library Grape.]

Dear X,

Thanks for taking the time to write such a thoughtful message on the subject.  I've been pondering it for a bit now and wanted to take the time to sit down and write out a worthy reply.

First of all, I'm glad to see that the last eight years have also led you to a crisis of faith. I consider it to be the true mark of a wise man to be able to question and abandon views and movements that prove to be on the wrong course. so, for this, i salute you.

As a general matter, when reading your message and thinking about it later on, I kept coming back to the idea of faith. This is pretty strange coming from me, considering that I'm a rabid antitheist, although I really shouldn't say that because, of course, "faith" exists outside the confines of religion, but it's still pretty remarkable that the key concept I keep coming back to is faith.

I'd first like to address this point: "If you believe President Obama is deploying the correct strategy to combat the economic crisis, doesn't it follow that you have evolved away from fiscally conservative economic principals that I imagine drew you to the Republican party at some point?"

To be honest with you, i really don't know whether Obama is deploying the correct strategy to combat the economic crisis. At one time, a tenet of my "faith" was that, generally speaking, less regulation, lower taxes, free enterprise, constrained spending (etc., etc.) were the proper prescriptions in order to support the health of our economy. I considered myself right-of-center on economic issues and well left-of-center on social issues (ergo the tag I generally used to describe myself was 'libertarian'). I generally didn't place emphasis too much on social issues because i subscribed to the notion that the right changes would come over time as the calcified elderly in our society died off.

I describe the above as a "tenet of my faith" because ultimately that was what it was: faith. It was not informed by a personal expertise in economics, it was informed by reading various sources who claimed to know what they were talking about and synthesizing it into my own fundamental set of tenets.

And here we come to the "crisis of faith". The last eight years under republican rule, with the almost wholesale implementation of every tenet of the conservative faith, was a catastrophic and unmitigated disaster. It is difficult to find one metric that paints the state of the country in a better position when Bush left office compared to when he came into office.

Bush and his Republican enablers in Congress presided over the largest expansion in government spending since the great depression. And, more importantly, Bush (again, with his republican enablers) became the first President in American history to cut taxes during a time of war. Never before in our country's history has our government decided to drain the country of tax revenue at the one fundamental time when the government unequivocally needs such revenue! There is no greater responsibility, and no greater demand on the federal treasury, than the need to support the active military operations we decide to enter into (whether such wars are justified or not). Yes, I realize that Bush and his criminally incompetent cronies thought that the wars would be a "cake walk", that we would be "greeted as liberators", and would probably be over in just a few short months, which would thereby negate the reckless decision to drain the treasury of revenue because, after all, it wouldn't cost very much because it would all be over soon!

So do I have faith that Obama has all the right answers? I do not. I don't have a lot of faith in any economic theories at the moment right now. What i do know, however, is that many of the economic theories of the conservative movement have proven themselves to be unmitigated disasters. No, I do not have faith in the laffer curve (i.e., cutting taxes produces more revenue). No, i do not have faith that slashing regulation of the financial industry will lead to lasting prosperity and growth.

As for the things I do believe at the moment, which form the basis of my newly crafted "faith", here is a sampling.

I believe that the Phil Gramm-led repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act was one of the largest factors in creating monstrous financial institutions that became too big to fail, which ultimately required trillions of dollars of our hard-earned tax money to be given to them as bailouts.

I believe that Bush was the worst criminal to inhabit the oval office in at least the last century (Monica Lewinsky and Watergate pale in comparison to the politicization of the Justice Department and the indiscriminate torture of detainees in U.S. custody).

I believe that Bush and the Republican leadership of the last eight years are guilty of at least gross mismanagement of our country and our economy.

I believe that most of the problems that Obama is being forced to deal with right now were created by the criminality and mismanagement of the country during the Bush years.

I believe that certain conservative economic precepts (such as restrained spending, balanced budgets, less statism, etc.) still have some merit, yet are generally not appropriate during a severe recession in which consumer spending has cratered and banks are not lending to small businesses.

I believe that it is largely unfair to blame Obama for the spending that he is being forced to undertake in order to bring the federal government back from the edge of the cliff it was pushed onto by Bush and the Republican leadership in Congress. It is as if an arsonist mayor spent eight years burning down a city block and then the city council were to complain that the new mayor is asking the council for money to rebuild.

On to a few closing points with regard the the following excerpts from your email: "The President will need to raise taxes on the highest earners and probably the middle class, too, to pay off his recent stimulus and budget." and "I just feel like we've gotten ourselves into a hole that will require years of heavy taxation and a declining dollar to dig out of."

I agree with you that we will likely need to raise taxes. I encourage you, however, to include the last eight years in your analysis of why this was warranted. In my view, Bush and the Republican leadership in Congress wrecked the country to such an extent they left Obama with a gaping, smoking crater on the day he took office. From just a simple arithmetic perspective, let me again highlight that Bush cut taxes (thereby leaving a gaping hole in government revenue) for the first time in American history during a time of war. By cutting taxes at a time when they should have either stayed stable or risen, Bush made the explicit decision to pass on the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to the next President and our children and grandchildren.

Although I believe there is merit in cutting taxes when times are good in order to disincentivize government waste, I also believe (and this isn't just dewy-eyed naivete) that it is our patriotic duty to pay taxes into a progressive tax system, especially when we are in a time of grave peril with two foreign wars and an economy teetering on the brink. One of the precepts of conservative dogma that I never signed on to (which, as an aside, every notable leader of the Republican party currently does sign on to) is that tax increases are never warranted under any circumstances. Because Bush blasted a crater in government revenue with his reckless and poorly targeted tax cuts and his spending like a drunken sailor on things like a horribly designed medicare prescription drug benefit that just poured money into the pockets of the drug companies, I believe that the only responsible thing to do right now is to reverse some of the bush tax cuts and will probably sign off on another tax increase down the road if it is warranted.

Finally, to your comment "it would not surprise me if the effective tax rate on you and I - after federal, state, city, and usage taxes - pushed 50%" -- c'mon now, the combined tax burden in NYC is already close to 50%! :)

Great to hear from you again, and great to see that you had the presence of mind, and the wisdom, to see at least some of the horrors of the last eight years for what they were.

Originally posted to monitor on Fri Apr 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  You didn't even mention (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ssgbryan, Pandoras Box, monitor

    torture, xenophobia, homophobia, anti-environmentalism, creationism, and Sarah Palin, and you still have overwhelming case of Republican mental malfunction.

    We shall overcome, someday. Yes we can.

    by Sam Wise Gingy on Fri Apr 10, 2009 at 11:28:37 AM PDT

  •  bravo (6+ / 0-)

    well written summary, and I agree with all of your points, I particularly appreciated this one:

    It is as if an arsonist mayor spent eight years burning down a city block and then the city council were to complain that the new mayor is asking the council for money to rebuild.

    too bad the teabaggers don't get it.

    louise 'hussein' to you! proud donor to "White Dudes for Obama" Endorsed 11/1/07 and never looked back!

    by louisev on Fri Apr 10, 2009 at 11:29:02 AM PDT

    •  thanks (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Gowrie Gal

      don't you love that the Teabagger slogan has morphed into "Taxed Enough Already"?  who, the 95% of the people making under $250k who get a tax cut under Obama?  it's really sad to see normal people hijacked into the service of the plutocrats who manipulate them to fight for keeping the plutocrats' taxes low.  oh, that was what happened over the last 8 years?  never mind...

      "There's something horrible and undefeatable about people who have no life except the worship of power. People who don't want the meeting to end."

      by monitor on Fri Apr 10, 2009 at 11:39:14 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Borrow and spend does not equal fiscal discipline (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bronte17, oldjohnbrown, monitor

    The ginormous increases in our federal debt (now at over $11 trillion) under Reagan and Bush have resulted in horrible increases in the size of government.

    If we would have paid the bills 30 years ago, we wouldn't be where we are today.

    Instead, we escalated the size of our military to the point that now spend as much in the US as the rest of the world combined each year.

    The American military is bloated beyond anywhere that a conservative could tolerate.  And yet, what are we seeing this week?

    More Republicans complaining about government spending but refusing to cut the F-22 program.

    The idea of Republicans having fiscal restraint is the biggest fairy tale I've ever heard.

    Justice, mercy, tolerance, hope, love, grace, and redemption are all Judeo-Christian values.

    by Benintn on Fri Apr 10, 2009 at 11:32:38 AM PDT

  •  ayn rand? (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    oldjohnbrown, monitor, Dr Teeth

      oh vey, i can see some of merit in hayek but ayn?

  •  very thoughtful post (5+ / 0-)

    The point about cutting taxes while waging two wars bears repeating over and over, in my opinion.

    And we should never forget that a significant portion of what we are spending on these wars has gone into the pockets of a very well-connected few, much of it through war profiteering and fraud.

    As to financial crisis, those same few made billions and billions in profits that came directly from our pockets.

    Now, in order to survive, because the survival of our entire market mechanism is at stake here, we are forced to replace that money that was sucked out of the system by these few.

    To use the CEO of government analogy so opt repeated by Republicans, it is long past time that they were fired for gross mismanagement.

    "Torture is the tool of the lazy, the stupid, and the pseudo-tough...the greatest recruiting tool that the terrorists have." Maj Gen Paul Eaton

    by whitewidow on Fri Apr 10, 2009 at 11:35:46 AM PDT

  •  On balance... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    oldjohnbrown, monitor, Dr Teeth

    there's no way I'd ever turn Republican.

    That said, I do not have blind faith in the Democrats (particularly the congressional leadership) or embrace every position taken by my party.

    This country would be well-served by a Republican party that was engaged in productive opposition. "Just say no" is not productive opposition, it's an implicit admission that they have no real ideas, no hope but the abject failure of the majority Democrats to reemerge as a viable party and no desire to work within the system to improve, based on their Republican principles, inevitable legislation.

    To elaborate on my last point, I cite the recently passed stimulus bill. I think we can all agree that the AIG bonus debacle it permitted was a mistake.

    Yet it slipped by the opposition party just as it did the majority authors. Why? Because they've adopted a posture of complete abdication instead of working within the system to effect the changes they can.

    Had they been vigilant about engaging in the process, they could have spotted this, raised a fuss, and produced a winning amendment that would have given them credibility going forward.

    Similarly, while a strong supporter of the bill, I can tell you as a business owner that I've already spotted regulatory glitches and omissions that will undoubtedly lessen its potential and impact. These are issues that, again, could have earned an engaged opposition some points for its constructive participation.

    I could go on, but hopefully I've already made my point. As a Democrat, I feel like (then named) Cassius Clay standing overtop a sprawled Sonny Liston screaming "get up, get up." There's just no real fight in them. And the match is made infinitely better by a worthy opponent.  

  •  I actually feel bad for some conservatives (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    oldjohnbrown, jaywillie, monitor

    There is a segment of intellectual conservatives, who I really do feel sympathy for.  While I disagree with 95% of their opinions, I do recognize that they have thought through what they believe.  As the Republicans have moved towards gut level opposition, these people have found their voices completely muted.

    I have no problem listening to someone, who offers an alternate philosophy on governing.  For instance there are people who do agree health care must be addressed, but believe there are more efficient solutions than the Democrats offer.  This is a far greater level of debate than "the government wants to chose your doctor" arguments out of the right.

    Even with the abortion issue, I can respect that someone has a deep moral objection against the practice.  However, any legitimate moral debate gets lost in inflammatory rhetoric from the social conservative movement.

    If the GOP continues elevating people like Sarah Palin, and rejecting serious political minds, I see the Republicans shattering into factions.  While this may seem like a victory for us, I am not so convinced.  I believe there is always a good and bad with any policy decision.  The absence of fair debate often accumulates unintended consequences.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site