Skip to main content

We've been having great fun at the GOP's expense, making fun of their kneejerk responses to every democratic proposal. We've relegated them first to the wilderness, then to the fossil record.

The "Party of No" is its own worst enemy, automatically adopting positions that are wildy unpopular (torture), illogical (the world is cooling) or just batshit crazy (The Flinstones are historically factual).

The GOP hasn't failed so much because of a shrinking tent, or even because of fighting within the tent. They're losing because they support policy positions that are ethically and/or factually untenable.

There fate should be a lesson to us, because even though we're having great fun lobbing stones, we're building a glass house of our own by always saying yes, when we should be saying "hell no!"

Some are arguing that's it's still too early to pass judgment. We're still in the honeymoon phase. We need to stand behind our man. If he says yes, we say yes too.

After all we can't risk losing the new members of our big tent; lobbyists for the pharmaceutical/healthcare industrial complex, the "clean" (albeit mountainless) coal industry, the opaque government movement, those that think the Nuremberg principle and Geneva convention only apply to terrorists and suiciders, etc.


A president that really wants health care reform is going to be one that stands up to the pharmaceutical/healthcare industry, not someone who is all too willing to kiss their rear ends and join a bogus PR effort about cutting health care costs by a couple trillion.

"These groups are voluntarily coming together to make an unprecedented commitment," Mr. Obama said. "Over the next 10 years, from 2010 to 2019, they are pledging to cut the rate of growth of national health care spending by 1.5 percentage points each year — an amount that’s equal to over $2 trillion."

Of course that 2 trillion in "savings" isn't really savings, it's the industry promising to slow the rate of growth of what they charge us. So that MRI you can't afford now, will only be slightly more unaffordable, thanks to the "voluntary" effort being put forth and embraced by Obama (You know, kind of like that voluntary regulation of the banking industry).  

But apparently, even that is too much to ask of America's health care executives

Hospitals and insurance companies said Thursday that President Obama had substantially overstated their promise earlier this week to reduce the growth of health spending.

My question is, why isn't the president meeting with doctors and nurses who care about real health care reform? Try talking to health care providers who aren't putting financial gain ahead of patient health, Mr. President. That would be change I could believe in.


Obama has acknowledged that things like waterboarding constitute torture (and therefore a violation of national and international law), but nevertheless, is refusing to prosecute anyone involved. Not the sick bastards that performed the actual torture (where do they find these people anyway), nor the masterminds who rationalized it as expedient to "keep us safe." Not even when it's becoming apparent that torture was used, not to prevent a ticking bomb, but to fabricate evidence that one existed.

It's bad enough the president is letting the perpetrators and the architects of torture go free without so much as a limp wristed slap, he's also moved to squelch any further discussion of it.

That's not change I can believe in. It's more of the same. If you want change Mr. President, you need a backbone first. Here's a primer from former governor Jesse Ventura:

"It's a good thing I'm not president," Ventura said. "I would prosecute every person involved in that torture. I would prosecute the people that did it. I would prosecute the people that ordered it. Because torture is against the law."

If you want to show us change, hire Ventura as an independent prosecutor. That would be a change.


Obama's EPA has just removed the holds on 42 of 48 mountaintop removal permits].

Or as the Huffington Post puts it, more waterboarding Appalachia's mountains:

Read that line again: Have 42 out of 48 permits for mountaintop removal -- the process of blowing up our nation's oldest and most diverse mountains, razing historic communities, poisoning watersheds, and causing massive erosion and flooding, which Vice President Al Gore has termed "a crime, and ought to be treated as a crime" -- cleared as "environmentally responsible" by the Obama administration's EPA?

Since President Barack Obama has taken office, an estimated 300 million pounds of ammonium nitrate/fuel oil explosives have been detonated across our American mountains.

In effect: Residents in the mountaintop removal areas have been subjected to a kind of waterboarding environmental policies.

Will the administration suppress photos from Appalachia too? All we have to do is say yes and pretend it's not happening.


So much for standing up to the medieval military policy of judging people, not by ability, but by who they want to spend time with in their private lives. The president is apparently flaking out on his promise to do away with don't ask don't tell policy. A policy that insures that the most qualified person, if he or she is gay, won't be in the position to serve and protect our country.

Mr. President, if we retained the competent individuals in our military who happen to be gay, maybe we could stop recruiting felons and immigrants to fill the ranks. That would be a change.


The point of this rant is not to paint Obama as the emperor’s new apprentice. But it is to rail against becoming "Party of Yes" instead of holding the feet of our elected officials to the fire (up to and especially including the president) when they deserve it. If we don't, it won't be long before it's the donkey that's relegated to the fossil record.

We blasted Bush for concealing evidence on torture, for making it harder for citizens to know what our government is doing, for giving the green light to destructive environmental practices. Why shouldn't we hold Obama to the same standard? Should we simply say yes because of the letter that comes after the name, regardless of the action? I for one say "hell no!"

Originally posted to nemoplanetia on Fri May 15, 2009 at 09:39 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Have you actually (7+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Trix, ogre, Arken, begone, DaNang65, TFinSF, Texdude

    read the diaries and comments here?  Have you done a statistical analysis of those who are in some imaginary "party of yes"?  

  •  I'd tip Nemo (0+ / 0-)

    and troll rate the others if I could.  

    Nemo nailed it.  One of the most dead on posts ever.
    Drink up Neo-Freepers.

    "Take whatever you can, Steal whatever you can't take, Kill what you can't steal so no one else can have it." - Republican Business Philosophy

    by Pen on Sat May 16, 2009 at 02:18:10 AM PDT

  •  Your list is too short. (0+ / 0-)

    He is saving GM and Chrysler and throwing Michigan and workers under the bus.   They are closing four US plants and moving the work to China.  This had made the WS Obama administration very proud of their foster child.   They will become profitable on the backs of US workers just like the rest of the companies.

    Obama is a disaster.  He is worse than Bill Clinton.

    They're asking for another four years -- in a just world, they'd get 10 to 20 ~~ Dennis Kucinich

    by dkmich on Sat May 16, 2009 at 03:41:18 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site