Skip to main content

We've all noticed how extreme the Republican Party has become. When a moderate voice speaks up to be heard, it is quickly extinguished. Case in point: Kevin Stevenson, now former Republican Party spokesman for Marathon County, Wisconsin.

Mr. Stevenson writes a regular guest column for the Wausau Daily Herald. On March 24, 2009, Mr. Stevenson wrote a column criticizing Rush Limbaugh. As a result, he lost his job as Republican Party spokesman for Marathon County, Wisconsin.

Sadly, today's politics is full of self-interest. Rush Limabugh is not a politician. He does believe in conservatism and has a forum to express his views. You must admit that he has a large and loyal following, but so does Rachel Maddow as an extreme liberal.

Both of these people need to shock to keep their ratings high. They are entertainers who earn their living by what they say, not what they accomplish.

Republicans do not agree with all of the president's policies, but no one wants him to fail as president. That's because when leaders fail, so do their followers. No good citizen wants the United States to fail. Some may think that he will fail, but this is far different from wanting him to fail.

Kevin Stevenson
Wausau Daily Herald
March 24, 2009

The column is not available any longer on the paper's website (I transcribed the quote from Keith Olbermann's WTF Moment on Tuesday night (see video below). What is available is the article about Mr. Stevenson being ousted as the GOP spokesman for his remarks.

When Stevenson criticized Limbaugh for saying he wanted President Barack Obama to fail, other local Republicans wrote to the newspaper, arguing that conservatives ought to want Obama's policies to fail.

"This is just part of what you're seeing nationwide," he said. "(Party members) know that I don't agree with Rush Limbaugh. Rush Limbaugh is hurting us more than helping us."

Kevin Hermening, the local Republican Party treasurer and a past president, said although Stevenson's columns were circulated among the party's executive committee, they did not always represent the views of most members.

"He was sharing a moderate view in his columns, which I think is terrific," Hermening said. "If the leadership had wanted a more moderate position, we would have let him (continue)."

Rush Limbaugh critic Kevin Stevenson ousted as Marathon County Republican Party spokesman

That last quote just floored me! And here is the statement by Kevin Stevenson, the person who is "too moderate" for the Republican Party in Marathon County:

Editor: The most imminent danger facing the Republican Party comes from within. A growing party embraces its differences and uses the strengths of its differences in a positive manner. Differences should not be feared, but embraced as we as Americans are a mixture of diverse cultures with a rich history.

The Republican Party is at a crossroads. Purging people who have differences from its ranks will insure that it remains a minority party well into the future. The direction the Republican Party chooses will determine its fate, not the Democrat Party.

-- Kevin Stevenson, Former Spokesperson Republican Party of Marathon County

Letter: Former spokesperson fears party may self-destruct

What was Rush Limbaugh's response to all this?

I know the story going -- this is about this little schlub up in Wisconsin. Yes, I know all about it, I know all about it. Look, that's not even big enough for me to worry about. That guy's such a podunk, it's not even worthy of our time on the E -- I wish you wouldn't interrupt me with this stuff. If you're gonna interrupt me every time I'm on that stupid government-run channel, then I'm going to be doing nothing but reacting to the government-run channel. All they do is run videotape of me and people complaining about me. I'm talking about government-run MSNBC. Some little podunk Republican -- moderate liberal Republican who was thrown out of his leadership post in Wausau, Wisconsin, some county there, because he dared criticize me. And so this guy is now loved and adored by government-run media. Big whoop. This has been going on for three days. This is not even new news.

Limbaugh responds: Ex-Marathon County GOP spokesman a 'schlub,' a 'podunk Republican'

Is this how to win friends and influence people? Call them names like "podunk" and immediately alienate other moderates in the Republican Party?

Mike Moran, chairman of the Marathon County Democratic Party, had something to say as well,

... That's why I again want to reiterate that I give my local Republican Party colleague, along with Sens. Specter and Snowe, credit for standing up in their own different ways against the Limbaugh approach.

I hope more Republicans will follow their lead. Otherwise, we Democrats are happy to continue welcoming more moderates to our Party.

Column: Standing up to Limbaugh

Meanwhile, Kevin Stevenson may have lost his job as spokesman for his local GOP, but he still writes columns for the Wausau Daily Herald. Here is his column from last Tuesday: Cap and trade goes the wrong way. He also appeared on MSNBC on Friday. The Huffington Post has posted video from MSNBC, which can't be embedded here because it uses iframes:

"[T]hey didn't like what I said about Rush, and they had tied that into some other things and it basically came up that, well, you're a moderate. Yes, I am a Republican who has moderate views on social issues. And they said, we can't allow that. You can't write for us if you're not with us."

Kevin Stevenson On Losing GOP Post After Criticizing Limbaugh (VIDEO)

This brings us to Keith Olbermann's WTF Moment on Tuesday night, wherein Mr. Olbermann reminded us that this is not the first time a political party in this country destroyed itself from within. The other party in our two-party system was once the Whig Party. For those without the ability to watch the video on your computer, I have transcribed Mr. Olbermann's comment starting about half way through, and posted it below the video.

Purging. An ugly word, but the correct one. If you don't agree with the extremism of Limbaugh, you're out. Ask Arlen Spector, Michael Steele, Congressman Gingrey, John McCain, Roberta McCain, Meghan McCain. And if you point out it is extremism, one of the guys escorting you out the door will shout, "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice." The odds are pretty good that the screamer will know that it is Barry Goldwater he is quoting. The odds are also pretty good that the screamer will never had made that great intellectual leap to the realization that 110 days after Barry Goldwater uttered that immortal manifesto, he lost the election, by 16 million votes and 434 of them in the Electoral College.

The problem is, then and now, if you keep showing people the door, sooner or later there will be more people outside the door than inside it with you. And this brings us back to the hypothetical 167 year old viewer who said, "I warned Daniel Webster about this back in 1852, and he didn't listen to me either."

The Whig Party was half of the American two party system. It rose to prominence by being the Party of No in fierce opposition to the then dominant Democrats. The Whigs managed to elect William Henry Harrison president, and then Zachary Taylor. The party included them and Daniel Webster and the famous Senator Henry Clay and former and future presidents like John Quincy Adams, John Tyler and Millard Fillmore. As the 1850s began, the Whigs had an incredible advantage, as well. The Democrats were descending into a pro-slavery position. Whereupon, the pro-slavery faction in the Whig Party started to expel the anti-slavery Whigs. Then they put the squeeze on the Whigs who were merely neutral or moderate about slavery. There was a purge, a cleansing, of those who were not conservative enough to be Whigs. So the local Whig party leader in Illinois quit the party. In fact, he quit politics. He went back to being a lawyer. His name was Abraham Lincoln.

But, the Whigs kept their party pure. Extremism in the defense of what they believed was liberty was no vice and by 1860 the Whigs had no candidates. They didn't even hold a convention.

Kevin Stevenson is not Abraham Lincoln and ultraconservative rage of today is not the issue of slavery, and the Republicans are not the Whigs. Not yet, anyway. But no organization, political or otherwise, collapses only from the top. Just as you have to screw it up nationally, so too do you have to unravel it down to the grassroots. As the firing of Mr. Stevenson by the Marathon County GOP suggests, the one area in which Republicans are firing on all cylinders, is firing moderate Republicans.

Countdown with Keith Olbermann, WTF Moment, June 2, 2009

I watched that segment Tuesday night and thought it was awesome. I wanted to write a diary about it then, but I was just so tired on Tuesday, I wasn't up to it. I started thinking about it, and went back and watched it again today, after I read an interesting article in the New York Times.

Yes, the Republican Party is destroying itself from within. They are destroying themselves at the top nationally, and at the grassroots level. I'm not sure exactly what the test is these days to be a "Pure Republican" but it is safe to assume that there are a lot of people who don't pass the test. The Democratic Administration, could just sit back and watch this self-destruction go on until its inevitable conclusion. But, that's not what's happening.

In picking Republicans like Mr. McHugh for top jobs, the Obama administration says it is assembling a coalition government that welcomes qualified members of the opposition. It gives the White House a claim to bipartisanship despite continuing clashes with Republican Congressional leaders.

But the political benefits are an equally strong incentive. Remaining Republican colleagues become discouraged and feel further isolated in the minority. Political vacancies are created. And Republicans can be painted as being hostile to more moderate Republicans or those willing to engage the Democratic administration.

In embracing select Republicans, the Obama administration — notably Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff — seems to be applying this maxim: Hug them until it hurts.

"This Machiavellian strategy is pure Rahm," said John Feehery, a Republican strategist and former top House aide. "It is brilliant and it is painful for Republicans."

Hugging Republicans Until It Hurts

Creating vacancies in a Republican seat produces consequences: a new election. At which point, the Republicans battling within their own party, struggle to find a candidate to run for that seat. Who are they going to choose? Another moderate like the person who just vacated the seat to join the Obama Administration? In the current atmosphere of the Republican Party? There are going to be some interesting special elections to watch.

Originally posted to hungrycoyote on Sat Jun 06, 2009 at 06:00 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Have you hugged a Republican today? (24+ / 0-)

    Be sure let your Republican friends know, that if they have been purged from the Republican Party, "Democrats are happy to continue welcoming more moderates to our Party."

    Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. -- Eleanor Roosevelt

    by hungrycoyote on Sat Jun 06, 2009 at 06:00:09 PM PDT

  •  I thought it was a spelling error (6+ / 0-)

    My best guess was you meant "Mugging Republicans".

    Still, being polite and welcoming to Repentant or Recovering Republicans might not be a bad idea after all.

    "If another country builds a better car, we buy it. If they make a better wine, we drink it. If they have better healthcare . . . what's our problem? "

    by mbayrob on Sat Jun 06, 2009 at 07:15:17 PM PDT

  •  The Republicans are acting like the Democrats (0+ / 0-)

    during the Nixon/Reagan era. Much like the Democrats of the 1970s and the 1980s, who drove out moderates, the GOP is following the same destructive patterns. They need their own version of the DLC.

    •  Worse, I think. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JVolvo, happymisanthropy

      Remember that race had a lot to do with things.  Folks who run the numbers point out that most of the shift was the flipping of conservative, race-aware (if not racist) Democrats switching to the GOP.  And turning the GOP from the Party Of Lincoln into the Party Of Jefferson Davis.

      Take that away, and the shift wasn't real big.

      Democrats were never as enthusiastic about pushing people overboard as these clowns are.

      "If another country builds a better car, we buy it. If they make a better wine, we drink it. If they have better healthcare . . . what's our problem? "

      by mbayrob on Sat Jun 06, 2009 at 08:19:12 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Not all of it was race (0+ / 0-)

        Democrats lost suburbanites in that time period. Not all of them left due to race. Race was a part of it; it explains the Dixiecrats, but not suburbanites.

        •  But most of it was (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          You're expressing what used to be the conventional wisdom until people really did the numbers carefully.  Turns out the conventional wisdom wasn't so wise.  Or right.

          And even with the suburbanites, there's a large racial component, as people who were motivated by race to leave the inner city moved to the periphery. There certainly were Reagan Democrats, but it turns out to have been a less significant phenomena that previously thought.

          As working class whites became more Republican, white collar whites became substantially more Democratic.  It's close to a wash.

          A good source for this:   The Emerging Democratic Majority By John B. Judis, Ruy Teixeira

          "If another country builds a better car, we buy it. If they make a better wine, we drink it. If they have better healthcare . . . what's our problem? "

          by mbayrob on Sat Jun 06, 2009 at 09:43:35 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  No, the Trillions of Thefts, the Hundreds of (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    thousands of deaths, the global depression and the global near-depression, the anti-rationalism, the hatred.

    It's just a real bummer.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Sat Jun 06, 2009 at 08:15:21 PM PDT

  •  Too Moderate... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Calamity Jean

    I think it's amazing that someone who calls the other side "the Democrat Party" is deemed insufficiently loyal to the GOP big tent.

    NeoCons' view on torture: if it's good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for anyone!

    by clone12 on Sun Jun 07, 2009 at 08:53:29 PM PDT

  •  LET them die (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Byron from Denver, Sue Stone, Zubeck

    When Kirk was informed by Spock that the destruction of the Praxis moon  had doomed the Klingons, Kirk's reply was that of an old warrior who knew the nature of his enemy:

    "LET them die."

    Philosophical principles derived from fictional dialogues are risky, yet sometimes true. LET the modern Republican Party, infested as it is with conservativism, DIE.

    Conservativism has been a yoke dragging down the advance of the American civilization since the beginning of the Republic. It has stood athwart every single social advance of the past 240 years.

    Conservatives OPPOSED the end of the slave trade; they OPPOSED independence; they OPPOSED the Constitution; they OPPOSED the Bill of Rights; they OPPOSED abolition of slavery; they OPPOSED fighting the Confederacy; they OPPOSED woman's suffrage; they OPPOSED labor reform; they OPPOSED trust-busting; they OPPOSED entry into WWI; they OPPOSED the League of Nations; they OPPOSED entry into WWII; they OPPOSED the United Nations; they OPPOSED Civil Rights; they have OPPOSED reproductive freedom; they have OPPOSED every social advance that we as a nation have attempted to make.

    They are useless, they are evil. Not Republicans - but Conservatives. We need an opposition party in America, but not a party that OPPOSES the advance of civilization itself. Any society that harbors and embraces a force which wishes not to shape the advance of society - but instead to DESTROY society - is a society bent on suicide.

    So LET them die.

    •  At first, the reference to (0+ / 0-)

      Star Trek had me setting it aside, but then you got me back with "athwart". Who the hell says athwart?

      I rec'd you for it, and of course the substance of the post.

      And I'll close with a quote from the same movie. It might be off a bit, but if paraphrased is close enough.

      "Is it possible that we two, you and I, have become so old and inflexible in our ideas that we are no longer useful?"

      •  who says "athwart"? (0+ / 0-)

        Old geezers do. People like me who are still liberal but shake our bony fists at the metaphorical kids traipsing through our backyards.

        Live long and prosper.

        •  Even most (0+ / 0-)

          of the geezers I know have left that one behind. It was refreshing.
          For the record, I'm about 4 years older than topsoil. The original stuff, not what passes for it nowadays.

          Peace and long life.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site