Skip to main content

This should be obvious: we need to get GOP politicians on the record as saying that the murder of Dr. George Tiller was an act -- a successful act -- of terrorism.  We need the public to understand that this is terrorism.

I called the office of my local Congressman, Gary Miller (CA-42), this afternoon.  The Washington office was already closed, so I asked them to get some information for which I'd call back tomorrow: "Does Rep. Miller consider the killing of Dr. Tiller to be an act of terrorism?"

I urge you to call your representatives (especially GOP represetnatives) and ask them the same question, plus some additional questions I ask below.

Otherwise, all we're going to see about this is the likes of this comment on the clinic closing from a represenative of Operation Rescue:

Troy Newman, the leader of Operation Rescue, had said that closing the clinic now would send a worrisome message. "Good God, do not close this abortion clinic for this reason," he said in an interview with The New York Times. "Every kook in the world will get some notion."

Surprised?  I have to admit that I was.  An Operation Rescue leader is, in effect, calling for continued availability of abortion services because the alternative is for our society to be seen as giving in to terrorism.

Now -- after word that the clinic is closing permanently, meaning that this act of terrorism has achieved its objective -- are Republican politicians smart enough to do likewise?

My bet is that they are not, but I'm open to being convinced otherwise.

Now, as I see it, Republican politicians can have a variety of responses to the Tiller murder and clinic closing.  Starting from most obnoxious to least obnoxious:

  1. They can support what Scott Roeder did.  (This probably won't happen.  They leave that to their constituents, who are even now writing him letters of support in prison.)  If they say this, they support terrorism.
  1. They can simply refuse to answer.  (Some may try this, but once we know who they are we can make their lives miserable until they give up the tactic.)  If they do this, they have refused to condemn terrorism.
  1. They can mildly condemn what Roeder did, but say that it's "understandable" given the "provocation".  (We will see this response, I'm sure.)  If they say this, they support our being understanding of the motivations for terrorism.
  1. They can mildly condem what Roeder did, without justifying it, but reject proposals to ensure the preservation, re-institution, or expansion of abortion services so as to counter terrorist attempts to curtail them.  (We will, I suspect, see a lot of this.)  If they say this, they accept letting the terrorists win.
  1. They can put aside their personal beliefs and agree that if terrorists are trying to curtail legal abortion services, it is the responsibility of the federal and state governments to preserve, re-institute, or expand them.  (I don't expect to see much of this, but maybe I'll be surprised.)  If they say this -- and I frankly hope that every one of them does -- they are committing to fighting terrorism, and I expect their votes to follow their words.

So, the questions you want to ask Republican Members of Congress -- and hell, let's ask other Republican officials and Democrats and nonpartisan politicians as well -- are these:

  1. Do you condemn the shooting of Dr. Tiller as terrorism?
  1. Do you in any way try to justify or minimize it?
  1. Do you believe that, now that it has obtained its objective of closing one prominent clinic, the government should act to ensure that all legal abortion services become no less available than would be so in the absence of this terrorism?

You may have to make more than one call for each member.  I expect to have to do so.  But I want to know the answers -- and to publish them.  Remember, you are not calling about defending abortion rights.  You are calling about fighting terrorism.  It's OK to be pissed!

If you're with me on this, or you have suggestions for improvements, leave that feedback in comments.  If you want to say who you plan to call -- and you don't have to be in their district, though of course it helps -- then please do so.

Originally posted to Doane Spills on Tue Jun 09, 2009 at 04:19 PM PDT.

Poll

Is calling your Reps tomorrow worth your time and effort?

0%0 votes
13%7 votes
3%2 votes
1%1 votes
1%1 votes
11%6 votes
13%7 votes
7%4 votes
13%7 votes
7%4 votes
9%5 votes
15%8 votes

| 52 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site