Skip to main content

Last night the House Ethics Committee announced that it was conducting a preliminary inquiry into the now defunct PMA lobbying firm and its relationships with House lawmakers. The firm, which was founded by former Democratic staffers on the House Armed Services Committee was shuttered after the FBI raided its offices last year. Basically its employees stand accused of making PAC contributions to members of the Armed Services Committee in exchange for earmarked appropriations which benefited PMA's clients in the defense industry

In an editorial, the San Francisco Examiner says the scheme PMA stands accused of, "appears to be a Chicago-style "pay to play" network that trades earmarks for campaign dough that could potentially involve at least 100 congressmen." These Congressmen earmarked $300 million in defense earmarks for PMA's clients.

Among this group of Congressmen is Virginia Democrat Jim Moran. According to the Associated Press, Moran has received $997,348 since 1989. Some Republicans have called on Congressman Moran to give the money back. As for earmarks, Moran has been prolific. (Critics also pointed out that many defense contractors with business before Rep. Moran's subcommittee made a significant amount of campaign contributions to the gubernatorial campaign of his brother, former Del. Brian Moran.)

I think that's the right thing to do.  While Congressman Moran hasn't been accused of wrongdoing, I believe he should give this money back until the investigation is completed. He certainly should say more about what he knows and what his ties are to PMA. (After all, his colleague, Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-Ind.) has temporarily given up his subcommittee chairmanship after Federal investigators subpoenaed him.)

As the New York Times writes:

It is a sordid and far-too-common tale: PMA’s top lobbyists began as House appropriations staffers and then capitalized on their connections and savvy to strike it rich in the private sector. Still the full story needs to be laid out before the public of how this money roundelay worked — from contractor to lawmaker, with the American taxpayer always footing the bill.

Of all the members of our Virginia Congressional delegation, I probably have the most in common with Jim Moran when it comes to policy issues. If I were a member of Congress, I would vote with Moran almost all the time. In that sense, he has been a perfect representative for me. (And I am a constituent.)

But in recent years, Congressman Moran's personal behavior has troubled me. I didn't like the punching of a fellow Congressman on the House floor, I didn't like the bullying of a kid in Old Town and I hated the way he handled his divorce, his personal finances and I certainly don't like the sniff of anti-Semitism which came out in the 2004 campaign. Now he stands accused of participating in a pay for play political scheme.

As much as I admire his policy stances, I wish my Congressman would clean up his act. If there was a credible Democrat to run against him in the 2010 primary on ethics and integrity, I would give them a serious look. And if the GOP would nominate a moderate Republican in the mold of Tom Davis, I would vote for them against Rep. Moran.

Congressman Moran, please don't give the GOP an opening. I don't want to return to the days of Stan Parris. Maybe you should retire before this happens.

I think there is no shortage of Democrats who could represent me in Congress without the ethical baggage that comes with you in office.

Cross posted to Fake Virginia.

Originally posted to Fake Virginia on Fri Jun 12, 2009 at 07:54 AM PDT.

Poll

Do you think the PMA lobbying scandal could hand the GOP an ethics issue heading into the 2010 elections?

9%7 votes
14%11 votes
76%57 votes

| 75 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    •  I bet Moran is primaried (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      theran, kestrel9000

      I mean there have been moves to do so in the past -- Kate Hanley, former Fairfax Chairman who lives in Reston considered running against Moran a few years back but her husband was diagnosed with cancer and she felt she needed to spend time with him and did not run.

      I live in Gerry Connelly's district but Moran's district is only a mile away -- the 2010 redistricting could very will shift the boundaries just as the 1990 redistricting took out of Frank Wolf's district and into the newly formed 11th.

  •  How about we let tZoe Lofgren (0+ / 0-)

    complete the House ethics investigation before we throw stones.

    What FDR giveth; GWB taketh away.

    by Marie on Fri Jun 12, 2009 at 11:23:33 AM PDT

    •  PMA aside (0+ / 0-)

      I don't like my Congressman. I think his personal life is a mess and those mistakes are well documented. Even if the PMA wasn't involving my Congressman, I would like someone to run against him in a primary.

      What Rep. Moran has done consistently is raise a ton of money which scares off any primary opponent. Given the expense of buying TV time on the DC stations, any challenger would have to raise several million dollars to be competitive.

      Do you find his personal behavior acceptable?

      •  As he's not my Rep, I (0+ / 0-)

        have no knowledge of and therefore, no opinion on Moran's personal behavior.  However, as I tend to base my vote on the job performance of elected officials and not their personal behavior (assuming it's not illegal, unethical, or sleazy), his personal behavior might not bother me.

        What FDR giveth; GWB taketh away.

        by Marie on Sat Jun 13, 2009 at 03:24:42 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Here's some background (0+ / 0-)

          Maybe this will help you understand just how long my Congressman has frustrated me. He votes the right way from my point of view, but his behavior is problematic.

          Maybe I would be more willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on this PMA matter if he didn't have such a questionable history, but that's not the case.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site