Skip to main content

The beast has dwelled within museum halls and captured the minds and imaginations of the people for over a hundred years--Tyrannosaurus (Tyrant Lizard).


It lived in the late Cretaceous, one of the last theropods to occupy the northern hemisphere (part of a group called the Tyrannosauridae that took over the massive meat eater niche in the mid Cretaceous, though Tyrannosaurus itself did not appear readily until much later--roughly 68 million years ago until non-avian dinsoaurs were obliterated 65 million years ago).


Absolutely, I'd be running.

But predator?

Well... there are those who disagree. This guy for example--


Jack Horner of the Museum of the Rockies, one of the primary influences for Michael Crichton's character Alan Grant--possibly most famous for his work on dinosaur nesting behavior and the probability of the herbivores moving in herds (I'm convinced some if not many theropods lived in groups as well, but that's another story).

There are several lines of evidence he points towards.

First was its arms.


First of all, it had two fingers (as opposed to the dinosaur and, not surprisingly--bird tri-finger characteristic), not quite so useful for grasping fleeing prey.

But even more important was its scale--relative to the creature itself, they were barely evident. Their functionality was quite obviously less important than it was for many other large theropods (who do indeed also have small arms, but nowhere near the extreme that Tyrannosaurus takes it).

Secondly he points out the shape of its teeth--most predatory dinosaur teeth are blade-shaped and laterally compressed with serrations (thin and sharp!). Sorta like this guy--


Tyrannosaurus on the other hand held teeth that were designed for crushing bone, not slicing through meat. He argued that teeth like this would be ideal for a scavenger trying to get as much from its meal as it could (bone marrow can be quite nutritious), but not so useful for a predator slicing chunks of meat from its prey. Its jaw was also designed for this bone-crushing functionality with one of the strongest bite forces known.

He also points out its highly developed olfactory cavity--it had an amazingly well-developed sense of smell, superb for a scavenger searching for a carcass.

But most are not convinced.

Beyond ecosystem reconstruction (assuming we have a good sample of large theropods of the era and that there wasn't an entire different genus that we are not aware of), one of the most telling lines of evidence was given by Ken Carpenter.


A portion of  a series of this hadrosaur's caudal (tail) vertebrae were bitten off by a Tyrannosaurus in life--they were then given the time to heal, implying that it not dead when the Tyrannosaur chomped down.

This shows that at least sometimes Tyrannosaurus would attack live prey.

My thoughts are somewhat of a midline--like most modern predators, I have no doubt it would have scavenged any chance it could get; a corpse is much easier to deal with than a creature interested in its own self-preservation. However, I also think that if the opportunity arose it would gladly attack the Late Cretaceous wildlife for a meal--the teeth do suggest a differential methodology of feeding (my own thought lies something like the African lion but without arms to hold the prey--take the bone crushing teeth and clamp down on the bone to sever the spinal chord or throat). It wouldn't slice repeatedly with its teeth--they weren't designed for that.

Granted, this's mostly just speculation on my part, but it seems to match the evidence at hand.


Originally posted to Username4242 on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 10:15 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site