Skip to main content

Even though the US does not have health care for everyone, we still spend more than twice as much per a person than Canada.

In 1999, health administration costs totaled at least $294.3 billion in the United States, or $1,059 per capita, as compared with $307 per capita in Canada.

(New England Journal)

Now Canada has been criticized for not providing enough, for being underfunded. So what if the US took the Canada system and doubled the funding? We would still be at two thirds the cost of what we have now, which does not cover everyone.

And here is the first reason why – we have health insurance companies that take 31 cents of every health care dollar right off the top!

After exclusions, administration accounted for 31.0 percent of health care expenditures in the United States

(New England Journal)

The second reason why the US has such incredible high per person health care costs compared to Canada is how we do health care:

Americans like to believe that, with most things, more is better. But research suggests that where medicine is concerned it may actually be worse. For example,  Rochester, Minnesota, where the Mayo Clinic dominates the scene, has fantastically high levels of technological capability and quality, but its Medicare spending is in the lowest fifteen per cent of the country—$6,688 per enrollee in 2006, which is eight thousand dollars less than the figure for McAllen. Two economists working at Dartmouth, Katherine Baicker and Amitabh Chandra, found that the more money Medicare spent per person in a given state the lower that state’s quality ranking tended to be.
(New Yorker)

Note that Mayo model is not only the most efficient, but is widely regarded as the best health care. People come from all over the world for the Mayo healthcare. In the Mayo model, we have the most efficient cost ($6,688) and in the McAllen model, the least efficient ($6,688 + $8,000). By using the Mayo model and by assuming a normal distribution of costs between the best and worst models, we could half the savings ($4,000) over an average cost ($6,688 + $4,000) =  37%. So if we assume that health care cost ranges normally between the between the best and worst, by the numbers in this articles, then 37% of the money being spent on health care could be improved. Since only 69 cents of the health care insurance dollar goes to health care, 37% of 69 cent is 26 cents. So take away 26 cents, which leaves 43 cents on health insurance dollar really being spent on good core health care.  

And basically this diagram analysis confirms the  comparison with Canada costs, which is 29% of what the US spends. This confirms the recommendation that the US would like a more fully funded Canadian model.

Crossposted at MN Progressive Project.

Originally posted to MN Progressive Project on Tue Jun 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Required Acceptance Needed. (0+ / 0-)

    Are Canadian Health care providers required to accept their  national insurance? In the US health care providers are not required to accept private insurance.  St.Lukes Hospital in Newburgh,NY refused to accept their own employees health insurance provided by their Union. The management  required the employees purchase the hospitals insurance for a higher price. My Aunt lost her house when a hospital 15 miles away refused to accept the St.Lukes Hospital Insurance for cancer treatment. Health care providers have to be required to accept the insurance or it will not work out.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site