I didn't make up this story By Dana Gloger (UK Daily Express):
Married Lorna Bradley, 31, volunteered to have the child so her brother, Steven Ponder, 28, a special constable, could start a family with his partner, PC Ivan Sigston, 43. The men are said to be "over the moon" about the baby, a boy, but the move has been criticised by campaigners.
The pair are thought to be the first gay couple to father a child born in Britain. They were both present when mother-of-three Mrs. Bradley gave birth to William Campbell Ponder-Sigston last month at her home.
Sigston, a police dog handler and former soldier, provided the sperm, according to the report.
The newspaper said: "Mrs. Bradley reportedly handed over the baby 48 hours after giving birth and the three registered his birth together on June 13. But neither of the men, who live in a £300,000 bungalow in Southampton, put himself down as the father on the birth certificate. Only Mrs Bradley’s name appears."
According to the charity Surrogacy UK, the arrangement was not a binding surrogacy and William’s only legal guardian is Mrs. Bradley, the newspaper reported. The couple will have to adopt the baby to gain parental rights.
Mrs. Bradley, of Worthing, West Sussex, had the consent of her husband. Darren, 34, who is said to have offered to be a surrogate after her brother and his partner told her of their wishes to have a child.
Some questions on this fantasy incest:
•Her husband gave permission. She was pregnant, possibly grumpy, for nine months in order to have a baby that would be raised by two guys. Did the husband once complain during this trial, or is he kind of docile?
•What was the partner imagining for inspiration when he "provided" the sperm?
•Is the sister the mother of the child, the aunt, or just another unexciting female vessel?
•What is the relation of the mother/aunt's husband to the child - stepfather, uncle-in-law, father?
•Since she was the only name on the birth certificate, isn't any child born while they were married the husband's responsibility if they become divorced, and would he have to pay child support?
•Last question: why do people do these things?
Meanwhile, in the United States we are also concerned about gay partners, who are entitled in some states to company healthcare from their "partners."
In the spirit of being brutally unfair, the rules that apply to two same sex lovers do not apply to blood relatives, when it comes to healthcare. You cannot include your mother, father, brother, sister, or your children over 25 as part of your family policy - even if they live with you.
That is, unless you pretend a gay partnership with them, so that the relationship on the health application says "gay partner", not Dad or Mom. Disgusting? Yes, but indicative of the consequences of laws catering to minorities and ignoring the rest of us.
Real universal healthcare will solve that, and I'm sure my grandchildren may see that day within the next 20 years, or after the revolution, when pitchforks replace blue dog bitch dorks.