Skip to main content

I just got in from Rep. Pete Stark's standing-room-only healthcare reform town-hall meeting in Alameda. I didn't speak, but had a rink-side seat, five yards from the congressman's podium. Speakers at the meeting were chosen mostly randomly. In the final third of the meeting, though, Stark wisely made it a point to "hear from the other side," the minority present which clearly opposed the healthcare-reform legislation currently under consideration in Washington. I'm pleased to report that it was a fruitful, mostly orderly hour and twenty minutes, which a few loons from the LaRouche Society failed to disrupt. Labor and single-payer advocates were well-represented, so were many people who openly supported Obama's plan, or who were largely sympathetic, but had questions.

I had wanted to be more involved in the progressive effort in the days leading up to the meeting, phone-banking for progressive turnout, and the like. There may well have been a MoveOn email with details about how to do this, but I misplaced it. The few phone calls I made, didn't amount to anything.

There were a lot of people out in front of the City Hall with signs for Obama's healthcare-plan, and for single payer. I'd say we out-numbered the LaRouch-ers and tea-baggers 9:1.

I wasn't taking notes, but sample questions for Stark from the audience included, "How are we going to pay for this?" and "Why doesn't the plan under consideration include coverage for illegal immigrants, since they use our emergency rooms, anyway?"

Stark had thoughtful answers. In most cases that I recall, he clearly nailed each question, and did it in such a way that the audience was satisfied.

There were, as I've said, a few nuts--probably less than 3% of the attendees inside the room. By a "nut," I don't mean someone who disagrees in good faith with provisions of the healthcare-reform legislation under consideration; I mean someone intent on disruption and division. My favorite was the woman in the back of the room,  with a Lyndon LaRouche sign, who burst in about "how her multiple sclerosis might oneday make her a candidate for euthanasia, if the new legislation was passed."

I can't resist putting in here that I have MS, too; it disqualifies me from eligibility for for-profit healthcare funding by making it too costly to afford. Come to think of it, that's a basic reason I'm so interested in healthcare reform.

This LaRouche nutjob (who may have been one of the unfortunates with cerebral lesions that cause dementia :) was shouted-down by other attendees, not for her message, but because she rudely ignored Stark's protocol of ordering speakers by randomly calling out numbers handed to him.

Another archconservative, maybe a LaRoucher, got shouted-down later, with a chant of "Wait your TURN!" "Wait your TURN!" "Wait your TURN!

"The sense of entitlement on some of these people is amazing," I thought of the LaRouchers. "They're in a minority that's clearly lost, they are hopelessly fragmented, without message control, AND STILL THEY WANT TO MONOPOLIZE THE DISCUSSION."

They didn't succeed. It was a good afternoon.  

Originally posted to karmsy on Sat Aug 15, 2009 at 03:35 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site