Skip to main content

Donors to NOM, the anti-marriage equality, Gathering Storm loving, WaPo puff piece receiving organization are so afraid of their names being made public that NOM is now running into trouble in two different states in the same week for failing adhere to campaign finance laws.

Today the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Elections Practices sent the Stand for Marriage Maine PAC (the Yes on 1 campaign) and the National Organization for Marriage an "opportunity to respond to request for investigation". (sorry no link yet, I just have a .pdf)

Ballot question 1 in Maine is Prop 8 all over again.  Maine passed marriage equality legislatively and NOM put up $250k to hire a Michigan to gather signatures to force a referendum on the legislation. Voters in Maine this fall will be asked if they want to take away marriage equality.  It's up to all of us to stop it. (flip it)

Californian's Against Hate's Fred Karger requested that the commission investigate several allegations against NOM and the Stand for Marriage PAC, by law the commission has to consider the request and "make the investigation if the reason stated for the request show sufficient grounds for believing that a violation may have occurred."  The questions revolve around NOM needing to file as a ballot question committee, or a PAC.  They are just passing cash right now to the Stand for Marriage Maine PAC.

The letter reports how the National Organization for Marriage, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland, the national office of the Knights of Columbus and Focus on the Family had contributors give the money to their organizations, and in turn gave the money to the Stand for Marriage Maine to hide the donors’ identity.

It turns out that the Roman Catholic Dioceses of Portland would rather funnel money through NOM to stop people from getting married, than keep open churches that they are shuttering.

Fight back against all of this laundering of money by giving proudly to the No on 1 campaign on ActBlue.

Meanwhile in Iowa, NOM is flooding nearly $100k into one state legislative special election campaign.  They are hoping they will be able to get a referendum on the ballot there as well.  Earlier this week the independent Iowa Ethics board sent a strong warning to NOM that they being watched for likely violations of the law.  From One Iowa's blog:

Last Friday NOM filed an independent expenditure report for nearly $90,000 worth of ads. The letter makes clear that to continue to file in this manner would run afoul of Iowa election laws.

One Iowa has been calling for NOM to release the names of their contributors since Monday. Please sign our petition now to keep their feet to the fire!

NOM had previously marketed the following claim to perspective donors: "NOM has the ability to protect donor identities, ensuring that you, your family, and your business are not targeted by gay marriage advocates for harassment."

The anti-gay marriage group has spent thousands to flood rural Iowa with ads for an anti-gay legislative candidate and has raised funds specifically for their "Reclaim Iowa" campaign. The special election is set for next Tuesday and reports show that NOM has spent more than either of the candidates have spent on the race!

Speak loudly with your dollars, ones that will be proudly disclosed!  Don't let another Prop 8 happen.  Stop NOM.  Keep the momentum for marriage equality in this country going.  Give to the No on 1 campaign via Actblue.

Originally posted to juls on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 03:22 PM PDT.


I gave to No on 1 because

44%4 votes
11%1 votes
22%2 votes
11%1 votes
11%1 votes

| 9 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site