Skip to main content

So, I was just listening to the Diane Rehm show on NPR and became so completely enraged both at Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan and at the mealy-mouthed host and guests, that I had to turn it off.  Diane herself was not hosting the show, it was Frank Sesno.  It was their usual type of follow-up program to the president's speech last night.

A lady called Deborah called in.  She said that she is a small business owner and buys health insurance for her family (there are three of them, I think she said) on the individual market.  She pays $1,000 per month in premiums, and Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan just let her know that her premium will soon go up by about 30%.  Nothing so strange about that, right?  Everybody is used to insurance companies putting up their premiums by colossal amounts every year.  (For example, see nickm11's diary today.)  The difference is that a representative of Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan told Deborah that this year healthcare reform was to blame for the increase!

Specifically, she was told that the huge increase in her premium was the result of Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan having to start covering people's pre-existing conditions.  Anyone with half a brain can see that this is complete and utter nonsense: the healthcare reform bill hasn't passed yet, and if and when it does, nobody knows what final form it may take.  It may well have a clause inserted to extend the date by which insurance companies will have to start covering people's pre-existing conditions.

So, apparently some scumbags at Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan have cynically trained their customer service reps to tell this lie to customers to deflect blame for higher premiums from the company to the healthcare reform bill.  I can only assume that this measure is aimed at killing support for the bill among their customers, who constitute 65% of Michigan's private health insurance holders (I think that's what "65% of market" means--source: http://www.americanprogress.org/... ).  

And if one insurance company is doing it, I'm sure others are too.  I can't think of a more contemptible example of a corporation propagandizing in favor of its own interests.  It's even scummier than forcing employees to listen to anti-unionization lectures.

What really pissed me off was that neither the host nor any of the guests pointed out the obvious mendacity of what the caller had been told.  They just made vague statements about how everyone who now has health insurance will have to pay more in order to cover the currently uninsured, totally reinforcing the impression that the Blue Cross/Blue Shield propaganda had given, and spreading it to a national audience.  Thanks, guys!

According to the Diane Rehm Show's page the guests were:

Norman Ornstein, is resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute; coauthor with Thomas Mann of "The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track."

Joseph Antos, is Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and Retirement Policy at the American Enterprise Institute.

Judy Feder, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress and professor of public policy at Georgetown University.

Carrie Budoff Brown, Health Care reporter for Politico.

Of course, I would expect nothing more than that from American Enterprise Institute employees.  That place is like a Works Progress Administration for lightweight conservative intellectuals.

In contrast with the nonsense that "Deborah from Michigan" was told, the reason for premium increases given by Blue Cross/Blue Shield to Michigan regulators was "to help cover $133 million in financial losses in 2008 on its individual health insurance policies," as reported by the Crain's Detroit Business in August.

Additional details at this website, which I am not familiar with, but which seems legit in its use of sources, give me the impression that BC/BS is a heartless, money-grubbing, vampiric borg:

Blue Cross originally sought to raise individual rates by 56 percent and group rates by 41 percent. Its proposed rate increases were initially rejected by the state’s Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation, which negotiated the still-significant hikes.

The new rates, set to take effect October 1, will affect 163,000 policies.

Blue Cross is also awaiting a September 14 hearing on its proposed 33 percent rate hike for senior citizens
....
Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox took exception to the proposed increases, saying Blue Cross should cover its losses with its current $2.4 billion surplus.

You can read an exchange of letters between Reps. Dingell and Levin and BCBS on these rate hikes at these links:

http://www.house.gov/...

http://www.redorbit.com/...

Cry me a river, Blue Cross/Blue Shield.  Show me your budget if you want any sympathy for your plight.

Originally posted to Ruthtopia on Thu Sep 10, 2009 at 11:35 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site