Skip to main content

Mike Capuano is the progressive candidate in the special election to replace Ted Kennedy in the senate and he deserves our support.  There are a lot of good things to say about Capuano but it is also important to discuss  some of the unsavory elements of Martha Coakley's career.

Coakley is a careerist and supported her two former bosses in the Middlesex DA's office as they ran for governor--Scott Harshbarger and Tom Reilly, who was clearly the least progressive candidate in the last Dem primary for governor.  

Far more damning is her continued support of Harshbarger and Reilly's involvement in one of the worst cases of child sexual abuse hysteria of the '80s--the Fells Acres case.  A mother and two adult children (Violet and Cheryl and Gerald Amirault) were convicted and sent to prison for very lengthy sentences (Gerald served 18 years)  on the basis of vigorously coached and outlandish testimony from children.  Harshbarger and Reilly sacrificed children (by implanting "memories") and the Amirault family for their political ambitions, even long after the nation recognized the hysteria involved in most of the allegations of sexual abuse in daycare centers.

Dorothy Rabinowitz wrote a definitive and scathing criticism of the case for the WSJ "A Darkness in Massachusetts" (1/31/95) and in her book, No Crueler Tyrannies: Accusation, False Witness and Other Terrors of Our Times (WSJ Books, 2004), but Coakley continues to insist it was a good conviction, because her career has been built on following the blocks set by Harshbarger and Reilly, and by following that pernicious advice popularized in Massachusetts by Tip O'Neil: go along to get along.  

Coakley continued to encourage parents of Fells Acres children to prosecute the case on local media when public sentiment and elected officials started to call for parole for the Amiraults and a re-examination of the case, and consequently to question whether Harshbarger and Reilly had dishonored the office of Middlesex County District Attorney.  For her "loyalty" she received the support of their machine when Reilly. like Harshbarger, went from Middlesex D.A. to state AG, a two-step that Coakley completed in 2006.

Anyone who works within the criminal justice system, anyone, that is with anything approaching progressive politics or simply a concern for justice, knows that prosecutorial misconduct is one of the most damaging and intractable features of the system.  The district attorney, an elected official at the county level, has the most power of anyone in the system, and practically unlimited discretion to prosecute, or choose not to prosecute, cases brought by law enforcement.  

The district attorney sets an agenda for which areas of law enforcement to emphasize because it is impossible for the criminal justice system, especially the courts and corrections, to address every case of law-breaking.  District attorneys can be tremendously effective change agents, as when they began to take seriously cases of domestic violence, or when they establish alternatives to traditional adjudication with drug courts or procedures for restorative justice.   Because of their autonomy and the political nature of the office, they get a lot of attention, and command a bully pulpit at the local level.  It is not surprising that so many go on to Congress; for example, Arlen Specter, Patrick Leahy and Amy Klobuchar among others in the Senate and many more in the House, including Bill Delahunt in the Massachusetts delegation.

But with this power comes responsibility.  Too many district attorneys, and prosecutors on their staffs, view their job as a matter of getting convictions, as part of the adversarial process.  That is not the job of the D.A. or any prosecutor, who after all, represents the people.  Their mission is to seek the truth and justice.  When a prosecutor finds exculpatory evidence, she is required to share it with the defense counsel (and the defendant!).  Far too often, this does not happen, and there are many people in prison and on death row who have been victimized by the political aspirations of district attorneys who have wanted to demonstrate that they are "tough on crime" and will protect the people from the bad men who pose the major threat to their security.

As part of their "tough on crime" persona, some district attorneys have staff show up at all parole hearings to oppose parole for inmates who are eligible for parole.  Parole eligibility is part of their sentence but many district attorneys and attorneys general confuse the task of honorably pursuing a conviction in a criminal trial with being eternally disposed against a defendant.  They also align themselves, understandably, with victims of crime and support these victims when they testify at parole hearings.  Too often, however, as in death penalty cases, the prosecutor uses the victims to make an appeal for the death penalty or against parole, knowing that this will actually prevent closure for the family of the victims for many years as the process drags on, when a life sentence or parole could end the family's involvement.  Cui bono?  the elected DA who can proudly claim unrelenting "war on crime."

I asked Martha Coakley, when she was running for Middlesex D.A., if she would continue the practice of automatically opposing parole and she said she would, not knowing my position on the issue.  I didn't get a chance to ask about her continued support of the Fells Acres prosecution--that would have been deemed impolite at the meeting of my town Democratic committee.    

Yes, Coakley is a woman, and I'd really like to see more women in the Senate and the House, but Coakley is more a part of the good 'ol boys network than Capuano.  She has been cultivating downtown business interests since she got the AG position.  She is so far from the best the state has to offer it would actually be tragic to see her in the senate, when the state has outstanding progressives in the Congressional delegation such as Capuano, Jim McGovern and John Tierney.  I'm a big fan of Barbara Boxer and Debbie Stabenow, and favorably disposed to several other women senators, but if you share my frustration with Dianne Feinstein and Blanche Lincoln, be very afraid of wasting a senate seat, a safe Democratic senate seat from Massachusetts, on Martha Coakley

Originally posted to jhannon on Sun Sep 13, 2009 at 06:07 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (8+ / 0-)

    If looks could kill it would have been us instead of him.

    by jhannon on Sun Sep 13, 2009 at 06:07:47 PM PDT

  •  chuckle (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I don't have a horse in this race, but I haven't seen an oppo dump in a while.

    Accelerated silly season!

    Ok, so I read the polls.

    by andgarden on Sun Sep 13, 2009 at 06:25:24 PM PDT

    •  I am not calling you out but... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      the diarist"s other work doesn't seem to support your assertion. Sounds like he knows Coakley and doesen't like her...he is certainly not alone and his acessment of her as a proscutor seem spot on...

    •  Oppo dump, my ass! (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ChurchofBruce, Massconfusion

      I've been on this site a long time and my progressive credentials are pretty good.  
      What I had to say about Coakley and the Fells Acres case is just stating the facts, and I care because I live here--in Massachusetts.  It's a short race and people need the facts out quickly.

      I don't think the race to replace Ted Kennedy is a chuckling matter.

      If looks could kill it would have been us instead of him.

      by jhannon on Sun Sep 13, 2009 at 07:13:39 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  A careerist who is trying to appeal DOMA (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Yeah...good try there buddy.

  •  Coakley is a novice (4+ / 0-)

    her interview on MSNBC was abominable.  In it she made clear that she wasn't even aware of Federal statutes regarding the use of Federal dollars to fund abortion.  I couldn't believe the amazing naivete of this woman - especially considering her background.

    No doubt in my mind that Coakley is definitely "not ready".

  •  Hear Hear... (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ChurchofBruce, jhannon, alba, caduceus4

    Gender nonwithstanding...MC is a moderate at best whose moral compass has long ago become demagnitized. She seeks not truth but higher office at the expense of all else...her ambition has outdistanced her intellect long ago!

  •  I have met Capuano a few times (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mem from somerville, alba

    and had a chance to chat with him at length on one occasion, at a table that also include Carolyn McCarthy, whom I consider a good friend.

    Mike Capuano is thoughtful, a hard worker, builds working relationships across the political spectrum.

    He also does not have the name recognition, and if Coakley is the only woman against several men, she might be hard to beat, even though Mike would start with a huge money advantage.  

    It is a free shot for him -  it does not require him to give up his House seat, since this would be a special election.  

    I have met McGovern once, IIRC at a fundraiser for Netroots Nation in DC.  I know people who think highly of him as well.

    I do not know Tierney, and am not really familiar with his track record.

    Nor do I know much about Coakley, but what I do know does not inspire me with the confidence that she would take progressive positions.

    I hope all candidates are pushed for commitment to a public option -  if health care is still on the table after the person takes office, it would be criminal if s/he did not support what Kennedy worked so hard to achieve.

    In fact, I think in this case it would be more than fair to try to tie all Democratic candidates to supporting the positions and issues to which Teddy devoted himself, and in any case where they disagree to state forthrightly why.  

    do we still have a Republic and a Constitution if our elected officials will not stand up for them on our behalf?

    by teacherken on Sun Sep 13, 2009 at 06:31:28 PM PDT

    •  I agree, Mike is a hard worker. (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ChurchofBruce, jhannon, Massconfusion

      He treats Congress like it's his job, not a media opportunity.  

      Martha has come out for the public option, and Mike is firm on it as well.  

      Earns no money here for blogging, commenting, or driving traffic to any web site.

      by mem from somerville on Sun Sep 13, 2009 at 06:47:57 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Quick note, Ken (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      mem from somerville, jhannon

      John Tierney's my rep. What mem says below about Mike Capuano also applies to Tierney. He's a hard worker, treats it like his job, and has committed to the PO. (His voting record is, as someone else put it, "the progressive's progressive".) He's also approachable as all get out if you see him walking down the street from the coffee shop to his district office in Peabody Square :).

      DKos: The left's home for sanctimonious defeatism since 2008.
      "The last time we broke a president, we got Reagan"--Bush Bites

      by ChurchofBruce on Sun Sep 13, 2009 at 08:25:41 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks for the inside dope on Coakley (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ChurchofBruce, Massconfusion

    I had a bad feeling about her when I watched her on Hardball. It would compound the tragedy of Ted Kennedy's loss if he were to be replaced by a calculating nonentity like Coakley.

  •  I very much prefer Capuano (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    but I will not shred Martha Coakley.  I would certainly work for her in the general if it came out that way.  

    Earns no money here for blogging, commenting, or driving traffic to any web site.

    by mem from somerville on Sun Sep 13, 2009 at 06:46:45 PM PDT

  •  In 98 martha came to my town committee (2+ / 0-)

    for candidate night.

    I spoke to her afterward about the nanny case.

    She was ferocious in her belief that they had been correct in their prosecution of her.

    What bothered me is that she was so adamant and cocky in telling me that I just didn't have a clue as to what she knew was the "truth."

    It was then that I knew that I could never support her for anything.

    Coincedentally Mike Capuano was there that night and spoke to my husband and me at length afterward, even though he knew we were supporting someone else in the primary.

    He surprised many of us, winning that circus of a primary so strongly.

    What we didn't pay attention to was his old fashioned work ethic and mastery of creating a powerful and effective political machine.

    My money is on Mike Capuano.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site