Many of us knew Al Sharpton only from reports of his New York activities. From his questionable involvement with a questionable accusation, to his questionable political involvement in NYC campaigns, to his quick and frequest use of the "racist" card. The image of that Sharpton on a national stage, representing the Democratic party, was unpleasant.
Reverand Sharpton's comments at the debates and forums have been a pleasant surprise. He framed the Democratic agenda in clear and humorous ways that other candidates can only envy. He encouraged other candidates to attack BushCo, not each other.
There have been warning signs that things were changing. Although Sharpton campaigns very little (compared to "serious" candidates) outside the debates/forums, there has in recent weeks been the sniff of "racist" charges for his lackluster position in polls and his treatment as a no-chance candidate by the media.
Now Sharpton has unleashed his fury on Howard Dean. It's not clear that Dean differs substantively from any other candidate in his commitment to minority rights and opportunities. What is clear is the the precipitating event: Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.'s endorsement of Dean. Reverand Sharpton is offended that any black community leaders might prefer to endorse candidates with a history of accomplishment within government, with detailed ideas, and with a chance of winning the nomination and election.
Which brings us full-circle: is Sharpton nothing more than the self-promoter many originally feared? The Democratic party does not need televised images of Sharpton's rhetoric -- reminders of a party allegedly dominated by special interests -- to be broadcast across the nation.
Is it time for Reverand Sharpton to leave the race? Or leave the stage at debates and forums? What is the proper way for Governor Dean, or other candidates, to respond to Sharpton's charges of racism?