Skip to main content

With a hat tip to Will Ferrell, I propose a new word that is to "regulation" what "strategery" is to "strategy": "regularation."  

Domestic financial regularation involves five federal agencies for which it is a primary purpose: the FDIC, Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision and the National Credit Union Administration.  (This doesn't even count some agencies who are more tangentially involved in the process, such as the IRS and FTC.)  Global financial regularation involves an array of agencies that would need more coherence to earn the description of "hodgepodge."

Why worry about regularation?  Because proposals from foxes on how to reorganize the henhouse are coming out right now, especially in the wake of the G-20, and it's time to think them through and knock some down.

I am alerted to this, once again, by columnist Alain Sherter of BNET, who is not only an experienced observer of the business community but is also, to remain a little vague about it, part of my mispukhah.  I don't port in his columns every time he writes one, but I do when I think that they're of interest to people here.  His latest column is of serious interest.  (Give it a click!)

What got my immediate undivided attention was this, from Sherter:

If all this [mish-mosh of regularators] sounds like a recipe for agita, it is. And keep in mind this is only within the U.S. So when someone like Morgan Stanley’s John Mack comes along and proposes an “uber-regulator” to police all financial institutions everywhere, all one can do is try not to giggle (or suspect ulterior motives).

Indeed.  Morgan Stanely's John Mack has proposed a pretty substantial revision to the world financial regulation system: essentially, a single global czar.  One regularator to rule them all.

Now I don't know what to think of this proposal, although I have some immediate reflexive reactions.  I don't like that it comes from John Fund as opposed to, say, Joe Stiglitz.  But what's important from my perspective is not the specifics of the proposal -- it's that the financials are thinking seriously about regularatory reform, and they are clearly thinking big.

“I think the crisis is over,” Mack said in yesterday’s interview. “What I worry about is that we lose momentum with some of the regulatory changes that we need to go through.”

Uh-oh.

Sherter concludes with some of his own thoughts on the issue (links in the original article):

As finance envelops the earth, the shifting economic, political and legal plates have left regulatory chasms. U.S. officials want to bridge them by simplifying things, perhaps by forming a noble Round Table of regulators and a separate consumer protection agency. That’s a start. Yet they could do more.

Instead of merely combining the sieve-like OCC and OTS into a single banking and thrift supervisor, as has been proposed, it could consolidate all five agencies that oversee depository institutions. When everyone’s accountable, no one is. That might also ease the turf fights that hobble regulation. Another worthy cause would be to end the practice of financial institutions funding the very agencies charged with watching them, an invitation to “regulatory capture.” Most important, our political class should banish the thoroughly bebunked notion that markets can groom themselves.

That's worth thinking about.  Whatever you conclude about the proposal, you should conclude this: change is in the air, and it is time to educate ourselves about regularation before others who claim to know it all impose their proposals on us.

Originally posted to Doane Spills on Fri Oct 02, 2009 at 09:15 AM PDT.

Poll

If you could be any domestic financial regulatory agency

14%4 votes
22%6 votes
3%1 votes
3%1 votes
3%1 votes
51%14 votes

| 27 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site