Skip to main content

If you haven't already seen the video, here it is:

An Open Letter to the, um, Scholars Behind the Video

Dear Fellow Concerned Christian Scholars:

First off let me say that I was delighted to learn from your short video that our current president, Barack Obama, is actually the Antichrist.  I'm guessing when you first discovered Obama's name in Luke 10:18 that you were drop-jawed in amazement, flabbergasted.  I try to imagine how it happened.  There you were, in Abilene, or Lubbock, or Arlington, minding your own business and just practicing your ancient Hebrew by translating Gospel passages into that language, when suddenly, Wow, there's this staggering utterance from Jesus himself:

I have seen Satan fall like Barack Obama.

It's amazing really, and it must have left you in awe.  I don't know what I would do if I suddenly ran into a line like that.  I'd probably light my hair on fire and run from the house screaming.

I know there are some will probably claim your discovery only came to you because you were looking for passages to demonize our current president.  Let these liberals say what they want.  I would never attribute such low motives to you.  I can tell by the honesty and warmth in the faint southern accent of the man narrating your video that you are good Christian people and are thus not likely to spend your time going out of your way to demonize others.  Especially not a man who has dedicated his life to serving his country.

In fact I firmly believe you yourselves must have been deeply disheartened to discover that your country's elected leader, the man who represents you to the world, is actually an incarnation of the Evil One.  Probably at first, after making your discovery, you were tempted to keep quiet about it out of shame. And out of patriotism. But you believe in truth, and truth will out.  So finally you had to come forward.  Yes, I feel I understand you.

Though your scholarly methods in this video are excellent all round, I was a little surprised by your assertion that Aramaic, the language Jesus spoke, is "the most ancient form of Hebrew."  Of course Aramaic is not the most ancient form of Hebrew, but a different language.  Probably as scholars you know this, but your presenter, nervous in front of the microphone, just slipped up temporarily.  Whatever.

Also it's a little strange that you take Jesus' words, presumably spoken in Aramaic, and give them in Hebrew.  I understand that in Aramaic the phrase "lightning from the heights" wouldn't come out sounding like "barack o bama" and that your whole video would be pointless if you used the Aramaic.  But I think I get your deeper meaning here: Jesus, though he spoke Aramaic, normally thought in Hebrew, Hebrew being his Father's language.  Jesus held his Father's language in greater esteem than his mother tongue.  I'm guessing you guys are Protestants, aren't you?

Of course another little problem is that "barack o bama" in Hebrew wouldn't mean, as you say, "lighting from the heights" but rather "lightning and the heights."  It's a minor problem I know, I'm sorry to bring it up, and who needs such nitpicking anyway?  Your heart is in the right place, and that's what counts when doing linguistic analysis of ancient languages, no?

I'm in full support of your implied assertion that New Testament references to "lightning" are really references to Barack Obama.  Actually when I first saw your video, I was really excited by it, I couldn't sit still, I was hopping around the living room gesticulating.  Ask my wife if you don't believe me.  It's not every day I see such a major breakthrough in scholarship presented in four minutes on YouTube.  I was giddy about it, so I took your ideas and went looking around elsewhere in the New Testament.  Though not a scholar of the caliber of you guys exactly, I do know my Bible pretty well.  And I wanted to see what else God might have said about President Obama.  The first passage I came upon was Revelation 4:5, which says the following:

From [God's] throne came flashes of Barack.

Now that's really interesting, I thought, what to make of it?  Of course here I've translated the word lightning into our president's name, just as you do.  So the text of Revelation seems to say that Obama was sent by God, or that "flashes" of Obama (maybe televised speeches, or appearances on Letterman?) come from God Himself.  Almost like how God sends his Son, or the Spirit.

In truth I was kind of uncomfortable with this idea, because, hey, though I respect our president and all, I'm not about to start calling him the Second Coming of Christ.  So I decided to go back to the Gospels to see if there was anything else that God said about Obama.

Let me tell you it's pretty amazing what I found.  It's actually World-Altering maybe.  It's going to change Everything.

In the same Gospel you used, the Gospel of Luke, in chapter 17--really I'm surprised you didn't notice it too--Jesus is talking to his disciples, warning them not to go after false prophets, not to be taken in by those who are not the Real Thing.  Then Jesus, in describing his Second Coming, says he will be like our current president.  He says it right there in the Bible!

For the Son of Man will be like Barack, which flashes and lights up the sky from one end to the other.

Of course Jesus doesn't say here that he will be Barack, only that he will be like Barack.  But what the heck?  If it's permissible, as you do in your video, to say that "lightning and the heights" really means "lightning from the heights," why can't we just get rid of the word like in this later passage of Luke?  Or why can't we change it to a similar word, namely as?  I mean, if when Jesus is talking about lightning he's really talking about Obama, isn't he here saying that he will come back as Obama?

If that isn't enough to convince non-Bible believers, I mean the skeptics who don't read the Bible seriously like we do, then there's this verse, Matthew 24:27:

For as Barack coming from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.

Now Chicago is kind of in the east, don’t you think?  And Barack is truly visible all the way to the west--with TV he's visible anywhere really.  So again we have the same implication here in the Gospel of Matthew.

I don't know about you, but when I think that our current president, Barack Obama, is really Christ come back to earth I get kind of teary eyed with emotion.  I mean I get teary eyed that it's happening now, in my lifetime.  That I myself had the choice of voting for Christ or voting Republican (i.e., against Christ) and I voted the right way.  Because I voted Obama.  Or, as you might say, I voted from the heights.  

Come to think of it, this last election was maybe the great winnowing and sifting Jesus speaks of in the Gospels--that those who voted Obama will be gathered into the granary, but those who voted Republican will be burned up like chaff.  And there will be a great wailing and gnashing of teeth.

As for me, I'm anxious to go back to the Old Testament and begin looking into all the prophecies and revelations about our current president.  I really can't thank you enough for your scholarly acumen in setting me on the right track.  I'm now starting to think that maybe, since Obama is actually the Second Coming, maybe McCain was the Antichrist. You think?  Or maybe it was Cheney.  To be honest I'm guessing Cheney is more likely.  I'll have to look up how to say Dick in Hebrew.  I also kind of suspect, in this fascinating new End Times scenario, that maybe Sarah Palin is the Whore of Babylon.  

Sincerely,

Eric Mader

Originally posted to EricMaderLin on Fri Oct 02, 2009 at 11:33 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site