Skip to main content

Cross-posted from Hannah Blog, where you can see an image of the "documents."

In 1960, any number of public officials didn’t want the people they were supposed to serve counted, especially in the South. So, one of the tricks they employed was to arrest the enumerator who was going door to door, preferably on a Friday afternoon, on a charge of "impersonating a census taker," and let him languish in jail over the weekend until the federal supervisor could be brought in on Monday to authenticate his employee. No doubt, a weekend in jail was discouraging to some. Which was why many neighborhoods had to be canvassed over and over again.

Now, almost fifty years later, the Republican National Committee has progressed. Instead of charging enumerators with "impersonating a census taker," they’re sending out documents to impersonate the census itself. While, upon closer inspection, the overt purpose is to solicit monetary donations to promote the election of Republicans in 2010, the packet that arrived in the mail is so fraught with deceptions that it’s hard to imagine what they’re actually up to, or to know where to begin. So, I’ll just work from the outside in.

About the only thing apparently authentic about the plain white envelope the mailman left was the metered stamp identifying the sender as a "NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION" operating out of zip code 24551 and having paid $00.08 in U.S. POSTAGE!  Why non-profits, in addition to having to pay no tax, get a subsidy from the postal service is a mystery.  That they were charged only eight cents for an envelope that weighs more than an ounce is an outrage.  Maybe it's the "DO NOT DESTROY, OFFICIAL DOCUMENT" notation which tricked the P.O.

The only other feature of the exterior envelope, a glassine window almost half its size, serves to distract from this minor outrage.  Mine reads:

SPECIAL NOTICE:  You have been selected to represent Republican voters in New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District.
Enclosed please find documents registered in your name.

DELIVER EXCLUSIVELY TO : my name

Census Document Registered To:

name
address
zip + four
bar code

That there are no official documents inside is actually the least surprising thing about this Publisher's Clearing House-like missive.  What's almost shocking is that I, a life-long Democrat, have ostensibly been chosen to represent Republicans in a Congressional battle-ground state.  Really?  Am I supposed to conclude that the Republican National Committee is really stupid?  Or is this, perhaps, an effort to generate doubt about the upcoming real Constitution-mandated census and suppress participation ahead of time?

The part of the first missive not visible from out side clearly identifies it as

2009 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CENSUS

Commissioned by the Republican Party

Representing Congressional
District
: New Hampshire # 1

Census Tracking Code:
#N09P1041

Please Respond By:
November 16, 2009

Over the fold, there's an explanation.

Your Participation Is Greatly Needed and Appreciated:

Strengthening our Party for the 2009-2010 elections will take a massive grassroots effort.  As a key facet of our overall campaign strategy, the Republican Party is conducting a Census of Congressional Districts all across America.  The opinions registered in this document will be used to help ensure that our Republican leaders and candidates are specifically addressing those issues most important to voters in your area.

Instructions: Please answer all questions to the best of your ability.  All individual responses will be kept confidential and only survey tallies will be shared with our Congressional leaders and candidates.  When finished answering your Census, please return it along with your generous contribution in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.  Thank you.

Nice and polite.  Then this faux census goes into the typical political profile/survey format we recognize from what every political consultant outfit sends out.  I'm not going to cover them all, but number 3. caught my eye.  In response to the question, "did you cast a vote in the following elections--2008 Presidential Contest, 2006 Mid-Term Elections" the choice is "yes," "no" and "unsure."  Also noteworthy is the reference to the Presidential election as a "contest."

Some questions are clearly "loaded"--e.g. "Do you think things in this country are generally going in the wrong direction, or do you feel things are starting to improve?"  Thinking is associated with "wrong," while improvement is a feeling.

On the other hand, feelings are also important when we come to Democrats.  "Do you feel that the trillion-dollar solutions the Democrats have advanced to boost our economy will help or hurt our nation in the long run?"

Given that eight years of Republican rule have run the economy into the ditch and tax cuts obviously haven't worked, you'd think they would tweak this standard survey form, if it is really directed at Republicans, and remove "Would you like Congress to pass additional tax cuts to further stimulate our nation's economy?" As if the economy weren't heading into the ditch fast enough already!

Finally, in the DOMESTIC ISSUES section it is revealed that "to embrace social issues" means:
School prayer
Ban burning of the flag
Ban human cloning
Faith based initiatives
Ban all abortions
Prohibit homosexual marriage

Which I guess could be summed up as "Repeal the Bill of Rights"

The Fourth page of this faux document, in addition to raising "concern" and "worry," is mostly about how to send money, if only $15 "to help defray the cost of processing my Census Document."

Also included in the packet is a three-page letter from Michael Steele himself.  On the first page he claims that

Your registered Census is one of a select few being mailed into New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District.
Because of your high level of political involvement and steadfast commitment to the Republican party, your personal input on the questions presented in your Census Document is critical to our Party's future.

He's got that half right.

Also right on page two is the assertion that

This is a crucial time in our Party's and our nation's history.

And on page three, the Chairman, depending on the likes of me to send money, if that's the true agenda, lays out the parameters of failure:

In the coming months, the RNC must engage in recruitment, opposition research, voter identification and grassroots organizing.  And we must use the latest technology to lay the groundwork to execute our campaign plans.

By subverting the 2010 Census--is that the plan?

On the other hand, I do appreciate him spelling out "the noble principles this great country was founded on--unobtrusive government and individual liberty."  That would account for secret deals and crooks who don't get caught.

"Noble principles," "high level" and "select few" are, of course, all phrases designed to appeal to individuals whose sense of self-worth needs a boost.  No doubt, that's also the import of the "First Class" stamp on the "No Postage Necessary" return envelope, whose PO Box number doesn't actually comport with either the street address or the zip, most probably because, as usual, some direct mail operation is looking to get fat off the donations.  All just part and parcel of the disdain for the electorate that Republican political operatives typically display.

Maybe they can't help it.  Maybe, rather than deceptive, Michael Steele's Republican Party is just delusional.  After all, he's still on a mission to "empower the people of this nation--not the government" and still hasn't noticed that the Constitution already does that. Clearly, the party of situational awareness Republicans are not.

Originally posted to hannah on Tue Oct 27, 2009 at 06:31 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (15+ / 0-)

    How do you tell a predator from a protector? The predator will eat you sooner rather than later.

    by hannah on Tue Oct 27, 2009 at 06:31:36 AM PDT

    •  I hope that you gave them something to think (0+ / 0-)

      about with your response.  Or at least got their stamp off their envelope to reuse so this would not be a complete waste for you.

      That passed by; this can, too. - Deor

      by stevie avebury on Tue Oct 27, 2009 at 06:40:34 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  This is a fishing expedition. (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        wu ming, myboo, Just Bob

        Names and addresses of individuals and households whose political and social interests are known are a valuable commodity.  The information will be sold to commercial and issues organizations and generate revenue for the RNC every time it's used.  
        Ditto for on-line surveys.  

        The reason they can risk antagonizing people is because angry people tend to respond at a greater rate than people who like what they hear.

        Glenn Beck is obnoxious for a reason.

        How do you tell a predator from a protector? The predator will eat you sooner rather than later.

        by hannah on Tue Oct 27, 2009 at 06:48:00 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  The head of the Democratic Party in my (5+ / 0-)

    city received one of these, too, and immediately posted it on his wife's website so that people would know how low the Republican Party has sunk.  This is a fund-raising tactic masquerading as a "census."  I remember receiving an email from the McCain/Palin Team last year, begging for money, and wondered how they got hold of my email address since I only donated to Obama.  I've been a democrat since I cast my first vote in 1972.  The republicans are some low creatures.  

    •  Very Republican-like answers might just establish (0+ / 0-)

      a pipeline to skewing their internal polls and/or providing material for many fairly interesting diaries.  I've been tossing things that sound a bit like this,but may not do so anymore.  Every bit that their information is off is on the plus side.

      i've been getting robocalls to tell me to vote no on a ballot question about posting public notices ALSO on the city web site.  It would seem that that is the first step to hiding notices from the public.  i've told the recording that I'm voting yes just because of the robocall.  Idiots left time for comment.  only problem is in havingthe drone by waiting for the response time.  

      Medicare for all! Go with what is and has been working.

      by maybeeso in michigan on Tue Oct 27, 2009 at 07:25:22 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Fix the $00.80 (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Chi

    to 00.08 and you have an excellent diary. Recc'ed in advance of correction.

    We have only just begun and none too soon.

    by global citizen on Tue Oct 27, 2009 at 06:44:58 AM PDT

  •  We got this in S.C., too. (0+ / 0-)

    My husband and I each got this same mailing. I did what I always do with these things: I answer some of the questions (from a progressive Dem POV), indicate in the amount-donated slot that I'm giving $0.00, write on the top of the letter "This was unsolicited and is unwanted," stuff every piece of paper they sent me into their postage-paid envelope, and send it on its way.

    So they've paid something to send this mailing to me and something to get it back. You'd think they'd catch on eventually.

    •  Interest-oriented verified mailing lists are (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      DustyMathom, myboo, Just Bob

      a gold-mine.  Your address can be sold to commercial and financial entities and, in addition to getting a steady stream of revenue from the sale, will know where not to target future propaganda efforts.

      Only the federal government is obligated to keep individual information private.  The RNC has no such obligation.  Neither, of course, does the DNC.  You may recall that there was a big kerfuffle when Howard Dean went to the DNC that he refused to bring his DFA list with him.  Also that McAuliffe had taken the DNC list to the DLC.

      How do you tell a predator from a protector? The predator will eat you sooner rather than later.

      by hannah on Tue Oct 27, 2009 at 07:44:06 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Ummm...isn't it illegal (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hannah, myboo, NovatoBon

    to impersonate or otherwise fabricate census documents?

    "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --M. L. King "You can't fix stupid" --Ron White

    by zenbassoon on Tue Oct 27, 2009 at 08:09:18 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site