Skip to main content

Congress today questioned the president of the peanut company blamed for the salmonella outbreak that has thus far sickened at least 600 people, more than half of them children, and may have killed at least 8 people (while the congressional hearing was taking place, a possible 9th death was reported).  Peanut Corporation of America President Stewart Parnell refused to answer questions from the House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, citing his right against self-incrimination under the 5th Amendment of the Constitution.  Based on the internal company documents the Subcommittee members showed him during the hearing, it appears there is plenty of incriminating evidence out there.

One particularly egregious e-mail shows Parnell complaining about lost profits while the federal government investigated the peanut-related salmonella outbreak.  The e-mail said the time required to deal with contaminated products, some of which had been shipped, was "costing us huge $$$$."  In another e-mail, sent on Jan. 19, Parnell sent a message to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, pleading with the agency to let it stay in business.  He wrote that company executives "desperately at least need to turn the raw peanuts on our floor into money."

It is certainly an outrage and a tragedy that people have lost their lives or been sickened because executives cared more about putting peanut products into the market for profit than ensuring their food products were safe.  At the hearing today, Jeffrey Almer of Savage, Minn., described how his elderly mother survived lung cancer, a brain tumor, and other illnesses—and then she died from salmonella poisoning.  "Cancer couldn’t claim her but peanut butter did," said Almer.

Adding insult to this horrible injury, a recent judicial opinion raises the possibility that American tax dollars may be used to compensate Peanut Corp. for the profits it lost in (eventually) complying with the recalls and other restrictions placed on its products as a result of the salmonella scare.  As I have discussed here, the Federal Circuit is currently considering the Rose Acre Farms v. United States appeal, which presents the question of whether the United States must compensate Rose Acre Farms more than $5.4 million under the Takings Clause due to temporary food safety restrictions imposed after Rose Acre’s eggs caused hundreds of people to suffer salmonella poisoning.

It sounds crazy, but the lower court in Rose Acre actually concluded that, "[o]n balance, plaintiff’s severe economic loss and reasonable investment expectation outweigh government’s attempt to prevent the spread of salmonella," and found that the government was required to compensate Rose Acre.  To borrow from a Saturday Night Live sketch: really?

No doubt, Peanut Corp is losing profits from the recall of products containing its peanuts and its temporary inability to continue to sell these peanut products, as Rose Acre lost some profits when the government sought to prevent its salmonella-tainted eggs from poisoning more Americans.  And sure, peanut butter sales are down 25%, but that’s because Americans, understandably enough, don’t want to risk sending their kids off to school with a peanut-butter-and-salmonella sandwich in their lunch box.  But is it really the point of the Takings Clause, which provides that private property shall not "be taken for public use, without just compensation," to force the government to compensate companies for profits lost as a result of complying with valid federal food safety regulations?

I hope the Federal Circuit will have the good sense not to take Takings Clause jurisprudence down that path.  As the ongoing peanut product health scare has shown, we need the government to focus even more on protecting public health and safety, not worry about whether a necessary food recall will create a compensable taking for lost profits.  It’s also past time for corporate America to take responsibility for its actions, instead of looking for the government to pay up every time corporate misconduct causes profits to go down.

Originally posted at Text & History. Elizabeth Wydra is Chief Counsel for the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC).

Originally posted to Elizabeth Wydra on Wed Feb 11, 2009 at 02:05 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site