Skip to main content

I know there are a number of fitness/exercise diaries that are regularly published. I have always wanted to do a series of diaries that go into some aspects of exercise physiology to help people make better choices. I hesitated starting in the past, because I wasn't sure I would have the time to keep up with it. However, now that I have become recently unemployed, I have all the time in the world ;-(

For me, it also represents a type of therapy as I work through this challenging period.

I am going to keep this fairly simple, and to give practical suggestions on how these scientific principles can be applied to your fitness program. My backgroud: Masters in Exercise Physiology; Certified Exercise Specialist by the American College of Sports Medicine; worked as clinical exercise physiologist, cardiac rehabilitation manager, fitness manager for large, hospital-based wellness center; have written a number of articles on fitness and health-related topics and participated in an "Ask the Trainer" website for a large healthcare corporation.

Volume 1 starts with the basic principle that underlies all exercise training: The Stress-Response-Adaptation Principle, sometimes known at General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS). Quite simply, this means that physiological systems respond to appropriate stimuli. Repeated stimuli, or stresses, frequently lead to adaptations.

Not all stimuli have the desired response. Too little stress, and no adaptation occurs. Too much stress, and negative adaptation occurs, i.e. overtraining or injury. So the purpose of any exercise training is to apply the appropriate amount of stress to force the body to adapt in ways that are positive and increase one's functional capacity (or fitness). In other words, your body will do what you ask it to do.

The effectiveness of a stressor, or training stimulus, in creating a postive adaptive response is specific to the individual and is relative to any given point in time or level of conditioning. Obviously, a workout that might result in improvement for a sedentary 60-year old adult would be useless for an Olympic marathon runner. But it also means that the workout that was effective for that 60-year old in week 2 may no longer be as effective in week 4 or 5 and certainly will not be effective in week 11 or 12.

A workout plan--or training stimulus, or exercise precription--is usually described according to the following: Type, Intensity, Frequency, and Duration.

Type refers to the type of activity chosen: running, walking, cyling, lifting.

Intensity refers to the effort level required to mobilize the systems and processes within the organism and move it from the current "status quo" or homeostasis.

Frequency and Duration are the degree and frequency that the simulus is applied, enough to result in the adaptations necessary so that the body can perform at a higher level.

Since this diary is about stress-response, I will focus on intensity. As I mentioned earlier, the training stimulus must be sufficient to initiate adaptaton, but not so intense that it leads to breakdown. I often use a scene from the old I Love Lucy show as an example. Lucy and Ethel take jobs at a candy manufacturer. They are responsible for taking the individual candies that are coming down a conveyor belt and packing them into candy boxes. At first the belt is moving slowly and there are few candies, so they are able to easily keep up. The belt then starts to move more quickly and more candies appear. Lucy and Ethel become increasingly frantic and disorganized, and finally the entire operation falls apart.

The opening scene on the belt is your body at rest in its current state of fitness. It can easily handle what you ask it to do. The first modest increase represents a training stimulus. The women had to work harder and move faster to keep up, but they were able to do so, even though they weren't as coordinated or efficient as they could have been. As the belt speed and candy volume increased even more, they could keep up for short stretches, but grew increasingly frantic in their movements and fell further and further behind. At max speed and volume, everything fell apart.

This is what happens to your body during exercise. The first modest increase in intensity causes you to work harder and be more focused. Repeating that stimulus will result in the body adapting to that workload and becoming more coordinated and more efficient. Going to the second higher level, the body can keep up for short periods, but not for very long. To perform at this intensity, the time interval needs to be short, followed by recovery. This is what is known as interval training, and can be a useful strategy. At the highest, all-out level, a beginner will not be able to keep up--internal systems will go haywire. This is when injuries and other adverse medical events can occur.

How do you measure intensity? Two common methods are heart rate and perceived exertion.

Many exercisers are familiar with the concept of heart rate monitoring. In short, while performing cardiovascular exercise, heart rate is a good gauge of intensity--i.e., the harder you work, the higher the heart rate. There are a variety of formulae for determining ideal heart rate training ranges. The most common is to subtract your age from 220 (220-age) and use that number for your Maximum Heart Rate (HRmax). Exercise heart rate is then calculated as a percentage of HRmax.

A more accurate method is the Heart Rate Reserve (HRR). You still estimate HRmax the same as before, but now you also include Resting Heart Rate (HRrest). HRrest is best measured first thing in the morning while at "rest". To determine your HRR training rate, do the following:

  1. Calculate estimated HRmax (220-age)
  1. Measure HRrest.
  1. Calculate HRreserve: (HRmax-HRrest)=HRreserve
  1. Calculate desired intensity percentage of HRreserve: For 60% effort: (HRreserve x .60)
  1. Add that result back to HRrest to determine 60% training heart rate.

Example: 50 year old with a resting heart rate of 60 who wants to work out at a 60% intensity. HRmax=160 (220-60). HRreserve=100 (160-resting HR of 60). 60% of HRreserve=60. Add that back to HRrest and you get a 60% training heart rate of 120 beats per minute.

I like to do heart rate monitoring, and I monitor mine during my workouts, but it takes some experience and insight to really make it effective. I will go into more detail in the next diary, but suffice to say, there are many variables involved with heart rate and you really need to learn about YOUR specific response to exercise before you can use it most effectively.

Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) is an effective tool. As the name implies, you pay attention to your general sense of exertion and use an RPE scale to assess your effort level. The most common RPE scale is the Borg Perceived Exertion scale. It looks like this:

6 No exertion at all

7 Extremely light

8

9 Very light - (easy walking slowly at a comfortable pace)

10

11 Light

12

13 Somewhat hard (It is quite an effort; you feel tired but can continue)

14

15 Hard (heavy)

16

17 Very hard (very strenuous, and you are very fatigued)

18

19 Extremely hard (You can not continue for long at this pace)

20 Maximal exertion

Sometimes you will see a modified version of the Borg scale, listed as a 1 to 10 scale, but I prefer the original.

The scale also corresponds to what is often called the "talk test". The idea is that you should exercise at a level where you can comfortably carry on a conversation (although the listener should be able to tell you are exerting yourself) but not sing a song. If you can only talk with extra effort, that might be an intensity level too high--or certainly higher than you need to be for general health and fitness.

The "conversational level" of exertion corresponds to 12-14 on the Borg scale, the "extra effort level" with 15-17. A beginner can see results at 9-11.

For strength training, the most common measure of intensity is a percentage of the maximum weight you can lift one time--referred to as a 1 Repetition Maximum or 1RM. Since it is not advisable for beginners to perform a 1RM lift, we estimate it by saying your lifting weight should be the amount of weight you can lift 12-15 times while maintaining good form. The 15th rep should be the last one you could do. This is for beginners. More experienced recreational lifters should work at a higher intensity--i.e. at weight that you can lift at least 8 times, but no more than 12. (Again, there are a lot of variations to this that will be addressed in the next volume).

So what does this mean in practical terms?

First of all, if you are beginning an exercise program--or returning from a layoff due to injury, illness, or sloth--you don't have to work that hard to see improvement. A 40% intensity level for 15-20 minutes is enough. At this level, you can work out every day or even twice a day. If 15-20 of sustained activity is too much, then break it into several intervals with 1-2 minutes of recovery. For a beginner, working harder does not get you into shape any faster--it just hurts more.

After about 12 weeks, if not sooner, you should increase the minimum intensity to 55%-65%.

A regular exerciser must be aware that, as the body adapts to a certain level of effort, the intensity, frequency, or duration must be changed/increased in order to see continued improvement (if that is your goal). Exercisers should include variety in their workout routines--do some mild interval training, some harder, shorter workouts, some cross training--to vary the training stimulus so that the body can continue to adapt. A common mistake for experienced exercisers is to get stuck in the same routine. For those who are exercise-averse, these variations do not have to be severe or uncomfortable--interval training doesn't mean running wind sprints--just different enough to provide an alternate stimulus.

The biggest mistake that beginning strength trainers make is to stay at the same weight level and just do more reps. I have seen this with many people, especially adults over 40. They start a routine, and then after 3-4 months they are still lifing the exact same weight--just lifting it 20 times instead of 8-12 or 12-15. Whatever your intensity level, once you can comfortably lift the weight the max number of times with good form, you must increase the weight to continue to progress.

It is also helpful to vary your strength training routine on a regular basis, to go through "cycles" of intensity or modality. Example: rotate through cycles of selectorized machines, free weights, or cable machines. You'll get better overall results and be less prone to boredom or injuries.

In summary:

  1. The body repsponds to external stimuli--it will do what you ask it to do.
  1. "Fitness" is a dynamic condition, so you want to have the right routine for your goals, medical history, and level of conditioning.
  1. You don't have to kill yourself to see results, but you must maintain a focus and purpose to your workouts.

Here is a list of upcoming topics:

Vol 2: Cardiovascular and Muscular Adaptations to Exercise
Vol 3: Specificity of Training
Vol 4: "Fitness" vs Health--what do those studies mean?
Vol 5: Exercise Myths

Based on poll results, I will go into either more or less detail on each item.

Originally posted to Azdak on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 10:33 AM PST.

Poll

I consider my current fitness level to be:

30%13 votes
14%6 votes
4%2 votes
45%19 votes
4%2 votes
0%0 votes

| 42 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips for more than one kind of stimulus. (15+ / 0-)

    If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible...tonight is your answer.

    by Azdak on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 10:34:17 AM PST

  •  I added the 'teaching' tag (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fezzik, BYw, dot farmer, Kat08

    so this diary will be in "Daily Kos University" which opens every Saturday at 9 AM Eastern, but stays open all week.

    No fees, no tests, no grades.... just learning!

  •  I lift weights (0+ / 0-)

    on a regular basis.  And I do some cardio, but cardio is hard for me because of very bad knees.  Even swimming hurts my knees (in fact, being in a tub hurts them, as well).  The best I've found for my knees is recumbent bike with the 'cuffs' off.

    OTOH, I do a lot of weights.  Today, I did chest, back and abs.

  •  May I link to this for my series? (0+ / 0-)

    It'll publish tonight (on rattlesnake avoidance, fwiw).  My series is evolving into an outdoors oriented series, since that's what I like :).  You might also want to be a guest contributor at Fitness Mondays.

    I'm in training for a half marathon right now, and my non-running exercise is getting short shrift, alas.

    Healthy Minds in Healthy Bodies, now discussing fitness Tuesdays at 6 PM PST

    by indigoblueskies on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 10:43:53 AM PST

  •  We Should Probably Add an Age Caution: (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    BYw

    I've been an aggressive player and also a teacher of instrumental music for some 40 years.

    One thing I've seen in older learners, which I'm now experiencing in the fitness arena as I near age 60, is that muscles degrade with age nonuniformly.

    In my 20's and 30's I found I could take most any arbitrary strenuous act and try it near whatever stress level was peak for the muscles that are obviously mainly involved in it.

    Looking at my adult instrument learners as well as my present efforts to resume fitness training, I find that's no longer so.

    My legs for example could push X pounds on a machine set up to work my thighs. But WARNING-- back and pelvis muscles that only moderately supportive of the leg exercise but crucial to posture nonetheless might by now be a whole lot weaker, proportionately, than they'd been when I was younger.

    So I'd say for people who've been sedentary and/or are in mid to late middle age or older, it's probably very important to start stress exercising at significantly lower impact than a younger person of the same apparent "strength" could tolerate.

    Over the past year or so I've accidentally discovered more isolated back, gut, pelvis, shoulder, finger and toe muscles than I ever thought existed in the human body.

    And if one of these more out-of-the-way loners takes a notion to cramp half a day after you worked out, it can be the very devil to come up with a way to treat it other than knocking your entire self loopy with muscle relaxing pills or some other unduly broad brush treatment.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 10:44:11 AM PST

    •  Agree-- (0+ / 0-)

      I referred to that a little bit, but not in as much detail. I was trying to keep this focused on the science and not as much on workout routines. There are other exercise diaries that are addressing those in more detail.

      But this is good feedback and I will incoporate in future diaries when applicable.

      If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible...tonight is your answer.

      by Azdak on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 04:31:18 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  trainer or not? gym or not? (0+ / 0-)

    I'd be interested in your opinion about how essential a trainer is. I've had a couple and their knowledge varied greatly. Mainly I didn't think either one varied my routine enough (that's more work for them of course) so I didn't get as much out of it as I could (and of course it is pretty expensive!). Can I reasonably do it myself?

    Also, do you think you need to belong to a gym or is a home workout with free weights okay?

    •  Trainer can be helpful, but not always.... (0+ / 0-)

      Unfortunately, the quality level of trainers varies tremendously. Some are knowledgeable and dedicated, others are just "exercise buddies". A guy who stands there with a clipboard and counts your reps is NOT a trainer.

      Some are knowledgeable and dedicated, but only with certains types of populations.

      I'm not sure what to tell you. It's best to spend some time talking to the trainer or to the manager who assigns the trainers and find out as much as you can about their background and experience with people of your age and fitness level.

      If you are a beginner, there is not as much that a trainer can do for you on a daily basis. I always worked with a client for 2-4 straight sessions, they periodically afterward--once a week or once every 2 weeks. The first sessions were to make sure they followed proper form and structured the workout properly. Then I gave them time to master those basics and make some improvement before getting together so that I could push them to the next level.

      So whether you need one or not depends on how well you know your body and what your goals are. A trainer is useful for starting a lifting routine, to teach you proper form and alignment. That CAN save a beginner a lot of time and misdirected effort. If you feel comfortable with that and are doing a more basic routine--say on weight stack machines--then you should be able to manage your own program.

      If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible...tonight is your answer.

      by Azdak on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 04:58:04 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  recognizing overtraining (0+ / 0-)

    I'd be interested in learning how to recognize over-training. My 15 year old son plays high level soccer and just started track workouts. He could end up having ten strenuous workouts a week with no off day. I want to know what to watch for besides tiredness that doesn't seem to respond to rest.

    I wish over-training was a problem for me, but under-training is more my issue!

    •  I'll see what I can do.... (0+ / 0-)

      It's really hard with teen-age athletes for a couple of reasons. One is that their ability to tolerate the physical training and recover is so much greater than the average adult, the adult guidelines aren't as appplicable. Normally, an elevated resting heart rate, increased irritability, reduced physical performance are all signs of overtraining, but they are harder to see in kids--especially high school students whose lives are chaotic to begin with.

      The coaches don't help--they often seem oblivious to the signs. My stepdaughter played freshman basketaball this year. Near the end of the season, they had a solid string of games and practices. They played on a Thursday night and had a tournament in a town 40 miles away starting early Saturday morning. The girls played the Thursday night game like zombies--they barely won against a team they had beaten by 25 points two weeks earlier. What did the coach do? Scheduled a practice for 6 AM on Friday morning. I couldn't believe it, but there was nothing I could do.

      The best thing you can do is to make sure he is eating properly. A 15 y.o. doing that level of work is going to burn a huge amount of calories--maybe 3500 to 4000 a day, maybe more. Kids tend to eat junk. He should be eating a small meal or modest snack consisting of protein and complex carbs within 45 min after workouts--even if its just a couple of performance bars (need to check the composition so that they are not all carbs). He also needs to have quality snacks if there is a longer interval between end of school and practice/game/meet. Kids can't eat lunch at 11 or 12 and then go without until a 4 or 5 pm practice or game.

      Unfortunately, you won't be able to modify his practice routine, so food and rest and hydration are the best things you can offer.

      If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible...tonight is your answer.

      by Azdak on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 04:48:49 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  scrolled right off (0+ / 0-)

    I hope this diary will get rescued. you put a lot of work into it and it deserves more time and responses than you got. This site is really like drinking from a fire hose, for sure!

    •  I wasn't sure how to time it.... (0+ / 0-)

      I was afraid if I did it on a weekend it would conflict w/other diaries and I didn't want to take an evening spot--to me those should should go to the more political entries.

      I'll provide links with the future diaries, so people can go back to it if they want.

      If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible...tonight is your answer.

      by Azdak on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 04:37:45 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks for the diary. (0+ / 0-)

    I started to do super slow this year and have gotten very good results with relatively short and infrequent workouts.  The idea is that you move the weights very slowly, 10-15 seconds for the positive and another 10-15 for the negative with no locking out at top or resting at bottom.  I only need a few reps to get to exhaustion.  

    I don't know if it would work with someone who wanted to get very big, but works for me.  

    Thanks again.  

    •  Whatever works is good--one caution re SS.... (0+ / 0-)

      My experience is that Super Slow adherents tend to be almost cult-like in their approach to this style of training. They dismiss all other methods and have a "one true religion" outlook on training.

      I will address some of this when talking about specficity of training and exercise myths, but just be aware that there are a number of effective training methods. Stick with what works for you--I am not knocking super slow--just be wary if any of the more advanced practioners tell you it's the ONLY way to train.

      If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible...tonight is your answer.

      by Azdak on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 04:36:00 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I agree, ... (0+ / 0-)

        It seems to me that the total time under load may be a factor too.  With six reps at 30 seconds a rep that's 3 minutes under load which is probably about equal to three sets with other systems.  So I may not be working less, but just shorter elapsed time.

  •  In your calculation of HRR (0+ / 0-)

    was there a math error or did I not understand the calculation correctly?  It seems that you calculated HRmax as 160, yet the formula of 220 minus age would result in an HRmax of 170, which would ultimately yield a training rate of 126 beats per minute rather than 120 beats per minute.  Do I have that right or have I missed something?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site