As you all know, the Vermont legislators overrode Gov Jim Douglas's veto a few days ago to become the first state to legalize same sex marriage through the legislative process. What do the Freepers have to say about this TRAVESTY? Read on!
Well, add Vermont to the list of useless states I won’t spend any money in again.
What will Vermont ever do without Freepers spending their money there?!
Wouldn’t expect anything different from Vermont. Too bad such a beautiful state has to be infected with socialists.
Now you know how we feel about Alaska.
not surprising the homo’s have been invading that state for years.
They now Will move their money to other states and pick those states off
ME, NH,NY, NJ, RI,IL,Ohio, WA,OR,CO, all take note
homo’s coming to a state near you
no matter how may states they get it in which will never be mine then AI along with my kids will never accept them as married nor are they normal
I would like to see polygimists get their marriage in those states now
hey why not, lets see if the liberals and homo’s think that religious group should have their marriage and so called rights
That should be our new slogan "Homos! Coming to a state near you!"
shame that VT was once the most conservative state in the union but it comes a time when those few conservatives left have to say , time to move out and move on
my wife got out of MA and now we are down here in the south we make our votes count, our state gets our money and it does not go to liberal agenda’s and we helped to get the constitutional change to the FL state constitution.
infact get all conservatives out of the New England area and if one million people moved out and moved south then the laws can be changed for ever to stop liberals
CA, is lost so two million conservatives move out to CO,NM,AZ and it changes the game and political landscape not to mention who would now pay for their liberal agenda’s
Please do. It would be like a mini secession!
..Anyone else still want to insist that we don’t need a constitutional amendment?
Good luck with that.
EVERY POLIGIMIST NOW SHOULD BE GETTING THEIR MARRAGE LEGALISED AS SHOULD THE WHACK JOBS WHO WANT TO MARRY THEIR DOG
Will you homo’s back that marriage and say it is their right.
Only until those groups do this then people will wake up and say enough is enough,
one man and woman is marriage , nothing else is close to marriage
I've always wanted to marry my dog...
Yep. Look for Maine, Rhode Island and New Hampshire to turn soon. New Hampshire is heartbreaking to me... NH was pretty solid a Red State not that long ago, but I think it's gone forever, no turning back. Too many Massachusetts voters migrated to NH (to escape high taxes no less), and have infected the state like a cancer.
It's only a matter of time that hubby and I are outta Connecticut for good. CT going gay was like the final nail in the coffin... the people had no vote over it, one activist judge decided it was "time to get with the times". The high taxes are killing us as well. Just a matter of time...
Go Massachusetts!
And that’s why we need a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex "marriage." Personally, I’d be willing to make a deal with the ‘rats in congress to the effect "we’ll let you put FOCA in the constitution if you give us a "one man/one woman marriage amendment". I think the ‘rats would be happy to throw the pooves under the bus for a deal like that. Sure, it sucks having FOCA enshrined in the Constitution, but abortion is a fait accomplit—even if Roe v. Wade went the other way it still would be (with just a few more limitations). Same-sex "marriage" is far more corrosive to the cohesivenss of the family structure than anything else imaginable.
uh oh... Do I feel a pie fight coming for that remark?
Um, what? Banning gay marriage between consenting adults is so important that we should enshrine the slaughter of innocents in our Constitution? What kind of sense does that make? The trade you suggest is sick.
It's on now!
Yes. Abortion has always been with us EVEN WHEN IT WAS ILLEGAL. Even during the 50s it was somewhere in the six-figures (exact estimates are impossible since it was illegal virtually everywhere). But same-sex "marriage" will turn the marital institution into a laughinstock—it has already done so in Western Europe. If two people of the same sex can "marry", young people will say, then what’s the point of marriage. They’ll see it as a pointless exercise; less work to just "shack up."
Are the homophobes throwing the "pro-life" klansmen under the bus?
I've never understood this. The cohesiveness and structure of my family is only threatened by my own inability to maintain them.
Predict ban in 3..2...1...
Are you suggesting that society should NOT promote stable monogamy between loving couples? Do you have an argument against gay marriage that doesn't boil down to "homos shouldn't marry because it's icky"? Can you tell me exactly how my marriage is worth less because of it?
Predict banning in...oh, wait, it's too late.
This account has been banned or suspended.
so what, I don’;t care if it goes back a thousand years
it doesn’t change how I think
you might like sucking on another man and you might like sticking your penis up him before hand but many in this country, sorry the majority in this country find you sick and certainly weird /
heheheh
I find your fixation on the specifics of male homosexual sex somewhat telling. Almost as much as your immediate and unfounded assumption that I am a homosexual.
I care not a whit about changing what you think. I merely asked you to explain how a marriage between two consenting adults had any direct effect on the marriage between two other consenting adults.
That you chose instead to post another explicit description of man-on-man sex acts might be the best answer you can give.
Ouch! Owned
The Freepi are getting desperate. They see "Bush country" turning into ruin before their very eyes. Let's continue to observe this magnificent species trying to adapt to their new environment.