Daily Kos

My interview with Cindy Sheehan

Digg this! Share this on Twitter - My interview with Cindy SheehanTweet this submit to reddit

Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 03:53:13 PM PDT

A few days ago I interviewed Cindy Sheehan, half as an blogger and half as an interested citizen activist.  Below the fold is the audio of the interview.  I’ve also typed up a brief summary of the interview, or at least what I could write down of her answers while holding a tape recorder in my other hand.  I’ll be posting a picture of both of us that a press photographer took if it makes it into a local newspaper, or if he sends me any pictures.

She talked about her political future, taking action locally, prosecuting Bush, Afghanistan, and more.  I had previously taken questions here and on a few other websites.

Note:  This interview was originally posted to independentpoliticalreport.com, a blog I write for that focuses on third party politics.  That's why a lot of the questions have to do with third party politics (duh), but there are also some great questions from Daily Kos users, so I figured I'd post it here.

The theme of the talk that Ms. Sheehan gave before taking questions and the interview was that local action is the best way to change the status quo for the better.  "Work where you’re gonna make a difference," she said.  "Work where you can celebrate victory!"  She continued on that she had tried practically every method she could think of in order to take on "the establishment" head-on, but now she realizes that taking it on head-on on a large scale simply isn’t the answer.

I started by asking Ms. Sheehan about the National Initiative for Democracy, and I will not hide the fact that I’m a staunch advocate for national ballot initiatives.  I do volunteer work with Mike Gravel and his Democracy Foundation for this cause.

Click here to listen to the Cindy Sheehan interview.

Below are summaries of what she said, not her exact words. Some of the questions were submitted by commenters, some might have been slightly rephrased.  Phrases that I wrote down word for word are in quotes.

What’s your opinion of the National Initiative for Democracy?
I like the idea of a more direct democracy, but you can look at Prop 8 for an example of what can go wrong with initiatives.  I’m conflicted about this.

Do you still live in San Francisco?  Do you have any political plans in that city or elsewhere?
Yes, I still live in San Francisco.  I plan on moving soon because it’s expensive and I want a simpler life.  If I ever ran for office again, it would be federal office.

Do you have any plans to go to Minnesota soon?
No, but I would love to if someone could organize a visit.

When you ran for Congress, why did you run as an independent, instead of running with the ballot-qualified Green or Peace and Freedom Parties?

I wanted to run for office in a "non-partisan way."  Our slogan was "people over politics," and I wanted to live that out by being "tied down to any ideology.

What kind of future do you see for yourself within existing third parties?  Will you be attending the Green Party national convention this July?
"None" - no future within existing third parties.  I’m booked for July already.

Why are you the leader of a separate anti-war movement, rather than working with Obama and the Democrats in power to reach your goals?
The Democrats and Obama aren’t anti-war.

What was it like to see your perception among the mainstream left/Democrats go from paragon of motherly virtue and innocence to that of some kind of pariah in just two years?
The Democrats used the peace movement, and what they think "doesn’t matter to me."  I am "speaking the truth" and the "person that matters most to me is me."  I don’t step back just because a Democrat is in power.

Do you have any regrets from the past five years?
I have one regret - during the summer of 2005 I wish I was more aware of efforts to co-opt the peace movement in order to elect Democrats and more able to fight them off.

Is there something that most progressives or liberals who criticize you fail to understand about you?

Progressives who criticize me aren’t real progressives.  I’ve come up with a name for them:  faux-gressives.

What have you learned about the media, and getting a message out nationally, since you started your activism?

I used to think that the media is right-wing, but now I realize that the mainstream media simply exists to serve the establishment.

After your congressional run last year you mentioned forming a new political party.  Has any progress been made with that?
I’m focused more now on political action on a local level.  Many local elections are actually non-partisan.  If there is going to be a new, successful, progressive party it will have to be "organic" and organized around labor.  Unfortunately, labor union leaders are in bed with the Democrats.

You are against Obama’s plan for a kind of surge in Afghanistan.  What would you propose as an alternative to that policy?

I would bring the troops home and use dollar diplomacy to promote things like jobs.  There is "no US military solution in the Middle East."  If I were president, I would release the torture photos and prosecute the previous administration, as well.

One of the chapters in your new e-book is called "Myth 2:  Elections Matter."  Are you writing off elections entirely, or do you think that with significant reforms - like an alternative voting system and reliable paper ballots - they could be meaningful again?
Elections have always been compromised because they’re easily manipulated.  We need things like instant runoff voting, paper ballots, public campaign financing, and term limits.

If we had a strong initiative process, would term limits still be necessary?
Term limits keep out career politicians and open up public office to more people.  They perform a valuable service.

You ran against Nancy Pelosi because she wouldn’t impeach Bush and Cheney.  Now that they’re out of office, are you hopeful that they will somehow be held accountable?
I also left the Democratic Party and ran for Congress because of other issues they disappointed me with, like how they still funded the wars.  I’m "still waiting for accountability."  Prosecution would also limit the powers of future presidents in a very good way, although I’m not hopeful it will happen.  That doesn’t mean I will stop working for it.

Note/update:  FYI, I'm going to camp then vacation, and I'll probably only be on the computer once or twice until mid August.  I leave tomorrow.  Just a heads up for anyone who cares.

Poll

What's your opinion of Cindy Sheehan

28%37 votes
22%29 votes
18%24 votes
3%5 votes
20%26 votes
5%7 votes

| 128 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Cindy Sheehan, interview, Mike Gravel, democracy, elections, Afghanistan (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 100 comments

  •  Tips/flames (30+ / 0-)

    It was pretty cool to go out there and meet this woman who's a historical figure.  She came off as very smart and honest, if you're wondering.  And those of you who think her approach is stupid will probably be happy to learn about her new focus on local action.

    •  I am going to meet Cindy in MA next week (9+ / 0-)


      Cindy Sheehan has remarkable courage and ability to cut through the bullsh*t that is generated from both political Parties.

      She deserves credit for galvanizing the whole movement against the Iraq War, and bursting the bubble of Bush's popularity when she camped out near Bush's "ranch" and challenged him to explain the rationale for the War.  This also exposed the cowardice of the U.S. News media, which had refused up until that point to challenge the Bush administration on their Foreign policy (madness).

      But some people here turned on her for having criticized the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates. Yet the truth is that the Democratic Party and candidates never did anything with their Election mandate to change the direction of the disgraceful Foreign Policy.

      They could have stopped the Wars way back in 2006 by starving off the War funding (the same way that the Vietnam War was forced to wind down), by not sending up new funding bills (to either sign or veto).  They certainly could have made a major wholesale shift after the 2008 Election with control of all three branches, but once again all the same corrupt, illegal, and immoral policies of Warfare/Aerial Bombings/Foreign Occupations/Goverment Secrecy/Oil Contracts/Mercenary Contractors/Secret Rendition/War Profiteering/Locking-up people without any rights or charges/etc  are still being perpetuated, and there has been no rejection of the whole absurd "pre-emptive" Warfare concept, that did not exist before Cheney & Bush.

      A genuine peace movement was created in 2005, led by Cindy, which had a big impact on the surprising 2006 takeover of Congress by the Democrats. But once in power, the Democrates just supported the same damn GOP foreign policy with just a little softer language and blaming the White House even though they elected not to use their own Constitutional powers to both end the War, and/or investigate the War Crimes.

      If people could see the photographs of all the human carnage produced by these tyrannical American acts of mass-violence on a regular basis, 99% of the public would be outraged.  But our News Media keeps all the ugliness away from the eyes of largely brainwashed public.

      We need more people like Cindy who will protest and speak out for an end to this totally insane and self-destructive foreign policy (which is bankrupting our own Country).

      Far more Americans have been killed by the actions of our own government (since 9/11) than the number killed by any so-called "terrorist".  We are our own worst enemy.

      _________________
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
      people of good conscience to remain silent."
           --Thomas Jefferson

      by FreeSociety on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:47:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Many here don't... (12+ / 0-)

    care much for Cindy Sheehan, but like it or not, she will be remembered as the face of the anti-war movement for Iraq. I for one, am glad she is still out there doing what she can.

    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

    by reflectionsv37 on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:00:51 PM PDT

  •  She's a Paultard (8+ / 1-)

    She doesn't believe in the legality of the income tax.

    Pragmatic progressivism is the future.

    by Pragmaticus on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:03:38 PM PDT

    •  So? (4+ / 0-)

      I have to pay for two blown up stadiums in Indianapolis plus a new one I'll never go to a football game in.  

      Taxes can piss me off too.

      Are you just a 'tard?

      Dana - Ad Astra per Aspera! http://www.angrytoyrobot.blogspot.com The enemy is not man, the enemy is stupidity.

      by angrytoyrobot on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:10:08 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Because you don't like how you taxes (4+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        RoIn, Everest42, beemerr, thethinveil

        are spent you don't think we should have income taxes?

        We shall overcome, someday. Yes we can.

        by Sam Wise Gingy on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:12:29 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I don't really care about income taxes. (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          respondeat superior

          I'd prefer not to have to pay, but if I didn't sales taxes would have to go up 20%.  

          Taxes, except taxes for stupid fracking ball teams that suck like vampires, are necessary.

          By the way, here is my two minute hate.

          Greg Garrison of WIBC EMMIS, you are a MORON!

          Thankyouverymuch.

          Dana - Ad Astra per Aspera! http://www.angrytoyrobot.blogspot.com The enemy is not man, the enemy is stupidity.

          by angrytoyrobot on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:15:53 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  We did not have income taxes for 130 years (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Gordon20024, rsie

          Our Country got along just fine without any taxes on Labor or payroll-based deductions for 130 years.

          So it is certaintly possible for the Country to operate that way.

          The taxes and the Central Bank public-debt-based creation of money both were started in 1913.  The vast majority of our income taxes goes into the pockets of private banking Elites (in the form of interest payments on all the debt), and on War, Warfare, and running 750 military bases in 130 Countries all over the World, and being "an Empire".

          But our Country was not founded on the idea of being a Worldwide Military "Empire", we were just supposed to be a happy democratic-republic protecting Liberty here at home.

          If we got rid of the taxes, maybe all the excessive Militarism would have to stop.

          _________________
          "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
          people of good conscience to remain silent."
               --Thomas Jefferson

          by FreeSociety on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:53:37 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  That and... (5+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            RoIn, Ahianne, Bush Bites, Everest42, 1BQ

            ...any hope of publicly funded health care, our public education system, police, fire fighters, public works such as roads and parks.  Just all those militaristic things like that.

            Taxes are a necessary part of living in a civilized, modern society.

            "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -Gandhi

            by Triscula on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:06:01 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Killjoy. (3+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              Triscula, Everest42, rossl

              snark.

              Bush Bites is a subsidiary of Bush Bites Inc., a registered corporate personhood.

              by Bush Bites on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:10:53 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

            •  Nope (0+ / 0-)

              There are literally Trillions of Federal dollars that could be cut, without your silly ideas of cutting "fire fghters", parks, etc.

              People forget that local property taxes largely pay for neighborhood schools and the education system, fire, police, etc, along with State taxes.

              But there are also many existing ideas on how to do away with the corruption of incomprehensible 400,000 pages of Income Taxes and the IRS agency, and replace it with a much more straighforward model.

              If we were not a Worldwide Empire, so many other developments would be availble to us here at home, including Health Care. We spend 500 million dollars every day on just the Iraq War alone.

              _________________
              "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
              people of good conscience to remain silent."
                   --Thomas Jefferson

              by FreeSociety on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:27:59 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  Make up your mind (1+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                Captain Antelope

                Do you want to talk about the necessity of income taxes or the US' role in the world.  They're two different things.

                Even if we drastically reduced our role in the world we would still spend tax revenue on many, many programs that protect and benefit the public.  Are you advocating eliminating spending on such programs?  

                We seek to foster the development of alternative energy, improved access to higher education, universal health care, and improved transportation programs.  We also need to fund Medicare, Head Start, and our Federal contributions to local school systems. Let's not forget consumer protections for food, medicine, and consumer products.  We need to fund medical research and other scientific study which could improve the lives of our citizens.  Oh, and that whole internet thingy?  It began as a program in the Department of Defense.  I'm pretty sure that's also funded through income tax revenue.

                So what is the benefit of elimination of the income tax again?  I can't remember.

                "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -Gandhi

                by Triscula on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:49:35 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

          •  As would public education, transportation, (4+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            RoIn, Ahianne, Triscula, Bush Bites

            safety and protection, and all the other things our taxes provide. I take it you're against funding health care, too?

            "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

            by 1BQ on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:07:14 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

    •  I find that name (7+ / 0-)

      ("Paultard," that is) condescending, mean, and just kind of annoying.  So she agrees with Ron Paul on some financial issues and probably a few civil liberties issues.  That doesn't make her retarded.

      •  I agree. (5+ / 0-)

        I find some of Ron Paul's stances absurd, but I find many of them very sensible and downright logical and patriotic. In fact, I find myself wishing fervently that he didn't hold those few absurd views, because if he'd only abandon them, I would be a passionate Ron Paul supporter.

        And then, I suppose, I would be a Paultard.

        Disgusting namecalling: It's not just for Republicans. We, too, can be hypocritical on this side of the fence.

        •  Well (11+ / 0-)

          Ron Paul is against:
          Social Security
          Medicare
          Medicade
          Graduated income taxes
          The EPA
          The FDA
          The Civil Rights Ammendment
          National Labor Relations Act
          Student Loans
          Pell Grants
          NASA
          NIH
          NOAA

          and

          Ron Paul wants to put us on the gold standard.

          if being right about the war in Iraq and torture is enough for you to support someone then Ron Paul is your guy, but if you think the New Deal was good for America and that the government has a legitimate role in governing our economy, then Ron Paul is not your friend.

          We shall overcome, someday. Yes we can.

          by Sam Wise Gingy on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:23:46 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  I think only opinion polls (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            respondeat superior

            work in terms of "support" vs. "not support."  I'm not some kind of voting machine, either.  I can say, "I support Ron Paul's stance on civil liberties, even if I don't agree with him on gay marriage."

            •  Civil liberities (2+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              Everest42, Captain Antelope

              without civil rights?

              That means those who own "property," like resturants and ammusment parks have a right to discriminate against any one they do not want to business with, like African Americans and Gays.

              Are you sure you mean what you are saying?

              We shall overcome, someday. Yes we can.

              by Sam Wise Gingy on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:28:52 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  I mean that (2+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                NYCee, respondeat superior

                I agree with Ron Paul on a lot of issues of civil liberties, but not a lot of issues of civil rights.  I mean that I do not need to "support" or "not support" him - I just agree with him on certain issues and I don't agree with him on other issues.  I also like the fact that he can stand up for what he believes, even if I don't always agree with what he believes.

                It's not as simple as just supporting him or not supporting him.

          •  Well... (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            rossl

            Ron Paul consistently fights against corruption in high places and "The Establishment" domination of our lives, more than just about anyone else in Washington.

            Ron Paul is For:

            Peace, Commerce, Diplomacy
            Ending all three illegal Wars and Occupations
            Ending Human Torture and Secret Renditions
            Restoring The Bill Of Rights and Ending the unconstitional "US Patriot Act"
            Ending the unconstitional "Military Commissions Act"
            Civil Disobedience
            Ending the job destroying NAFTA/GATT business deals
            Ending the unconstitional Banking Monopoly that generates Trillions in public debt (automatically)
            Getting government out of our bedrooms completely
            Legalizing Marijuana and Ending the "War on Drugs"
            Stopping the RealID card
            Keeping the Internet free from government or corporate imposed censorship/repression
            Breaking up the whole Military-Industrial Complex
            Ending excessive taxation and the worry of IRS audits

            And, furthermore, Ron Paul has said many times that he would not kick people off of social safety net programs, or prevent people from getting social security checks, he just wants to transition away the younger generation onto something that will be more sustainable in the future.

            So his positions are very progressive when compared to the garden variety, entrenched "centrist" Democrat -- who just wanys keeps the same corrupt broken status-quo going on and on and on, until we are bankrupt, the U.S. Dollar is destroyed, and we are awash in mass poverty.

            _________________
            "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
            people of good conscience to remain silent."
                 --Thomas Jefferson

            by FreeSociety on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:11:19 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Hey (3+ / 1-)

              Recommended by:
              Ahianne, Sam Wise Gingy, Captain Antelope
              Hidden by:
              rossl

              Why are you shilling for that Republican here?  This isn't the place for that.  Pimp that nut job elsewhere.

              "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -Gandhi

              by Triscula on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:52:04 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  I'm shilling for defeating "The Establishment" (0+ / 0-)

                That is the real enemy.

                Democrats like Dennis Kucinich are also doing that.
                But too many of them are cowardly and obsequious in the face of high power, or are corrutly indoctrinated -- including Obama who has given the War Establishment and the Banking Elites everything that they wanted.

                You are the "nut job" for fighting against the people who really are trying to expose the corruption in high places and reform the system. If you even actually read the post that I made, it is clear Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are fighting the same corrupt Institutions and Elite powers that have ruined the Country. That is more important than mere party identification by itself.

                A "centrist" Democrat ain't worth a damn.

                _________________
                "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
                people of good conscience to remain silent."
                     --Thomas Jefferson

                by FreeSociety on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 06:21:29 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

              •  Accurately describing positions /= shilling. (3+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                denise b, rossl, FreeSociety


                "Do your taxpayers a favor, and leave him alone." (My State Assembly Rep, Marc Pocan, to Denver's City Atty before 2008 DNC)

                by ben masel on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 06:54:00 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  Is it accurate? (0+ / 0-)

                  How the hell should I know if it's accurate?  It reads like a campaign press release, which = shilling as far as I'm concerned.  This isn't the place for pimping out Republican politicians.  The fact that he opposed the War in Iraq doesn't change that.

                  "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -Gandhi

                  by Triscula on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 07:11:37 PM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

                  •  Almost accurate. (0+ / 0-)

                    except..."Getting government out of our bedrooms completely"

                    He's for getting the FEDERAL gov't out of bedrooms, but his deference to States would still let State Gov't mess around in this area.

                    And "Ending all three illegal Wars and Occupations"

                    while Paul voted against the Iraq use of force, he did approve the initial occupation of Afghanistan.


                    "Do your taxpayers a favor, and leave him alone." (My State Assembly Rep, Marc Pocan, to Denver's City Atty before 2008 DNC)

                    by ben masel on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 09:28:56 PM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

              •  LOL (0+ / 0-)

                I shouldn't be surprised that someone would HR this comment...but I am.

                Nice job, rossl!

                "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -Gandhi

                by Triscula on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 07:13:23 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

            •  Ron Paul fights corruption (0+ / 0-)




              _________________
              "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
              people of good conscience to remain silent."
                   --Thomas Jefferson

              by FreeSociety on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 06:42:37 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

          •  Hey, it's easy to be against everything. (3+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Ahianne, Triscula, Everest42

            You don't even have to come up with any realistic plans.

            Just say, "end taxes," "eliminate government," "unleash the market" .... spread a little pixie dust and shazam!

            But, it's even better than that, because you can keep spouting this crap all the time and nobody will ever disprove it because nobody will ever be crazy enough to let you anywhere near real power.

            Bush Bites is a subsidiary of Bush Bites Inc., a registered corporate personhood.

            by Bush Bites on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:22:22 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Nope (0+ / 0-)


              The point is to follow the U.S. Constitution, and to also have more control on a local level.

              People can have a real effect and control over their local government.  

              But they are mostly powerless over big, monolithic, Orwellian, Federal, Centralized government and that government, as history has shown, will not listen to the needs of the people.

              Put it this way:

              You can picket City Hall.
              But you can't get near Dick Cheney's secret bunker

              _________________
              "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
              people of good conscience to remain silent."
                   --Thomas Jefferson

              by FreeSociety on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:32:20 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

          •  Ron Paul is anti-choice. (n/t) (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Triscula, Radical def
      •  Agree. (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        zett, rossl

        I think Paul's either a scammer or completely off the deep end, but "'tard" is direspectful to people with learning disabilities.

        Bush Bites is a subsidiary of Bush Bites Inc., a registered corporate personhood.

        by Bush Bites on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:16:16 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  anybody (6+ / 0-)

      who is unable to come up with a better term of derision than something with "tard" in it has lost their argument before it starts. And if you are going to use that term any way, why hide behind the prefix of Paul or any other qualifier and perhaps avoid the wrath of those who freak out  when that term is used for anything. Act like you got a pair, just go full bore and call her a fucking retard.
      That was lame dude.

      Like the grasses showing tender faces to each other, thus should we do, for this was the wish of the Grandfathers of the World. ~ Black Elk

      by FireCrow on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:21:09 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Cindy's party of one (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    RoIn, Triscula, MBNYC, Morgan Sandlin

    Parties of one don't win elections.

    No one gets elected by themself. You get elected when you form an effective party. If you can't get supporters who believe in you and your ideas then how do you expect to get a majority of voters to believe in you?

    We shall overcome, someday. Yes we can.

    by Sam Wise Gingy on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:10:58 PM PDT

    •  That's a huge oversimplification (4+ / 0-)

      of how parties and independent campaigns work in this country.  Probably part of the reason Cindy didn't get more votes is that she had to spend the first few months or so of her campaign collecting tens of thousands of signatures just to get on the ballot.  And she did have the support of two minor parties (the Greens are actually about equal to the Republicans in San Francisco), but that obviously wasn't enough for her to win.

      •  You are confirming my point. (0+ / 0-)

        Running for a national office is a bid deal and there is not enough time to form and organize a party and win and election.

        You win elections when political parties choose you to be their nominee.

        The candidate and the party work together to win an office.

        Independents rarely win anywhere, and very, very few ever win national offices.

        We shall overcome, someday. Yes we can.

        by Sam Wise Gingy on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:42:41 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  That doesn't mean (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          esquimaux

          that independents should never run.  To me, it means that it should be easier for independents to run (believe me, it's very hard for them to run just because of the legal barriers against them right now, set up by incumbents and the major parties).

          In my opinion, she had a very good reason for running as an independent.  And it's not like she was going to get the Republican nomination, or the Democratic nomination, for that matter.  At least not in that race.

      •  Thank Goodness she didn't get elected (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        RoIn, Everest42

        FOX would have their Democratic "Bachmann".

        Reframe the HCR debate: Medicare for all equals a tax break for most.

        by jec on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:48:44 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Well... (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      rossl

      Ross Perot came pretty damn close!

      Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

      by reflectionsv37 on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:34:40 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Heh. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    DemocraticLuntz

    Ms. Sheehan friended me a few months ago on Facebook, and I always look forward to her newest zaniness.

    It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both.

    by MBNYC on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:13:24 PM PDT

  •  DK is as viciously anti-Cindy (8+ / 0-)

    as Michael Savage is viciously...  Well.  Completely nuts.

    Ok, not a good comparison.

    However, Cindy was treated really badly here.  Stupidly bad.  It was shameful.

    Dana - Ad Astra per Aspera! http://www.angrytoyrobot.blogspot.com The enemy is not man, the enemy is stupidity.

    by angrytoyrobot on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:13:29 PM PDT

  •  Sure Cindy... (4+ / 0-)

    Progressives who criticize me aren’t real progressives

    No sweetie...I'm a progressive, and you're a publicity hungry individual who has ended being a liability to the progressive movement.

    Wonders are many, but none so wonderful as man.

    by Morgan Sandlin on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:18:08 PM PDT

    •  While your tone is condescending (5+ / 0-)

      and unnecessarily mean, I think she didn't mean to be as stuck-up-sounding as that comment makes her seem.  If you could have seen her when she said it maybe you would understand - it was just kind of an off the cuff, uncomplicated way of saying that if she is getting disrespected by someone, then oftentimes they're someone who is trying to take advantage of progressives rather than actual progressive (maybe I'm explaining this poorly, but it also helps to take into consideration her experience - she sees herself and the peace movement as being "co-opted" by false progressives in the Democratic Party).

    •  How nice for you (10+ / 0-)

      to be so full of certitude and have such insight into the crafty Ms. Sheehan's motivation.

      As for me, when I look at her and listen to her, I see and hear a painfully shy woman who was dragged into the spotlight by the grotesque murder of her son by a sociopathic Presiden't war of choice and stepped up to the challenge of speaking up for the voiceless and continuing to do so long after it became a drag and unfashionable. And it's not something she's good at, either, but she soldiers on (so to speak), because she feels responsible to do so.

      I happen to agree that she's probably a liability; but I cannot deny her passion for doing what she feels is right, and I certainly don't see a publicity hungry individual when I look at her.

      But then, perhaps I just don't have as keen an eye for it as you do.

      •  Perhaps you don't :) (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        OnlyWords

        I'm not going to go through the history that we've all read ad nauseum regarding Ms. Sheehan's blunders but her comment highlighted above is typical of what she has been espousing for awhile, which boils down to:

        "I'm the only one with true motives and purpose. The Democratic party is corrupt and not truly progressive".

        I may sound short, but I have no patience with Ms. Sheehan.

        Wonders are many, but none so wonderful as man.

        by Morgan Sandlin on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:29:27 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Well... (10+ / 0-)

          I'll refer you to Bill Maher's most recent rant closing his New Rules segment on "Real Time" vis a vis the Democratic Party: The Democratic Party as it stands today is corrupt and it is not truly progressive, so if that's your beef with her, in its essence... I'll side with Ms. Sheehan on that issue.

          I know many here on DKos became disenchanted with Ms. Sheehan over a period of time that climaxed with her announcement that she would challenge Nancy Pelosi; I saw that as a very quixotic act - truly quixotic, in that she didn't stand a chance. But honestly, I couldn't believe the level of vicious outrage turned on her over what was, after all, never going to be more than a protest campaign. And she was telling the truth! She was speaking "truth to power!"

          This site baffles me, really. What is the point of "electing Democrats" if those Democrats simply turn out to be Republicans in disguise? If those Democrats merely carry out the policies that moderate Republicans of a decade ago would have done? Because that is what has been happening. ANd that is what appears to be what will continue to happen until TRUE progressives - yes, I said it - demand of the Democrats that they actually behave like Democrats.

          TRUE Democrats.

      •  She is a liability (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Captain Antelope

        I feel bad for her son's loss, but she has become the Jane Fonda of this war.

    •  Nonsense (0+ / 0-)

      Martin L. King would admire Cindy Sheehan.

      He wouldn't think much of you though.

      _________________
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
      people of good conscience to remain silent."
           --Thomas Jefferson

      by FreeSociety on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:18:24 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Well, if she's really against taxes..... (0+ / 0-)

      ....like the people above are saying, she's really more of a libertarian than a progressive.

      Bush Bites is a subsidiary of Bush Bites Inc., a registered corporate personhood.

      by Bush Bites on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 05:26:07 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Sheehan? She still bringin' the crazy? (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Everest42, Morgan Sandlin, OnlyWords

    I lick our people's deceased leader's rotting asshole anyway. Try to stop me. --DemocraticLuntz Hat Thief

    by DemocraticLuntz on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:32:41 PM PDT

  •  She nails this one... (9+ / 0-)

    Q: Why are you the leader of a separate anti-war movement, rather than working with Obama and the Democrats in power to reach your goals?

    CS: The Democrats and Obama aren’t anti-war.

    I wish I had a smarmy retort for her here, but I don't.

    To any Democratic politicians reading this: Actions speak louder than words. Allow me to reiterate: ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.

    by wyvern on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:41:34 PM PDT

  •  She needs to move on with her life (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    RoIn, Everest42, Morgan Sandlin, 1BQ, OnlyWords

    At first I supported her. But, once she started embracing Hugo Chavez and appeared with him, I had to pull back. When she started getting involved in the I/P conflict I pulled even further back. For me the final straw was attacking Hillary Clinton and then running against Nancy Pelosi.

    I feel bad that her son died. I'll never know what it is like to a lose a son or daughter in a war that many people believe should never have been fought. She has my sympathy, but I honestly don't believe that she is helping the cause that she is trying to promote any more. In all honesty she's more of a hindrance. She has become the Jane Fonda of the Iraq war.

  •  I heard her talk once... (5+ / 0-)

    I went to the progressive rally? here in Marin that included Barbara Lee, Lynn Woolsey, Maxine Waters as well as Cindy some time ago.....prepared to hold Cindy in disdain. But I found I was pleasantly surprised and found her quite cogent that evening.

    "I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong." Richard Feynman

    by leema on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:46:03 PM PDT

  •  And this answer was not only spot on, but (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Gordon20024, rossl

    vital to attain something closer to a democracy.

    Elections have always been compromised because they’re easily manipulated.  We need things like instant runoff voting, paper ballots, public campaign financing, and term limits.

    "I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong." Richard Feynman

    by leema on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:55:41 PM PDT

  •  In 2005 (9+ / 0-)

    In 2005 there were three events that cracked Bush's hold on total power:

    The Terry Schiavo Act in Congress - even conservative folks didn't much like the way the House meddled in a family's life

    Cindy Sheehan's encampment in Crawford, Texas, and her determined insistence to see Bush face-to-face to ask for exactly what noble cause did her son die.  This brought the Iraq War home to people who had been shielded from the flag-draped caskets brought home in  secrecy to Dover AFB.

    The massive FEMA/DoD clusterfuck after Hurricane Katrina.

    By being the opposition party, Democrats benefited without engaging any of these as issues and holding the Bush administration accountable.

    Regardless of what has happened since, she deserves some thanks for standing up at a crucial time.

    50 states, 210 media market, 435 Congressional Districts, 3080 counties, 192,480 precincts

    by TarheelDem on Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 04:56:46 PM PDT

  •  Sorry, I feel for her loss (0+ / 0-)

    but she's a bit flaky.

Permalink | 100 comments