Skip to main content


As noted the other day the British Iraq War Inquiry has resumed after their holiday break.

Below you will find some of the reports from the outlets of these past days testimonies and what's coming up. These are more focused on the British with little mention, unlike before the holidays, of what was going on here in this country and our administration and military leaders.

U.K. in 2007 made peace with Sadr

British troops in the Iraqi port city of Basra brokered a truce with a Shiite militia before pulling back to their military base in 2007, an inquiry heard.

British forces withdrew from Basra to the port city's international airport three months after the cease-fire. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in March 2008, however, ordered a unilateral military offensive into the city to take on remaining militants....>>>>>

British and Iraqis clashed on air strike policy, Chilcot inquiry told

British troops on patrol in Basra in March 2008, the month the Charge of the Knights operation was launched. Photograph: Ali Yussef/AFP/Getty Images

UK forces refused to risk civilian casualties in joint Basra mission, says former coalition commander

British military commanders clashed with their Iraqi counterparts about requests for air strikes that could have caused massive civilian casualties, the Iraq inquiry heard today.

UK forces refused to launch bombing attacks on areas that had not been properly checked during an Iraqi army-led assault on militias in the southern city of Basra.

The Iraqi prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, took British generals by surprise when he started the operation, called Charge of the Knights, earlier than expected in March 2008.

Snip

White-Spunner told the inquiry: "We were asked at times in those very chaotic early days to do some things by the Iraqis which if we had agreed to, I would be sitting in front of a very different tribunal now ...>>>>>

"I would be sitting in front of a very different tribunal now..."

Wonder how many times that thought passed through the minds of our administration then and the military leaders all giving orders to our soldiers?

Britain refused to carry out risky Iraq air strikes, Iraq inquiry is told

Commander tells inquiry that Iraqis’ requests to strike targets were declined amid concerns over civilian casualties

Nouri al-Maliki, the Iraqi Prime Minister, ordered the "Charge of the Knights" to overthrow the al-Mahdi Army, a Shia militia loyal to the radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr.

Snip

General White-Spunner said that the Iraqi military had been annoyed when he refused requests for airstrikes on targets that he believed could lead to large civilian casualties. "We were invited to drop ordnance on areas which we considered not to have been thoroughly enough vetted and which could have caused considerable civilian casualties," he told the inquiry.

"It did give rise to some people saying we weren’t as co-operative as we could have been, but there were very good reasons. There was some Iraqi annoyance in our targeting policy." He said the American military's rules of engagement were "slightly easier", allowing US forces to be more involved in the operation....>>>>>

Truth at Last: How Blair Took His Party to War in Iraq

The new decade begins with some unfinished business from the old. The official British Government Chilcot Inquiry in to the Iraq War resumed in London on Tuesday, with five more weeks of public hearings devoted to Ministers, senior civil servants and military officers. We shall have to wait until after the British General Election in May to hear the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown and others in government whose continued operational command over British foreign policy precludes them from appearing. Others such as former Minister, Jack Straw, and Tony Blair will, however, be questioned by Sir John Chilcot and his team.

Snip

But if not exactly spectator sport, the Inquiry has so far presented a vivid spectacle of assorted Mandarins, diplomats and military officers, who far from presenting a united front have more often been at pains to illuminate the deep disquiet felt about the Iraq war and its aftermath that ran through much ofthe British Establishment. ‘Disquiet’ is an apt description, for few chose to make their reservations public at the time – or resign in protest....>>>>>

"or resign in protest"

Same, almost, happening on this side of the pond, as we were the main force of lies and cheery picked intelligence as to Iraq. but right from the go we did have many who "resigned", from diplomats to lower level government officials as well as many who were outright fired including from our military leadership, all speaking out about the reality to come if the invasion of that innocent country took place!

Families will not see Blair

RELATIVES of South Tyneside victims of the Iraq war will not be in attendance when Tony Blair gives evidence before an inquiry into the conflict.
Seats for the former prime minister's appearance will be allocated by public ballot.

Mr Blair will give a full day of evidence to the Iraq Inquiry at some point between January 25 and February 5....>>>>>

Tony Blair's Iraq Inquiry appearance is snubbed by dead soldier's dad

John Miller is snubbing Tony Blair's appearance at the Iraq Inquiry.

The dad of a Wearside Redcap killed in Iraq believes it would be "pointless" attending an inquiry to see Tony Blair give evidence.
Audience seats for the former Prime Minister's highly-anticipated appearance at the hearing into the Iraq war will be allocated by public ballot, it has been announced.

John Miller, dad of Corporal Simon Miller, says he will not be attending, but added that there is "no way" Mr Blair can justify the war.

Snip

Cpl Simon Miller, 21, was among six Royal Military Policeman, known as Redcaps, who were killed when they were attacked by a 400-strong Iraqi mob in June 2003

"The other factor is that the families can't say anything. If you have seen the inquiry so far you will notice there hasn't been a peep from the gallery.

"I don't know what they will get out of Blair. It depends whether they ask the awkward questions.

"There's no way he can justify the war. It's already been established that there were no weapons.

"He will just try to save his neck. He must be cringing at the prospect."...>>>>>

Iraq War Inquiry

Watch the Inquiry Live when in Session

Written Transcripts by Date

Oral: The Video's by Date

See how the Inquiry is unfolding on the Sky News Timeline

BBC Iraq inquiry - day by day timeline of evidence given

Originally posted to jimstaro on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 07:30 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (18+ / 0-)

    Blood cannot wash away blood. Hate cannot wash away hate. War cannot wash away war. ( an Afghan Proverb )

    by jimstaro on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 07:30:14 AM PST

  •  U.S. against Criminal Terrorism (9+ / 0-)

    A very good short discussion on what terrorism is, a criminal act, and how we've not only gone way overboard by our policies and occupations, doing exactly what they wanted and proving their propaganda thus increasing their ranks, but how it should be approached in combating against. The ghost enemy is no different then other extremely radical groups anywhere, including in the United States, the one difference is they take their ideologies to the extremes which any other group could do at anytime and have from time to time by lone gunmen, bombers and deeper criminal mindsets of their members!

    Repositioning the U.S. against terrorism

    Jan. 7: Evan Kohlman, NBC terrorism analyst, talks with Rachel Maddow about how the U.S. can change gears in the war on terror to avoid fighting on the terrorists' terms and do more to win the hearts and minds in the Muslim world.

    And our very own highly paid terrorist organization working "In Our Names!" but covered under No Laws!!

    Blackwater's murky role in Afghanistan

    Jan. 7: Jeremy Scahill, author of "Blackwater, the Rise of the World's most powerful mercenary army," helps Rachel Maddow sort out the role of Blackwater in Afghanistan and the use of contractors by the CIA.

    Blood cannot wash away blood. Hate cannot wash away hate. War cannot wash away war. ( an Afghan Proverb )

    by jimstaro on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 07:30:50 AM PST

  •  i think the lack of interest (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    corvo, jimstaro

    is due to the queasy and unspoken conviction on DK that the US won the Iraq war. and we mustn't talk about that.

    ganar? ganar? pero lo importante es perder

    •  Yes, we won the war - and don't question that! (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      corvo, jimstaro

      Iraq is still a mess, and it is very unclear that we won anything there.  But let's not look too closely.

      An illusion can never be destroyed directly... SK.

      by Thomas Twinnings on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 07:46:22 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Not Just (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      corvo

      DK!

      Though the last couple of days haven't brought out much about the U.S., focused more on the Brits which one knew much of it would be over all the days of testimonies, unlike the opening days which brought out a number of testimony of interactions with the counterparts here and the administration then.

      Wait till little tony hits the hot seat!!!!!

      But even back before the holidays nothing was being reported here even though there should have been.

      Blood cannot wash away blood. Hate cannot wash away hate. War cannot wash away war. ( an Afghan Proverb )

      by jimstaro on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 07:49:45 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Well our standard for (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      corvo, jimstaro, jimreyn

      winning a war is "Did we have to evacuate the US embassy with helicopters later carelessly tossed over the side of an aircraft carrier? No? Then we win."

    •  US did not win the Iraq war nor lost it (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      jimstaro

      If you were talking about Bushe's goal to capture Saddam and Kill him, then we won. If you are talking about attracting AQ people to a country that used to be AQ proofed then we won again. But, I don't think scarifying the souls of 4300 soldiers and trillions of dollars for the sake of killing one person and converting an entire region into a terrorists’ incubator is considered a victory

      "Cherish your visions and your dreams as they are the children of your soul, the blueprints of your ultimate accomplishments." - Napoleon Hill

      by dibsa on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 07:59:28 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Sad To Think There Will Never Be (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jimstaro

    anything approaching this kind of examination of the decisions and decision-makers in this country.

    How is it the British public and government is so much braver than we?

    "Give me but one firm spot to stand, and I will move the earth." -- Archimedes

    by Limelite on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 08:14:00 AM PST

    •  Heh. Don't be so sure they are (0+ / 0-)

      until the convictions start rolling in.

      Remember, these folks wouldn't even bust Pinochet.  I'm anticipating a lot of hot air and no results.

      •  An Examination in Itself (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        corvo, jimstaro

        is the step too far we're unwilling to undertake, but the British aren't.

        Legal prosecution following on the heal of any prosecutable revelations was beyond th escope of my comment.

        We already know plenty of illegal acts were committed by Bush, et al., and still Obama and his AG do nothing.  No courage there for that, no courage there for even an inquiry.  Obama is much more interested in drawing the veil, as if festering wounds were a better condition than open wounds for America.

        "Give me but one firm spot to stand, and I will move the earth." -- Archimedes

        by Limelite on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 08:34:36 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Don't just lay blame on (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          corvo

          Obama and Holder, look at what went on long before the election with the Fear by Dems to seek Impeachment for Actual Crimes against this Countries National security and the Corruption of the transfer of funds from our treasury by them and the congresses!!

          This is the Countries Unwillingness Not this Administrations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          Blood cannot wash away blood. Hate cannot wash away hate. War cannot wash away war. ( an Afghan Proverb )

          by jimstaro on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 08:45:47 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  I Place Blame Where It Rightfully Lies (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            corvo, jimstaro

            in our present time -- on the person who promised change and led the voters to believe that we would return to a democratic form of lawful government.

            That the Obama Administration is not the tyrannical butcher of the Constitution that made the Bush Administration so eager with their knives is commendable.  And I am glad of that!

            But it is not enough: Not Bush is simply not enough.

            For me, anyway.

            "Give me but one firm spot to stand, and I will move the earth." -- Archimedes

            by Limelite on Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 08:54:05 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

          •  well, both, actually. n/t (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            jimstaro

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site