Skip to main content

Adding Tiger Woods' tearful apology to all the other tearful apologies we've heard of late may be cathartic, but I don't feel it contributes much useful knowledge to the human sum total. Yes, Tiger, it's wrong to cheat on your wife, it's hurtful to all the people who look(ed) up to you and it's good you're getting treatment for whatever addiction you may be battling. It's also wrong, Mr. Spitzer, to patronize members of the world's oldest profession after going after it hammer and tongs while a member of the world's second oldest profession. It's also not nice, Mr. Sanford, to high-tail it to South America for forbidden pleasures while standing up for the American dream. Yes,  Mr. Edwards, your treatment of your cancer-stricken wife was rather despicable, but we loved your haircut when you wanted to be president. It's all true.

It's all completely beside the point,

If a politician screws up, figuratively or literally, the people can (and often do) kick him out. If a sports figure lets down his adoring fans, sponsors can (and do) yank his endorsements. But seldom do we question the mindset that permits and often encourages both the sports "hero" and the political "leader."

Tiger put his finger right on the problem when he said he felt that he could get away with anything. We heard the same kind of thing from Mike McGuire and even Pete Rose. We got echoes of this from Sanford, Spitzer, Bill Bennett and Rush Limbaugh. The papers are full of fallen statues with feet of clay and every time it happens, some of us look at each other and wonder "How could anybody be that dumb?" It's easy.

We've built a society on size. Big is good. Bigger is better. Finally, we build things that are so big, we can't stand to have them fall. Banks get "too big to fail." We have shows like American Idol to set people up on immense pedestals until someone bigger comes along to replace them. We equate human worth with net worth - if you're Donald Trump, someone will always be there to open doors for you, hold your coat and tell you you're fantastic. If someone tells you you're not, there's always enough money to hire someone who'll set the record straight.

Sooner or later, a lot of people can't resist this any more and start to believe they're as good as their publicists tell them. This is the "oooops" moment. In the celebrity culture, it's necessary to carve out a special niche in which you can be THE celebrity. Maybe you want to be the pure, high-minded type or maybe you prefer to be the ruthless, anything-for-a-buck capitalist. This is not easy - it takes hard work, but finally you get there and you have arrived. Every move you make is news. Every product you use, whether you really use it or not, brings in endorsement cash. After tirelessly working to get to the top, you become public property. Your life becomes our business. The last thing we expect you to do is screw up, but some of us secretly hope there'll be a dirty little secret in the next issue of The Enquirer. That's why people buy it.

Then, when you finally do screw up, the tabloids that praised you to the skies turn on you. The media that specializes in turning outrage into bucks strive to outdo each in printing inflammatory headlines. How long will this go on? Until no more money can be made out of it. And it's all because of us, the public.

So hold on, Tiger. Pretty soon, somebody else will mess up big time and you'll be off the hook. People will forget your slippage if you start winning again. America loves a winner - think Roman Polanski.  In your case, there's no argument about your skill, just your judgment. Keep the first and change the second and you'll be back before you know it.

And we can set the altars up again.

Originally posted to boguseconomist on Mon Feb 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    brooklyn137, fedorko

    Old age and treachery overcomes youth and skill.

    by boguseconomist on Mon Feb 22, 2010 at 12:29:36 PM PST

  •  Just found first monogamous amphibian (0+ / 0-)

    There was an article in the Huff Post that scientists have just found the first monogamous ampibian, a tiny frog that pretends to be poisonous and raises it's tadpoles in tiny puddles in leaves.  Of the ten they studied, only one had verifiably cheated on it's mate.  That passes for reliably monogamous in the scientific world.

    Let's face it, politicians are like the rest of us, human and non-human, we cheat.  I know, I know, you never did, you were one of the ten percent of fake poisonous frogs.  But you get my point.  

    The only difference is that the rest of us get to be holier than thou when a politician or athlete gets caught.  Yes, some politicians actually act holier than thou, but if you read Max Blumenthal's book, Republican Gomorrah, it seems that the louder one proclaims his holiness, the less holy he or she actually is.  

    You want to be a fake poison frog?  Go ahead.  I prefer to be human.  :-)

  •  Mike McGuire? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TerribleTom

    I think you meant Mark McGwire.

    Anyway, he's got lots of company - Rafael Palmeiro, Barry Bonds, Jason Giambi, etc.  The years 1995 - 2005 will forever be known as the "steroid era."

    Oh...and I believe Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame.  A Hall of Fame without the Hit King is a sham.

    "Ladies and gentlemen, I'm just a piano player, but tonight God is in the house." --Fats Waller, upon recognizing Art Tatum in the crowd

    by wildcat6 on Mon Feb 22, 2010 at 12:53:25 PM PST

  •  I only came into this diary (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TerribleTom, fedorko

    To ask what the hell Tiger Woods' personal perfidy has to do with anything.

    He's a very successful guy who can't keep his dick in his pants.  So what?

    I don't know what our society's obsession with petty sexual dalliances is good for because all it seems to do is cause one great big festering neon distraction.

    Republicans and personal responsibility are distant, estranged acquaintances.

    by slippytoad on Mon Feb 22, 2010 at 01:14:26 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site