Skip to main content

{Originally posted at my blog Senate Guru.}

Best I can tell, there are five 2010 U.S. Senate races that still don't have a Democratic candidate.

StateRepublican IncumbentFiling Deadline
AlaskaLisa MurkowskiJune 1
GeorgiaJohnny IsaksonApril 30
IdahoMike CrapoMarch 19
OklahomaTom CoburnJune 9
South DakotaJohn ThuneMarch 30

Much more below the fold.

It should be unacceptable to not run a candidate.  For Party building and grassroots organizing, for holding the Republican incumbent accountable, and for the rare occasion when we catch lightning in a bottle, there should not be a race for U.S. Senate that doesn't feature a Democratic option on the ballot.

Of the five, the soonest deadlines are Idaho (March 19 - this Friday!) and South Dakota (March 30 - two weeks from today).  While no race should go unchallenged, these two would be among our most uphill of challenges.  In 2008, of course a very Democratic-friendly year, the Democratic nominee in Idaho, a former Congressman, could only achieve 34% on Election Day.  (Note that Idaho is, technically, not without a Democratic candidate.  Attorney William Bryk has said that he will seek the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in Idaho.  The one hang-up: he lives in Brooklyn, New York.  He simply believes that no race should go unchallenged and doesn't think that the Idaho Democratic Party will field a candidate.  Though Idaho law states that a candidate need only be a resident of the state by the day of the general election, obviously no out-of-state candidate will be taken seriously.)  Further, John Thune enjoys significant popularity in South Dakota, without any recent murmurs of Democratic challengers.  While seemingly unlikely at this point, I hope Democratic candidates of some substance emerge in these two states.

The next two deadlines on the list - Georgia (April 30) and Alaska (June 1) - would be the most unforgivable of the five if Democrats were unable to find credible challengers.  Georgia is a state where Democrats can surprise Republican incumbents.  Recall the 2008 election in which Democrat Jim Martin entered the race relatively late, won a crowded primary, and forced incumbent Republican Saxby Chambliss to a run-off by holding him under 50% on Election Day.  On top of that, the 2010 Republican incumbent, freshman backbencher Johnny Isakson, has poor approval numbers.  Public Policy Polling recently put Isakson's numbers at 36% approve, 38% disapprove.  Less than a year ago, a hypothetical match-up by Research 2000 between Isakson and Democratic former Governor Roy Barnes showed a statistical dead heat.  Isakson can be beaten.  Georgia has Democrats strong enough to take on and defeat Isakson.  Currently, the Democratic primary for Governor is crowded, though former Governor Barnes has comfortably led the pack.  Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker has been running second to Barnes in the primary pack.  Also in the Democratic scrum is David Poythress.  Poythress hasn't been able to get traction with primary voters to climb out of single digits in any poll, but he brings with him an outstanding resume of service to Georgia: an Air Force veteran, a former Georgia Secretary of State, a former State Labor Commissioner, and a former Adjutant General leading Georgia's National Guard, having been elected statewide multiple times and appointed to office by Governors of both Parties.  If either Baker or Poythress switched gears from a gubernatorial bid to a Senate bid, either could sew up the nomination and offer Isakson an extremely tough race.  Baker is running strongly enough in some primary polls that it would be unlikely that he'd switch gears; but, Poythress - again, unable to climb out of single digits in the Democratic primary against Barnes and Baker - might be more amenable to a switch from a likely-fruitless gubernatorial bid to a high profile, winnable Senate campaign.

In Alaska, incumbent Republican Lisa Murkowski apparently enjoys higher approval among her constituents than Isakson does among his.  Nevertheless, Murkowski is beatable.  In recent years, the Alaska Republican Party has become synonymous with corruption.  The blowback from this Alaska GOP Culture of Corruption culminated with the 2008 dethroning of Ted Stevens.  And Murkowski herself has been touched by considerable controversy of her own.  You may recall that she started off on the wrong foot when she won her job courtesy of nepotism.  Her dad, Frank, appointed her to his old seat when he became Governor.  (Thanks in part to this nepotism, Frank was himself kicked out of office courtesy of a primary loss to small town Mayor Sarah Palin.)  Since then, Murkowski dipped her toe into the Alaska GOP Corruption pool when she took part in a sweetheart land deal, purchasing prime property at well below market value from, of all people, one of Ted Stevens' corporate cronies - only selling back the land at the discount price for which she received it once the media caught wind of the shenanigans.  Murkowski's shady dealings earned her a spot in the 2007 edition (in PDF) of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington's annual "most corrupt members of Congress" list.  Alaska Dems have about two and a half months to secure a credible challenger.  Please share your thoughts on a potential strong recruit in the comments.

Finally, Oklahoma (June 9), like Idaho earlier on this list, had a 2008 Democratic Senate nominee who enjoyed substantial charisma and a solid message, but was unable to crack 40%.  No doubt, Oklahoma would be a similarly uphill race for any Democrat.  Even popular Democratic Governor Brad Henry trailed Republican incumbent Tom Coburn by double digits in a 2009 hypothetical match-up by Public Policy Polling.  Still, as always, not finding any Democratic candidate of substance to run is political malpractice.

Of the five U.S. Senate races still seeking a credible Democratic candidate, two are not only potentially competitive but truly winnable with the right candidate.  Your thoughts?  Do you have a preferred candidate in Georgia or Alaska (or the other three states)?  Do you have a preferred course of action - a movement to urge/persuade/beg David Poythress to switch races or a draft effort in Alaska?  Share in the comments!

Originally posted to Senate Guru on Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 09:49 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'd like Poythress switch to the Senate race (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GN1927, Magnifico, gulfgal98, Sunspots

    Since Barnes has locked up the Dem nomination for Governor.  I think with his military experience, he could make it a competitive race.

  •  Polar bear (3+ / 0-)

    I wish a polar bear would run against Lisa Murkowski and win. Alaska is being negatively impacted by climate change and Murkowski is a big denialist.

  •  These are not worth spending a dime in (0+ / 0-)

    The only race where the democrat won't lose by 20 points might be Georgia and it still won't be competitive. I think someone should get on the ballot but I wouldn't waste any money on them.

  •  Thanks for the update... (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Magnifico, BrowniesAreGood, Sunspots, Loge

    It's a nice change from the health care discussion.  :)

    Grassroots building is all we can expect from these races.  But it needs to be done and we shouldn't deprive citizens from certain states of the opportunity to hear the Democratic point of view from something other than the TV.

    The most dangerous... programs, from a movement conservative's point of view, are the ones that work the best and thereby legitimize the welfare state. Krugman

    by BasharH on Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 10:01:33 AM PDT

  •  I'd love to see Poythress take on (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Sen Isakson. He'd be a very strong candidate. His video after some Republicans started taklking about seccession is a must see:

    Gen David Poythress

    "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan

    by atlliberal on Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 10:02:31 AM PDT

  •  I don't (0+ / 0-)

    I don't understand why a state senator who isn't up for re-election doesn't want to file in those states.  Yes, you will lose, but what if there is a late-breaking scandal or a 'Macaca moment'.  If you are there, you may just get lucky.  And you get your name out there if you want to move up the ladder another time - you don't have to win, you just have to beat expectations.  If you do okay in a strong GOP year and show some hustle, then people will remember you when there is another statewide opening or a seat in the House.

    •  grassroots building (0+ / 0-)

      is enough of a struggle and will have greater payoff in some of these states.  South Dakota for example is so overwhelmingly Republican, that there is no base to draw Democratic candidates from - instead of offering a sacrificial lamb to compete with Thune's $6 million campaign fund, the Democratic party should spend the money grooming candidates for school boards, city and town councils and the state legislature. It doesn't help now, but it's the only hope for the future.  

      But be careful who you train:

      Republican U.S. House candidate Rep. Kristi Noem said she was seeking leadership skills, not flirting with Democratic politics, when she attended a campaign training camp sponsored by former Sen. Tom Daschle 10 years ago.

      Never separate the life you live from the words you speak - Paul Wellstone

      by meralda on Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 11:54:05 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  If Too Many Democrats Are Elected Harry Reid (0+ / 0-)

    would be without his talking point.

    We don't have the votes.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site