Skip to main content

National Review Online has named Red Dawn—a 1984 Patrick Swayze flick for those of you that don't know—the #15 "best conservative movie." I believe it plays a defining role in the teabagger subconscious and their meta-language.

In a nutshell, the plot of the movie the United States is invaded by the Soviets and a band of teenagers from white Happy Days utopia—get this—become terrorists (the "Wolverines" after their high school mascot) and harass the Soviet occupation forces, earning them the admiration of a Cuban commander who remembers the good ole' days of being a guerilla instead of part of a huge army. Everyone except Jennifer Grey and one other person die and escape to=—the free United States which is in—again, get this—California.

In the end a war monument is erected and the Americans win.

Much more than the actual American Revolution, I believe the teabaggers see themselves as acting out the plot of this film. I invite you to do a Google search for "Red Dawn Obama" to see the variety of examples.

There is no theory of a Soviet occupation in the movie. The aww shucks cowboy answer given by Powers Boothe's air force pilot character is that the "two biggest kids on the block" eventually have to fight. In the beginning we are treated to an explanation that NATO fell apart. There is also no explanation of what the strategic goal of such an occupation is or how it could possibly occur without a massive nuclear exchange. (A limited one is hinted at, which I don't ever recall reading about in anything other than a European frontal war between NATO and the Soviets).

The movie is right-wing porn on many levels. First of all, the beginning is an idyllic small town full of white people with common sense 'Murican values and Mr. Swayze is the captain of the football team. The Soviets land from parachutes (on commercial flights which apparently we are fools to let overfly us or something) and start shooting up the school (I know—wtf?). Then they round up everyone with a registered gun into a prison camp in the middle of town. So, just remember in the event of a Soviet occupation, gun registrations are a problem.

The cast of teenagers escapes into the woods where good country folk give them camping supplies and guns and shit and then they decide to start killing the Russians.

All of the right wing values that are bound up in this otherwise mediocre flick offer a method of funneling the powerlessness in political expression combined with entitlement for those who "want their country back." Libruls are proxies (obviously) both for those who setup the good folks of the US for this occupation through military laxity and gun owner registration requirements and the Communist occupiers themselves.

The American resistance is justified in murder in one scene where a Soviet is begging for his life only to be shot, because, Swayze's character explains "we live here." In other words, they are justified because it's their country and they want it back.

The entitlement to the land by the teabaggers is couched in their purporting to uphold the Constitution through various trivial clauses like the natural birth clause and so forth even though they never seemed to mind the Constitutional illegitimacy of Bush's first election or a very long list of his other actions, but, more critically, feeling justified in entertaining extra-Constitutional measures—burning the village to save it—up to and including coup d'etat.. Cloaking themselves in the guise of Constitutionalism and patriotism is where the "tea party" name comes from, but these folks are not trying to uphold any Founding values and eloquent speeches and liberation politics are not included.

No, they want to fight a guerilla war—as terrorists—against "Communists" who are "occupying" "their" country.

Except, here's the thing. It all has the actual reality of a movie, measured in results.

Sometimes violent movies, video games, and music are blamed for hate crimes. I think their being totally blamed for it is ridiculous, but for some people it's enough to send them over the top. But most people do not go out and sacrifice virgins after listening to a Slayer album. Just a few nuts are shaken lose. We have seen that. We have seen shootings at Unitarian Churches and of Democratic Party leaders.

But what we've seen a lot more of is fantasy. Things like Tweets soliciting assassinations, spitting, and hate speech.  But we haven't seen much action. It's almost exactly parallel to the Iraq war, where the Keyboard Kommandos rabidly attacked everyone who tried to stop other people from going to fight a war. People like Air Guard George and Deferment Rush calling out people like John Kerry even for being critical of the war.

Please, do not take this as a "dare." I want this people to chill the fuck out and go away, but I think the actual lack of action betrays the sort of cinematic fantasy metaphor that they are using, even though they think they are being totally literal. Here's why.

Let's imagine that Red Dawn was real. Or something like it. Some occupying force comes into the United States. Is there even any doubt in your mind that there would be extensive bands of actual partisans? If a Communist power really were occupying this county is there any doubt in your mind that there would be constant conflict? Of course there would.

Just like the hyperbolic Hitler/Stalin etc. language, it can only conjure up images put forth in cinematic fantasy, not actual reality.

In short, much teabagger talk is derived from the fantasy of movies, novels, and other conspiracy theories and these people don't even realize themselves that this is what they are saying. Just as David Frum (no link for him) pointed out in his "Waterloo" piece, the GOP is being led by it's "entertainment" faction. Limbaugh, Beck, Palin et al. are entertainment just like a movie, except their followers take them seriously.

This is the byproduct of living in a society where people's actual experience of most things in the world is almost infinitesimal compared with their entertainment-based "knowledge" of things. It's scary; it's dangerous; and I can only pray that these folks remain pussies in actual life.

Originally posted to Attorney at Arms on Tue Mar 23, 2010 at 08:30 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site