Not just Terrorism? What does it take to be called a terrorist in this country? How many have to be killed? Or how many members does a group have to have to be called a terrorist group? It seems to me that theres some very interesting word play thats been going on when it comes how these groups are addressed. One minute we're seeing guys on monkey bars,the next there are guys running in the woods. They have the same agenda and wish to draw attention to themselves in the same fashion. They both walk like a duck, talk like a duck, and act like a duck, but only one is actually being called a duck. Excuse the duck analogy.
Scott Roeder (Murder of Dr.George Tiller) and the Michigan terrorist organization Hutaree are for some reason never called terrorist?Why? Why was this militia group refered to as a "patriot group". Just because someone with a gun says they're "working for god" or "protecting the country" doesn't mean they are which we all know. But i'm very nervous when more and more people kill people just because they believe they work for god or need to get "their" country back.Scary stuff.
I feel like the media covers up these people by calling them militia groups but every other group found in America that arms themselves,trains a small group of followers,has rhetoric involving what they will do to reject what they feel is imperialistic governement,along with the occasional prayer are refered to as terrorist sleeper cells. Not in Michigan though.They're "patriot groups" or militia or a "anti-abortion extreamist". Scott Roeder (Murderer of George Tiller) was a member
of the Montana Freeman.A anti-government/anti-abortion group. Why are they just extreamists in the media and not terrorists like Richard Reed (the shoe bomber) and thrown immediately into a Supermax in Colorado?
(((((Carpe Diem,quam minimum credula postero))))