Skip to main content

The Grand Canyon is facing an unprecedented convergence of threats, from air pollution to timing of water releases, but the most pressing is uranium mining.  The Obama administration's desire for more nuclear power has revived interest in extracting uranium.  Since 2003, 2,251 mining claims have been staked within 10 miles of the Grand Canyon National Park boundaries.  The current uranium claims are clustered in watersheds and on the aquifers that feed the tributaries, springs and seeps in the park.

In July 2009, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar announced a two year time-out on new uranium claims on nearly 1 million acres of federal land near the Grand Canyon.  Only Congress can permanently withdraw land from mining claims.

Welcome to this week's edition of Obama Administration caution and Republican obstructionism.

 title=After a 20 year hiatus, one mine owned by Denison Mines resumed operations in January 2010 at the Arizona 1 Mine on the Arizona Strip in Mohave County, about 45 miles southwest of Fredonia and 10 miles from the boundary of Grand Canyon National Park. An estimated eight truckloads/day of ore is being sent to a uranium mill in Blanding, Utah, about 315 miles away. The refined yellowcake produced from this mine can be sold to utilities internationally, and some will likely end up with in South Korea with a utility that owns about 20 percent of Denison Mines.  Gov. Jan Brewer supports both uranium mining and a statewide expansion of nuclear power.

During the two year moratorium, studies will be conducted regarding safety.  Already, the first post-time-out study (Feb. 2010) claims that water near wells is safe, although local environmentalists disagree. The Havasupai tribe fears heavy winds from mining operations and contaminated water supplies.

Is this moratorium-then-study part of a larger pattern of Obama's Department of the Interior?  With offshore oil drilling and coal mining, as with uranium mining, Obama has first announced moratoria, then conducted studies claiming to support extraction, then moves to return to extractive business as usual with a few tweaks.

 title=Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) has proposed H.R. 644 to make the moratorium permanent.  The bill is moving through the House, with a hearing a couple of weeks ago.  However, there's no Senate equivalent bill.  Neither Sen. John McCain (R-crAZy) nor Sen. John Kyl (R-crAZier) is willing to put the Grand Canyon and the health of the Colorado River watershed above nearby uranium mining.  They're not willing to reach across the aisle on a matter that should concern all Arizonans.

While normally I'd recommend support of HR 644, in this case waiting might be smart.  A similar bill was introduced in the 2007-08 Congress (where the Bush administration flatly opposed it), and likewise a similar bill will be introduced next year.  This Congress, following the human impulse to procrastinate, will put off making a decision until the moratorium expires in 2011.  And by 2010, the state that gave us noted conservationists Morris and Stewart Udall may return to sanity and elect a reasonable Senator.

Originally posted to RLMiller on Tue Apr 20, 2010 at 05:03 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site