Skip to main content

Three simple words too seldom heard.

There was an email in my inbox this morning:

Markos has finally noticed the climate bill and is now tweeting away on it.

Markos tweeted "Did the GOP write the energy bill Obama is now pushing?"

This contradicts to a degree the rant I posted last week-

Kos doesn't give a shit about climate change

wherein I made a case based upon past remarks that Kos made.

My diary used several metrics to support my claim, even though I was hoping against hope that my thesis was wrong. I wanted to believe he cared, but the facts at the time didn't bear that out.

A handful of people showed up in the comments to tell me I was wrong, but they didn't refute the facts; instead they skipped over the substance and criticized the approach I used. They are still incorrect for calling "bullshit" and shooting the messenger, and I was pleased that people's comment recommends seemed to bear that out.

sorry LP but this diary is bullshit. (2+ / 0-)
::  
:: This comment is bullshit (10+ / 0-)

However, in light of recent emails, it appears that my headline, at least, may indeed be untrue and overly inflammatory, and I wanted to admit that.

Here is my retraction:

Kos does n't give a sh!t about climate change


I was wrong.

I'm sorry, kos.

See?
It's not that hard.

+++

I post this diary for two reasons.

  1. To amend my stance in light of new evidence (Not, I repeat NOT, because people bullied, ridiculed, and attacked me for my argument.)

None of the many different aspects of the arguments in that diary have changed. But due to kos' recent tweets the title may now be considered untrue, and I think I owe kos the apology anyway.

  1. Instead of stubbornly refusing to admit my past mistakes, I am trying to instead show a shred of humility and make amends.

Too often in the blogosphere life, people stubbornly cling to their beliefs despite any amount of evidence to the contrary. I have found this issue, superlative intransigence, if you will, to be a growing issue in our world today. This is perhaps best exemplified by the teabaggers who protest "higher taxes" despite the facts clearly showing over 95% of them have lower taxes today than they did just a few years ago.

Is their superlative intransigence any different from our own?

Of course not.

For fun, I did a little search. (Something I do a lot of these days)

http://www.dailykos.com/...
Search:
"I was wrong", 4 weeks:
Found 145 results

Does your name show up?

Kudos to those that are big enough to utter those words.

However, it still seems it is hard for the majority to admit, no matter how much evidence is (or donuts are) presented to convince people they are off base.

Perhaps this community will be a more effective and unified voice if those of us who have offended others were more inclined to utter those three words. Or the even tougher two-and-a-half-word addendum.

I'm sorry.

++
++


UPDATE by LaughingPlanet on Sat Apr 24, 2010 at 2:10:45 PM PDT

Please allow me to use this space to plug a much better and more important diary from earlier today that had a too-short stay on the rec list:

A Dirty Dozen FAQs on the Good, Bad, and Ugly Climate Bill
by RLMiller

discusses my pet issue the subject of my previous diary, for those, like kos, who care about climate change.

I hope we get more good discussion about the eminent climate bill. It is the defining issue of our generation by which our descendants will judge us.

Originally posted to The Laughing Planet on Sat Apr 24, 2010 at 01:17 PM PDT.

Poll

As a human being

39%56 votes
19%28 votes
17%25 votes
0%1 votes
6%9 votes
16%23 votes

| 142 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site