Skip to main content

When this bill passed last week, I came upon a comment at the Arizona Daily Star that provided a great deal of insight into the background of this bill. I then asked the author of the comment, Clay Gibson aka cgibson to post a diary here on the topic.

This weekend, Clay registered to post this diary but was confronted with the new user one week probation period, and so he asked me to post this for him to keep it timely.

Below the fold is his diary in its entirety.

The views being expressed here are mostly based on fact, but I do not pretend to support House Bill 2281 in any sort of positive light.

After House Bill 2281 was passed on the House floor, before being transmitted to Governor Jan Brewer, I decided to investigate the struggle that the Department of Ethnic Studies in Tucson, AZ, had been facing for the past several years. In March of 2010, I conducted interviews with members of the Social Justice Education Project and Maria Federico-Brummer, a Mexican-American Studies Teacher at Tucson High. Many of my friends and mentors are students, volunteers, alumni, and teachers of the Mexican-American / Raza Studies program at Tucson High, where House Bill 2281 has targeted its attacks. I was born and raised in Tucson, Arizona and was a student at Tucson High between 2004-2007. I am a 20 year old student, currently pursuing my BFA in Art at the California Institute of the Arts in Valencia, California.

A Brief History: Tucson, Arizona

In 1969, students from Tucson High Magnet School, in solidarity with community members, began to demand a more equitable education for the youth of Tucson, Arizona. The group, calling themselves "Cormas," assembled walkouts at Tucson High, boycotting what they felt was an unjust education.¹ In 1974 Hispanic students and parents rallied together to file a lawsuit for the desegregation of public schools. "Roy and Josie Fisher, a black couple with students in the district, filed a similar lawsuit that year. Their suit, and that filed by Hispanic parents, eventually were put into one; and in 1978, U.S. District Judge William Frey issued the desegregation order." The movement for an ethnic studies department arose out of the desegregation order which "made specific faculty assignments in the 1970s and implemented three phases of student assignments to schools in the early1980s." Funding for desegregation initiatives in the Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) came from federal programs, until 1984-1985, when the funding was transfered to state taxes. ²

The demand for TUSD to establish and fund a centralized ethnic studies department continued into the 1980's and 1990's with the sustained activism of community members and current students. Finally in 1997, the Department of Ethnic Studies was established; and in July of 2004 the department accounted for Native American, African-American, Pan Asian, And Mexican-American / Raza Studies programs. As of 2004, the Department of Ethnic Studies, in association with the University of Arizona, was able to provide a comprehensive curriculum for three high schools and three middle schools. Chicano Literature, Social Justice, and American History : Mexican-American Perspective were among the many classes offered through Mexican-American / Raza Studies at Tucson High.

The drive to develop an ethnic studies department came out of the need to maintain a curriculum that was more reflective of the student population that was enrolled in its classes. It called for a curriculum that included the history of the community; taught by teachers who were of the students' own cultural background and whom possessed bilingual capabilities. Maria Federico-Brummer, a Mexican- American / Raza Studies teacher at Tucson High, explains that the material that is being taught is, "the history of youth fighting, not only for their right to an education, but also that [that education] is an equitable one and represents their cultural heritage. So what these classes hold on to, as a tradition, is the history of people sacrificing their lives for the right for these spaces to exist, which inspires the
[current] students to do the same." ³

In 2007 Dolores Huerta, an activist leader and close friend of Cesar Chavez, was asked through the Department of Ethnic Studies to give a speech at Tucson High. In her speech, Huerta made the statement that, "Republicans hate Latinos," which gained national media attention almost immediately. Most importantly, it caught the eye of Arizona's Republican Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tom Horne. Shortly after, Horne published "An Open Letter to the Citizens of Tucson," which opens with, "The TUSD Ethnic Studies Program Should Be Terminated." ⁴ Horne describes in the section entitled "Personal Observations," how Latina Republican Deputy, Margaret Garcia Dugan, appeared at Tucson High in order to refute Huerta's sweeping judgement. Horne mentions that a group of Raza Studies students rudely walked out during Dugan's speech when asked politely to remain seated. Horne goes on to say:

In hundreds of visits to schools, I've never seen students act rudely and in  defiance of authority, except in this one unhappy case. I believe the students did not learn this rudeness at home, but from their Raza teachers. ⁴


In 2008 Senate Bill 1108 was proposed as a Homeland Security Bill that was composed of such vague propositions as to, "Develop, implement and maintain regional homeland security strategies." ⁷ The bill claimed to secure borders, but if passed it would deplete funding from all Arizona schools that implemented ethnic studies programs; including universities, community colleges, charter schools, etc. However, the bill was so broad that if passed it would not only cancel ethnic studies but a wide range of other academia and necessary school funding.⁷ At Tucson High, students and teachers assembled walkouts, reminiscent of those in 1969,  and marched to city hall to protest. Luckily, the bill never left the Senate floor.

In June of 2009, Senate Bill 1069's purpose was to prohibit, "Arizona schools from instruction in ethnic studies aimed at a particular group or that advocate ethnic solidarity." ⁸ In response, community members and local groups including Capolitio Chicali, an indigeonous organization in the community, and a group called the Social Justice Education Project (SJEP) consisting of alumni and current students of the three high schools within the Department of Ethnic Studies and the University of Arizona; formed a protest. In the middle of the scorching June heat, the groups assembled and ran over one hundred miles, beginning at the TUSD Headquarters in Tucson and ending at the Arizona State Capitol building in Phoenix. As with SB 1108, this bill never left the Senate floor, but the powers that be were not satisfied.

On April 30th, 2010 House Bill 2281, written by Horne, was transmitted on to Arizona's Governor Jan Brewer to give the final vote on the bill after it passed the House with thirty-two votes "yes" and twenty-six votes "no." The bill prohibits any curriculum that, "Are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group, and advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals." ⁵ However, Sean Arce, director of Mexican-American studies for TUSD affirms that the department does not exercise anything that the bill forbids. "While ethnic studies supporters said that the bill is too vague to apply to their program, Horne said that if it becomes law, and TUSD contests it, he will have a third party verify that it applies to the district's program." ⁶

HB 2281 states:

15-111.  Declaration of policy

15-112.  Prohibited courses and classes; enforcement


On May 12th, 2010 Brewer signed off on HB 2281.

Maria Federico-Brummer reflects on the harm this bill has caused to the
Ethnic Studies department,

On an emotional level, this is something that has been considered sacred to this community. Our elders that struggled for this space to  exist  are  filled  with  an  anger  and  a  sadness  because  we continue to have individuals who don't understand what this space is  about  and  don't  understand  that   our  educational  system attempts  to  create  a  more  accessible  and   more   equitable
experience for our students. ³

HB 2281 declares that any school not in compliance with its ordinances will be given a 90 day warning by the ADE, the Auditor General, or the Attorney General. Following that 90 day period, if the school refuses to comply with the law, the state will withhold ten percent of funding from the school; therefore, forcing the school to close its doors to all classes in violation. According to Arizona Education Association and as of 2008, Arizona already ranked, "49th out of the 50 states in the amount spent per student." * The Tucson Unified School District is also facing the possibility of issuing approximately 102 pink slips to teachers if Proposition 100 is not passed on Tuesday, May 18th. ** Prop. 100 proposes create a 1% temporary tax increase, where two-thirds of revenues collected will be put towards K-12 public education. To make matters worse, the Arizona Department of Education has also informed schools that educators with accents will no longer be permitted to teach English classes.

Tom Horne:

Horne accuses the ethnic studies classes of marketing African-American studies for African-American students, Mexican-American studies for Mexican- American students and so on. Supporters of HB 2281 have easily accepted Horne's argument as fact; however the truth is that the ethnic studies classes are open to the whole school. The fact is that the majority of the student population in TUSD schools are Latino, so it would seem accurate that the majority of students in any class would be Latino. TUSD's Ethnic Studies programs are offered in cooperation with the district's Social Studies and English Writing requirements, and are provided along with traditional American History and English classes. The classes are chosen by the students and not presented as pre-requistites for the identifying racial group. The Ethnic Studies classes are open to all students, regardless of their ethnicity.

Horne builds his attack on the department for promoting "ethnic chauvinism," to, what he thinks, are classes of one singular race. "It is fundamentally wrong to divide students up according to their racial group, and teach them separately." ⁴ Horne's argument on racial segregation, however comprehensible, proves to be misguided and obsolete in congruence to the Ethnic Studies classes he targets. The segregation that Horne refers to may more appropriately be attributed to the 1890's case of Plessy vs. Ferguson under the educational law of "separate but equal." Therefore, by passing HB 2281, Horne has created the exact segregation that he attempted to abolish. Written all over this law is the disregard for how this bill would promote the same kind of discrimination it attempts to be rid of. It represents the lack of responsibility for the actions of those backing HB 2281.

What this law has done, among many other things, is to bring more clearly in to the public consciousness the idea of power and privilege. However, there have been many other instances of this throughout history that we could speak of, Horne and Brewer's decisions and ideas on these matters reflect a disregard for their position among a social hierarchy that puts them at an advantage.

Privilege is unearned entitlement and advantage, giving power to specific groups. This system of hierarchy works to benefit one group of people at the expense of another. The visible and invisible mechanisms of power and privilege ultimately sculpt today's society and influence a person's role and social status. Whether it is seen as an advantage or not, it is necessary to understand these power relationships affect each and every one of us in a negative way. And whether HB 2281 was passed or not, these matters would still affect us, but with the circumstances of HB 2281 it brings into light how effortless it was for this bill to be passed; and the effects that it will have on the community.

The history of America is the history of social hierarchies that disenfranchised countless minority groups in order for a small percentage to continue to benefit from their struggle. Dismembering the knowledge of those framings of America's society segregate minority groups from an accurate cultural heritage and perspective. The Ethnic Studies programs encourage multiple perspectives and the equality of voices being heard. Horne's philosophy, as he states in, "An Open Letter to the Citizens of Tucson," is that "people are individuals," and should be taught as such.⁴ The ethnic studies programs provide multiple perspectives so that the students may gather a well-rounded perspective and come to their own individual conclusions. Horne's philosophy seems to epitomize the Ethnic Studies programs, while his uneducated arguments backfire and exemplify what will occur if he does in fact, terminate the department.

Horne writes,

Most of these students' parents and grandparents came to this country  legally, because this is the land of opportunity... Those students should be taught that this is the land of opportunity, and that if they work hard they can achieve their goals. They should not be taught that they are oppressed. ⁴

It is not Horne's disregard for oppressive hierarchies that is the problem, but rather, it is his neglect for his own privilege and access to a history that may not be available to other groups. Horne speaks from a perspective where "working hard," brings success; however he does not account for his own unearned advantages from the racial group in which he socially belongs. Horne speaks of teaching oppression as if the teachers were to say, "You are not good enough." Fortunately, this is not the case. The teaching of social hierarchies in a classroom setting is not only relevant to an individual's identity development; but it is also extremely important in order to understand how to approach society and challenge unbalanced and unjust norms.

"...The problem is recognizing that the 'reality' of the oppressed, which  has  been  concealed  and  forced  into  conformity  by  the
'reality of the dominant,' has such an unimaginably different face. It is difficult  for  people living the dominant reality to acknowledge that there is another  reality not visible to them... Speaking of an official  history  means  constructing  a national  past  based  on  a single orthodoxy, suppressing the diversity and conflict that exists among people."
-Chizuko Ueno

Adrian Lorenzi, a Caucasian alumni from the Tucson High Ethnic Studies program talks about how Chicano Literature impacted his identity and academic performance:

As far as my education goes, the Raza Studies classes I took had the most impact on my life of any class I've taken in college or high school to date. The most significant effect was probably in the way I perceive and think about race in both a societal and an individual context.

The importance of having classes like American History from the Mexican- American Perspective, for example, is that those voices were erased from the public records and previous mainstream history books; and any picture that doesn't take those voices into consideration is left incomplete.
The idea is this. A large group of people are stranded on an island; each one of them different from the next, with different backgrounds, stories, experiences, etc. They have gathered in the center of the island and plan to assemble a map of the island so that they may choose the most effective exit. They decide to each walk to opposite ends of the island and at the end of the day meet back at the center to recount each linear path so that they may get a better sense of the whole. They tell of significant obstacles they encountered along their paths and of their destinations; each person's account as imperative as the next. With the knowledge gathered from the multiple perspectives, the group is able to better understand the whole and to begin their departure. We cannot exist in multiple locations or observe through multiple perspectives at once, so we rely on living vicariously through another's expression of their experience. This is the power of multiple voices and perspectives.

The situation between the Mexican-American / Raza Studies program and Horne's HB 2281 represents the clash of hybrid cultural heritages with the larger American historical context. It brings up the question of who's voice represents the ever-diversifying nation that is America and how can we accurately portray its history? Horne attempts to understand equality and justice by arguing for equally diverse class populations, however by doing so Horne attempts to eliminate the voices of more than half of those diverse proportions. Horne's bill and philosophies are the result of a lack of understanding of larger systems of oppression that work to keep him in the position of power and removed from a place of solidarity and understanding. Therefore, his meager attempts at apprehension of multicultural representation in public education do not add up.

The Social Justice Education Project backs a program called the Youth Participation Action Research (YPAR) which encourages youth in low-income neighborhoods to speak from their experiences and to participate in positive changes happening in their neighborhoods. The youth are essential so that the changes being made reflect what they see and not what outsiders view as positive change. As an outsider, Horne views his actions as positive change in a community which he overlooks but is in no way a part of. It is up to the community, the youth, and those inside of the neighborhood of Ethnic Studies to speak out and produce the positive changes that they see necessary in order to rescue education.

Education is the property of no one, it belongs to the people as a whole. And if education is not given to the people, they will have to take it. - Che Guevara


In Arizona, Just Say no to Latino Heritage

The White Anxiety Crisis

Tom Horne on 360° with Anderson Cooper


¹ corma:  figurative (embarazo) hindrance, obstacle

² Bustamante, Mary. "TUSD Desegregation: Mission Accomplished? Sides Hope to
Influence Judge." Tucson Citizen. 21 June 2005.

³ Federico-Brummer, Maria. Interview. 25 March, 2010.

⁴ Horne, Tom. "An Open Letter To the Citizens of Tucson." Letter. 11 June 2007. MS. State of Arizona, Department of Education, Phoenix, Arizona.

⁵ USA. Arizona State Legislature. House of Representatives. HB 2281 : Schools; Prohibited Courses; Discipline. By Steve Montenegro. Arizona State Legislature, 20 Jan. 2010. Web. 30 Apr. 2010.

⁶ Wallace, J.D. "Battle over Ethnic Studies Sends Students to the Streets." KOLD-TV. 7 May

  1. Web. 10 May 2010.

⁷ USA. Arizona State Legislature. State of Arizona Senate. SB 1108 : Arizona Revised
Statutes; relating to the homeland security advisory council. Arizona State Legislature 2008.

⁸ USA. House of Representatives, Arizona. SB 1069. Postsecondary Education Grants; Implementation. Sponsor: Senator Gray L. 2009.

* Education Week's annual report, Quality Counts;
"Arizona expended $6232 per student which is $2741 below the national average expenditure of $8973 per student. Arizona would have to increase per pupil spending by 44% to move to an amount equal to the national average expenditure per student. The cost to move Arizona to the national average is estimated to exceed $2.7 billion. "

** Prop100:
"The Tucson Unified School District has been losing 1,500 students annually for the last three years and is facing a deficit of as much as $45 million in the next school year. The amount will drop down to $17.3 million if the 1-cent-per-dollar state sales-tax increase is approved by voters on next Tuesday. "

Originally posted to Alfonso Nevarez on Mon May 17, 2010 at 11:13 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Excellent information and (8+ / 0-)

    evaluation of a stupid law.  I am glad you posted for cgibson.

    We need to teach people that the environment has a direct bearing on our own benefit. Dalai Lama

    by maggiejean on Mon May 17, 2010 at 11:18:50 AM PDT

  •  Personally, it's THIS law (11+ / 0-)

    that infuriates me more than the 'illegal immigrant' ban, which I don't see lasting very long in the face of legal challenges.  Even more, though, they can try to rationalize the other law as nothing more than copying federal law (it isn't), but there is no rationalization for this ethnic studies ban that isn't racist on the face of it.  It's a vile assault on teachers and students.  

    Ugh.  I can't even write about this clearly, I hate it so much.

    Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce

    by pico on Mon May 17, 2010 at 11:29:00 AM PDT

    •  I won't say it (4+ / 0-)

      bothers me MORE, but I can't think of a single speck of rationale for it that's not racist(and even trying made me twist my brain so much I had to stop.)
      Tom Horne's "Old South" "theory" is just such transparent crap I'd be shocked he can say it out loud, at least if there weren't a FNC.

      "You do *not* 'motherfuck' the National Guard." --Toni Bernette, Esq.

      by chicating on Mon May 17, 2010 at 11:47:59 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Sorry, I'm a teacher. (3+ / 0-)

        These things send me through the roof.  But you're right that it's not objectively worse, or anything like that.  

        Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce

        by pico on Mon May 17, 2010 at 11:54:11 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I would say it is more...insidious, yes. (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          mahakali overdrive

          This sounds gross, maybe, like I'm waiting for this expression of outrage to pimp myself, but I did write about this earlier this week.
          It is a real assault on intellectual freedom within the state.
          WHO "seems like the old South" again?
          Maybe they should also eliminate Psych courses so nobody ever learns what "projection" is either?!

          "You do *not* 'motherfuck' the National Guard." --Toni Bernette, Esq.

          by chicating on Mon May 17, 2010 at 12:01:57 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  Here's my diary (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          on this subject...

          I totally feel that that it's a horrifying lack of trust in teachers and students...I guess I feel so assaulted by this leg in every possible way, it's hard to quantify it all.

          "You do *not* 'motherfuck' the National Guard." --Toni Bernette, Esq.

          by chicating on Mon May 17, 2010 at 12:08:51 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Thank you so much for this diary. It is spot (5+ / 0-)

    on from what I knew but the research and facts here are so excellent. I have learned even more.  This law will have an impact that is even worse than the immigration law.  It simply must be challenged.

  •  How is this trickling up or affecting ethnic (4+ / 0-)

    studies programs-- for example, Chicano Studies, or African American Studies-- at University of Arizona?  Any sense of what's going on at the higher academe level around this ban, or in response to this ban?  

    •  It looks like it's limited to (4+ / 0-)

      public school (non-university level) only, but I can't imagine the response will be positive from academics.  It serves no purpose that isn't delimiting and condescending to the teachers and students.  

      Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce

      by pico on Mon May 17, 2010 at 11:53:46 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  They're still annoyed there (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      concernedamerican, pico, chicating, Alec82

      I spoke to a former Professor from an ethnic studies program at a large State University in Arizona just about two weeks ago (less?) and obviously this law doesn't directly affect the University programs BUT it discredits them as legitimate fields of study, which has their ire up. I don't think any formal statements have yet been made, however.

      I wound up with this person sort of by happenstance, but it was very interesting to kind of "grill" him on it. He had been in communication with some former colleagues. I shouldn't say more :)

      "Human salvation lies in the hands of the creatively maladjusted." -- MLK Jr.

      by mahakali overdrive on Mon May 17, 2010 at 12:04:13 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Your citations are exemplary (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    maracucho, Mother Mags, pico, chicating, Alec82

    and I would have never taken you for twenty. In all of the time that I've read your many comments, I'd always taken you for older and wiser ;)

    A very well-written piece. Thank you for this overview. I've not read it in full detail because I'm writing now myself. But skimming through, I will have to return to it. Thank you for assembling this material.

    "Human salvation lies in the hands of the creatively maladjusted." -- MLK Jr.

    by mahakali overdrive on Mon May 17, 2010 at 12:01:03 PM PDT

  •  Please tell me.. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    pico, mahakali overdrive

    ....that the ACLU is already preparing a legal challenge? This bill looks like it is on shaky grounds.  What in the hell does it mean to promote "ethnic solidarity" anyway?

    Policy, Peace and Progress Before Party

    by Alec82 on Mon May 17, 2010 at 12:05:00 PM PDT

    •  "Ethnic solidarity" means (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Got a Grip, Alec82, We Want Change

      deferential to white American history.  Horne's stated reasons for supporting the bill are 1. students were rude, 2. it must be the fault of la Raza, and 3. 'ethnic studies' were glossing over the difficulties of securing the border with Mexico (seriously).  He was also very upset at the history book that suggested that the Mexicans won the battle at the Alamo.  

      Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce

      by pico on Mon May 17, 2010 at 12:08:45 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  On what grounds? (0+ / 0-)

      I don't think this law is a good idea, or that it's somehow not racially motivated, but I'm not aware of any Constitutional argument that can be made against it.

      Public schools are always subject to control of their curricula from higher legislative authorities. Even the "intelligent design" policies have been kicked out only because there isn't a single non-religious argument to made in their favor, which runs them afoul of the Establishment Clause.

      What liberty interest is violated here?


      "It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." -- Emiliano Zapata Salazar
      "Dissent is patriotic. Blind obedience is treason." --me

      by Leftie Gunner on Mon May 17, 2010 at 03:58:49 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  First Amendment (0+ / 0-)

        For example:

        Since the court's discussion in Hazelwood School Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, supra, 484 U.S. 260 [98 L.Ed.2d 592, 108 S.Ct. 562] is not limited [***29]  to a school newspaper but rather refers to a wide variety of "curriculum" decisions,  [*146]  we believe the standard applied in that case should also be applied to the curriculum decision made here. This conclusion acknowledges the deference which is given to local school authorities regarding ordinary educational matters. "'[The] courts have traditionally been reluctant to intrude upon the domain of educational affairs, not only in recognition of their lack of educational competence in such matters, but also out of respect for the autonomy of educational institutions.'" ( Seyfried v. Walton, supra, 668 F.2d 214, 218 (conc. opn. of Rosenn, J.).) Therefore, respondents' decision to delete Grendel and One Hundred Years of Solitude from the curriculum will survive a First Amendment challenge so long as that decision is reasonably related to legitimate educational concerns. However, even under this broad standard, the school authorities' discretion is not unfettered. As we have explained, such a decision cannot be motivated by an intent to "prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion . . . ." ( Board of Education v. Barnette, supra, 319 U.S. 624, 642 [87 L.Ed. 1628, 1639].) [***30]  In other words, school authorities cannot substitute rigid and exclusive indoctrination for the mere exercise of their prerogative to make educational choices. ( Zykan v. Warsaw Community School Corp., supra, 631 F.2d 1300, 1306.)

        McCarthy v. Fletcher, 207 Cal App 3d 130 (1989) (applying First Amendment).

        There's a strong argument that the First Amendment protects a certain level of academic freedom for teachers, as I recall.  I don't think that there is a Supreme Court case squarely on point, but there's a colorable argument to be made.  Additionally, there may be state law claims.  For the record, I checked the ACLU website for the Arizona branch and they opposed it on First Amendment grounds.  It was only submitted to the governor on April 30; there was no update beyond that.

        Policy, Peace and Progress Before Party

        by Alec82 on Mon May 17, 2010 at 04:44:17 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Tom Horne also shut down Women's Studies (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mother Mags, pico, MKinTN, We Want Change

    when he was on the Paradise Valley school board. It was an elective high school class. He proudly brags about this 'accomplishment.' So clearly if the class is not taught from the perspective of a white male, it shouldn't exist.

  •  Thank you for posting this wonderful history (0+ / 0-)

    and explanation. I've worked in education in AZ for a long time, in a variety of capacities. When you read the restrictions listed in the bill, it would be very easy to use that language to shut down just about any course that doesn't teach the history of Great White Men.

    I sometimes teach Native American literature. Now how in the heck can you teach any Indian literature without "promoting resentment" toward the dominant culture? Hell, that's what a good bit of that literature is about, books like Leslie Silko's Ceremony, which I'd argue is required reading for all Arizonans (she lives in Tucson).

    Heaven forbid that we'd offer courses that would allow Hispanic, Black, Indian, or Asian kids to feel good about their culture!

    stay together / learn the flowers / go light - Gary Snyder

    by Mother Mags on Mon May 17, 2010 at 12:17:58 PM PDT

  •  Great video by La Raza students (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    We Want Change

    and teachers from a couple years ago showing/explaining about the Ethnic Studies classes in Tucson.  La Raza Students

  •  Exceptional work. My question for AZ pols is th (0+ / 0-)

    if my kids went to public school there, would they be allowed the same Spanish language and culture class that I had in Colorado back in the 1970s, which included language, literature, dance (at which I totally sucked), food, and parties.  Bear in mind, my Russian class go to do the same things.  What about it, AZ, can the kids conjugate poder, and uchitat, and still have a party?

    •  Speaking Spanish (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Alfonso Nevarez

      A while back TUSD made it a point to hire bilingual educators into the public school system, and they also allowed for a pay increase for those teachers willing to take Spanish classes in order to better communicate with their students. However, now they are laying off English teachers who have "heavy" accents.

      But I believe that for quite some time before they hired bilingual teachers, the community and the students had to fight for their right to speak their first language; which was Spanish.

  •  There's so much more! (5+ / 0-)

    Thanks to everyone who posted!

    More and more great insight on this bill keeps coming up:

    National Association for Ethnic Studies on HB 2281

    The wrong and right way to teach ethnic studies in Arizona

    Student Protesters on NPR

    CNN to visit TUSD classroom

    Arizona: For Whites Only?

    "Ethnic studies helps America to become truly American." - Dr. James Banks (University of Washington)

  •  Thank you so much for this information. I only (0+ / 0-)

    discovered and began to appreciate the role of my place in America as a Woman and Chicana by conducting my own investigations into my own family history. I complemented these investigations by taking a Chicano Ethnic Studies class.

    The importance of having classes like American History from the Mexican- American Perspective, for example, is that those voices were erased from the public records and previous mainstream history books; and any picture that doesn't take those voices into consideration is left incomplete.

    My ethnic studies have helped me to understand the important role that my family history has played in the success of the United States. I know that many Latino kids hang their head in shame because they have no sense of inclusion in this country or sense of history. All that they hear on the news is 'illegal alien', and hateful rhetoric about Latinos being freeloaders or recent immigrants who have nothing to contribute to society. There is talk amongst universities at least in California to do away with not only ethnic studies but women's studies as well. We cannot allow them to do this and must speak out and fight those who wish us to disappear from the history books. thank you so much for this information.

    "About that Hopey Changey Thing --Change takes Courage"

    by We Want Change on Mon May 17, 2010 at 01:17:35 PM PDT

  •  What happens in Aryanzona stays in Aryanzona (0+ / 0-)

    Republican brand of HOPE: "I HOPE HE FAILS"... Country First Anyone?

    by DFutureIsNow on Mon May 17, 2010 at 02:41:03 PM PDT

  •  Ole, brilliant diary. Tell your freind (0+ / 0-)

    they did a great job of explaining a complex issue in a clear, concise diary.  Too bad conservatives can't grasp complicated issues like this one.

    I discovered the meaning of life, but forgot to write it down.

    by dry heat dem on Mon May 17, 2010 at 04:07:21 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site