Skip to main content

This is esteemed blogger and jetset playboy iSenseChange reporting to you LIVE from the frontlines of the War on Information. Let's get into 'er!

This weekend, for me and a great many others it's all about the oil. I won't be paying attention to any Sestak nonstory items although Lizard Cheney will be on and I feel compelled to watch her like I'm compelled to look at traffic accidents as I drive by.

Prediction One: This weekend I expect lots of MEANINGLESS jibber jabber about whether Obama is pissed at BP enough or not and ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about the only viable solution at this juncture, that which is recommended by both Ralph Nader and former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, to whit: Obama seizes control of British Petroleum's North American assets (financial, equipment, transport and intellectual)and takes charge away from the kids that broke it, ensuring what is being done is in America's best interest, as opposed to BP's.  

Its basic, shoulda been done a long time ago and as Reich says, if we were dealing with a nuclear power plant, it woulda happened a long time time ago. It's called 'temporary recievership' and everybody, Obama included, is whistling Dixie until they do it.

*Prediction 2: Israel's actions vs the flotilla will be staunchly defended by politicans from the Left, anybody from the Right and the Moderator. So it shall be, so it has always been. Kos and Huff I predict to be sensible on the issue. Onwards!

* Oh Jesus, just caught a commercial on CNN by Lord Fauntleroy whatshis nuts, CEO of BP. Save the cash from the commercials, you dick, you're gonna need it.

*Since MSNBC isnt broadcasting today we're gonna start with Jake Tapper and 'This Week' on ABC NEWS. I've often thought Tapper a total asshole and am still quite prepared to continue labelling him so but the one thing he's doing which I would say is revolutionary is actually fact checking guests in the days that follow. How he can continue to even look world champion liar George Will in the eye without shaking his head and laughing his ass off is a mystery to me but it's not my show.

*Part of the high level of preparation that goes into this project from the iSenseChange Center for Positive Change is to contact guests from some of the shows I'm watching and seeing if I can get them to actually ask or answer relevent questions whilst all this 'news' is going on. I contacted Tapper first, through Twitter and asked the following:

"@jaketapper Too deep to fix is too deep to drill. Pass it on. #Oilspill
about 21 hours ago via web"

"@jaketapper Also, Im going 2 lose my mind if nobody on Sunday Talk shows @ least talks abt US Gov nationalizing BP & fixing the #Oilspill
about 21 hours ago via web"

Tapper responded, though he was careful not direct his response @ me so as I coudnt use it against him. Which is smart and I give him points for it:

"not sure anyone on the roundtable -- @Markos, @AriannaHuff, Will or Cheney -- will make the argument and i need to prep 2b devils advocate
about 16 hours ago via web"

A pussy answer but he covered his ass and who can blame him? Its nothing serious. Only journalism. And a massive ecosystem/economy crushing disaster

I should also note I approached Kos also:

"@markos Is anybody going to talk abt Gov nationalizing BPs US assets and taking charge of the situation tomorrow?
about 14 hours ago via web"

and Ariana Huffington with this little gem:

"@ariannahuff Too deep to fix is too deep to drill. Pass it on to serial liar George Will tomorrow"

No responses yet but the iSenseChange Center for Positive Change is just now gathering steam. Now on with the LiveBlog, Sensey, Jesus H!

*First up, Tapper and Admiral Thad Allen. I havent developed an opinion of the man but again, until somebody puts a bug up the President's ass to seize BP I suspect everybody and everything. Whattaya got to say, Admiral?

-First of all, whatever moderate successes are being reported by BP right now, that they're saving some quantity of oil from spilling into the Gulf, well, it has no meaning to me due to the fact that they've lied to me before. Might as well be Cheney telling me, is the way I look at it.

-Allen calls it 'a war' which is a start

-Tapper asks about whether Gov has been too trusting of BP and Allen says they have to work together due to BP having "the means of access." Get that? Gotta trust em because they own the toys. Prediction One rears its ugly head. Will Tapper push it? Nope. That's a FAIL, Tapper, perfect opportunity to ask it. What shit.

-A few hard hitting questions, credit where its due but as I say, unless we're talking about seizing BPs assets then the fox is still firmly in charge of the henhouse. Who's next?

* John Kerry and John Cornyn. I respect Kerry and I respect his mind. He goes toe to toe with Senator Cornhole, whom I respect not even slightly, which I guess is obvious. Let's see what happens...

-Alot of talk about accountability. Cornyn flirting with my theory One. Let's see how close he gets. Not close enough. Dick.

-Kerry repeats meme that Government can't do anything, BP has all the equipment, the 'knowhow' etc. This is shit and everybody should know it. Goes on to blame Bush and Cheney, which can never be done enough because its totally legitimate. Cornyn is grinning like a horny sheepdog to respond to it.

-Agree with everything Kerry said about an energy bill. Wonder if what is actually required in an energy bill to actually make a difference can ever emerge out of polluted entities like the American Congress or Senate. Doubtful to me, for alot of reasons I won't get into here.

-Cornyn advocates smaller solutions that won't change a lick. What a dick. Makes me sick. "Danke schoen, darlin' danke schoen..."

-Fairly strong case made by Kerry inre stepping up and getting something big done for energy production in the states.

* Flotilla:

-Cornyn blames the Flotilla, calls it a provocation as if that makes it okay

-Kerry toes the line. Israel has every right and no, they are not a strategic liabilty. That last part may well be the King Hell lie of the week but let's wait and see, Cheney's on the Roundtable this week...

-Kerry reminds us that "it's not just Israel performing this blockade, it is Israel and Egypt." There's some real moral authority for you. Egypt. Boo, Kerry. Boo.

-Tapper asking strong questions here. Actually impressed.

-Kerry expresses a limp wish to bring together both sides. Israel scuttled it, not for the first time during this administration.

-Another good question from Tapper to Kerry and Cornyn regarding this bizarre tendency of politicians on both sides of the aisle to lie about easily checkable war records or non war records. Kerry ducked it twice, leave it up to the voters, did at least admit that Blumenthal 'stepped over a line.'

*Roundtable: Oilspill

Wow, that's a LINEUP. Representing the Dark Side of the Force we have Serial Liar George Will and the utterly Insane Lizard Cheney, who should not be taken seriously by a single intellectual on earth. Representing all that is Good and Truthful we have Ariana Huffington and the Mighty Kos. Should be a decent dust-up.

-Jesus. Will wonders never cease. I actually agree with George Freaking Will. All this talk about the President's 'emotions' is indeed ridiculous, meaningless. No doubt he'll say something utterly full of crap in the next few minutes to vindicate his dickishness...

-Jesus Squared. I just agreed with Lizard Cheney?!? Ugh. I feel dirty. Bad dirty. But she's right, the BP image campaign is an atrocity. Focus on what matters. Actually, don't. The Gov needs to take over anyway.

-Kos on anger management. I didnt get alot out of it. Made a point abt need for regulation and the futility of 'drill baby drill.'

-Ariana on futility of Thad Allen saying he 'trusts BP' and trashes Bush/Cheney for lack of regulation

-Ariana comes out slugging, says it's "1000% Bush Cheney's fault" and then gives Obama some blame too. Strong showing from the Huff. Also good dig on Halliburton and Lizard pulls the talking over trick, Huff brings up Politifact, which is a kudos to Tapper and his show.

-Lizard talks about 'what the American people are afraid of' as if she's in any position to know. Heaven forbid any kind of slowing down on offshore drilling. Kos to respond, cut off by Tapper, I throw my fried eggs at the TV screen, which is stupid. Ketchup smears all over the screen which looks like the set and cast of 'This Week' has just been magically transported from the Palestinian Flotilla or something.

* Economy

-Huff makes strong point inre Structural problem versus Cyclical. Not afraid to drop some blame on Obama.

*Flotilla

-Liz makes the claim 'this isn't complicated.' Right. Course not. Love it. US is only major country not condemning Israel and Cheney calls it 'wrong and shameful' that Obama didnt go far enough defending Israel's open sea attack on international waters. That's why I call her 'Lizard'.

-Kos makes point about how Israel is only hurting itself, which is of course true and then Cheney gobbles up more airtime.

-Another solid point by Ariana about marginalizing extremists and reinforces Kos' point

-Cheney denies Israel has any control or resposibility for the conditions in Gaza. A bigger lie than Kerry's, though just barely, giving her King Hell Lie of the Week status. Let's see if Ironman Will can beat it...nope.

*On to baseball, and I'm tempted to say I don't care about anybody's opinion on it but it's actually a nice friendly chat and for what may well be the first time in history, Liz Cheney doesnt interrupt anybody.  

*Well, that's this week in MetaNews Analysis. Tapper did well, Huff was the strongest guest, Kos isnt great at being rude and interrupting obviously rude people like Lizard Cheney and I dont see that as a fault of his but I do see it as a fault of Tapper's when you let somebody interrupt and gobble up minutes as Cheney does everywhere she goes.

Both my predictions held 100% true, unfortunately. As I bring this to a close I would just like to say that the biggest underreported story about the Oilspill is exactly this: "Why doesnt the Obama administration put BP's US operations under temporary recievership." You can of course agree or disagree but the longer there is nobody talking about it, from all sides, the more suspicious you should be. Of everybody.

This is the blogger iSenseChange reporting to you LIVE from the front lines of the War on Information. Thanks, and have a GREAT day!

p.s. Too deep to fix is too deep to drill. Pass it on

Originally posted to iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 12:34 PM PDT.

Poll

Placing BPs US assets in recievership and Gov takes over Spill Response

69%32 votes
4%2 votes
19%9 votes
6%3 votes

| 46 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (11+ / 0-)

    "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

    by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 12:34:47 PM PDT

    •  Right now the Republicans are (5+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      laurak, chigh, iSenseChange, theKgirls, AnnieR

      failing around for an issue for the November elections. If the President were to seize BP even if only temporarily in my view it would give the Republicans a gift wrapped issue.

      Right now in the public's eye BP shares all or most of the blame for the unfolding tragedy. If the President were to seize BP, he would also be seizing 100% of the blame.  

      I would rather see him force BP with threat of losing all of their US lease holdings to change the dispersants they are using,and to use the most effective means necessary to clean the oil from the water, the marshes, and the beaches with out regard to cost.

      I would use BP to reduce unemployment in the South by hiring every able bodied person who wanted to work to help with the clean up, and I would force them to set aside funds now to rehabilitate the wildlife and for health clinics in the area effective immediately. All healthcare in the affected areas would be paid for by BP whether or not the issues could be directly related to the current oil spill as curative and preventative measures.  When I finished with BP, the states of LA, Miss. and Florida would be solid voting blocs for the Democratic Party.

      I'm asking you to believe. Not in my ability to bring about real change in Washington...I'm asking you to believe in yours. - Barack Obama

      by Blogvirgin on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 01:13:07 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I agree with everything you suggest (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        miriam

        Except for the Republican political stuff. theyll use this spill to trash Obama along with whatever else they can get their hands on regardless of what he does. Ultimately, your reason for not nationalizing BP is the solution that is best for the politics of the moment, not necessarily what is best for the environment, the Erath or even America's economic interests.

        "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

        by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 01:17:17 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Of course the GOP will trash Obama over the spill (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          iSenseChange

          and many so-called liberals have given them all the ammunition they need. We'll be seeing that James Carvil rant in GOP ads this fall, make no mistake.

          Things fall apart; the center cannot hold-Yeats Grab a mop- President Barack Obama

          by TexasMango on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 04:31:02 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Politics over doing what's right (0+ / 0-)

            BP should not be in control of the spill response and more and more people, Left Rgiht or whatever asre coming to that conclusion. Worse than any Repub parroting a Lib's response is if Obama could have done something and didnt. All the wishing and dreaming wont mean shit if a) BP continues to fuck this up (which they will, judging by recent history and b) Obama fails to take COMMAND of the situation.

            "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

            by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 04:35:58 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

    •  tipped and req'ed for Lizard Chaney lol n/t (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      iSenseChange

      New improved bipartisanship! Now comes in a convenient suppository!!! -unbozo

      by Unbozo on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 01:47:25 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I dont see the point of nationalizing (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JanL, iSenseChange, Coach Jay

    BP, even temporarily, if the government doesnt know what to do differently. If there is a technique or procedure, that the government thinks will work to stop the leak, that BP isnt trying, then I could see some value in the government taking over the operations to stop the leak. Otherwise, it doesnt seem like a great idea; the oil continues to gush into the Gulf, and now BP doesnt have to worry about finding a solution.

    •  BP has been incompetent at every level of this (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      miriam, AnnieR

      And, it's well documented that they have been less than honest about a wide array of things since the spill started.

      At the very least we can expect them to continue toi under-report things that thye will be expected to pay for in the future. For that reason alone its worth nationalizing, especially since we're dealing with billions of dollars.

      From a 'doing the right thing' perspective, as Reich said, is there any question this would have already been done if this were a nuclear power plant failure?

      "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

      by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 12:57:36 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  And I would add (5+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        miriam, PeteZerria, Hirodog, LinSea, AnnieR

        BPs engineers may well have ideas that are being kiboshed by the high muckety mucks in BP due to BP profitability concerns instead of whats best for the US and the Earth

        "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

        by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 12:59:31 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  And Obama may have secret Area 51 technology (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          JanL, iSenseChange

          that might stop the flow of oil, go back in time and never let the whole thing happen.

          I'm not for taking over BP's NA assets because

          1. Nothing de facto on the ground will change, the same people will be in charge, ie BP/Big Oil engineers.
          1.  It would only make the spill "Obama's Spill."

          So what's the benefit?  A CT "BP could stop this now but their actually making money on this"?

          •  This is not tinfoil conspiracy theory shit (0+ / 0-)

            We STILL have no reason to trust BPO and all sorts of reasons to distrust it. Place Gov directly in charge and limit how muich more BP can fuck it up

            At the very least you can admit that its an option that should be at least mentioned in the MSM, almost every time someone mentions they massive amounts of people that now distrust BP.

            And again, if people took this as seriously as a nuclear power plant disaster (and it is the largest environmental disaster in American history)there's no question that this would have been done already.

            As for it being Obama's Spill? Well, he's taking it on the chin every day right now, fairly or not

            "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

            by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 01:13:09 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  How? (2+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              George, iSenseChange

              Place Gov directly in charge and limit how much more BP can fuck it up

              How?  What would change?

              And again, if people took this as seriously as a nuclear power plant disaster (and it is the largest environmental disaster in American history)there's no question that this would have been done already.

              I think people are taking this as seriously as a nuke disaster, but there's a huge difference:  the government has a huge amount of expertise in nuclear energy management.  See Navy, nuclear powered.  The govt has NO expertise in oil management.  Who did we call in 1991-92 when Iraq set Kuwait's oil wells ablaze?  Red Adair.  

              And yeah, I'm calling BS on the idea that BP is somehow sitting on the magic process to stop this thing and not doing it because it's too expensive.  They're an evil, soulless corporation beholden to the mighty dollar.  And it's in the best interest of their bottom line to get this fixed ASAP.  If they had that button, they would have pressed immediately.

              •  BPs NA assets can certainly be nationalized (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:
                miriam

                That's 'the How'. Robert Reich explains it better than I ever could and it is certainly worth entering into the National Debate on WTF to do about this mess.

                What would it change? The Gov would then have control of all of BPs assets, including their engineers, equipment, monitoring devises,etc, everything that everybody claims is why BP should remain in control can and should be transferred to Gov control.

                Do I think BP has some magic solution? Maybe not. Am I certain that if they did have a solution that would cost them more money longterm than what they figure they'll end up paying when all is said and done anyways that they'd keep it under their hat? You bet I am.  I expect BP to do what's right for BP, not necessarily what is best for the disaster

                "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

                by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 01:42:31 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  I want to stop this thing ASAP (1+ / 0-)
                  Recommended by:
                  iSenseChange

                  and I don't see how nationalizing BPs NA assets will accomplish that.  Nothing will happen any faster.  If anything, this would slow the whole thing down.

                  Am I certain that if they did have a solution that would cost them more money longterm than what they figure they'll end up paying when all is said and done anyways that they'd keep it under their hat? You bet I am.

                  This is what I'm calling BS on.  What process would this be?  What situation that is worse than this would they be saving it for?  

                  You haven't answered my basic question:  How would nationalizing make this process faster/better?  What government assets/engineers/processes will suddenly become more available with nationalization?  What BP processes/engineers will suddenly become more effective/more available?  Some secret process that nobody has talked about?  

                  Frankly, I believe nationalization is good for one outcome and one only:  liquidation and punishment of a corporation.  But even if we nationalize them, buy Constitutional law, we have to compensate the bastards.  If anything, BP and their shareholders would LOVE nationalization, because it would make the bailouts last year look like chump change.

                  •  Here's one solution right here (1+ / 0-)
                    Recommended by:
                    miriam

                    Here's what former Shell chief recommends. It's what they did for that big Gulf of Arabia spill some years back.

                    Ultimately it comes down to trust. BP is not trustowrthy but their resources are required to fix the spill. Putting them into recivership is legal and should at least be discussed on the National stage

                    "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

                    by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 02:21:10 PM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

                    •  Nope (1+ / 0-)
                      Recommended by:
                      miriam

                      Gov doesnt have to compensate shit. Other way around if BP has stepped on its dick, which it clearly has.

                      What is beyond a doubt is that BP has shown itself to be untrustworthy over and over again. With Gov controlling all assets we take these clowns out of the position to cause yet more harm by pursuing their own interests first and the disaster second.

                      Where you and I disagree is that you seem to think what is best for BP at this phase is also what is best for the disaster. I disagree, I expect them to make decisions based on what is best for their bottom line, not necessarily the disaster

                      "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

                      by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 02:27:38 PM PDT

                      [ Parent ]

                    •  If you're not going to answer my question (1+ / 0-)
                      Recommended by:
                      iSenseChange

                      then why are we having this conversation?

                      And the old super sucking supertankers.  Yay, here we go again.  It's nice to be revisiting conversations from back in May.  The White House forced BP to drill an extra relief well when they only wanted to do one.  If this would work, I believe it would be put in place, not by BP, but by the White House.

                      But other than "trust," again, what changes?  The only result of a nationalization of BP would be a huge jump in the BP stock price, because the government is suddenly on the hook for all the lawsuits.

                      •  isnt 'the Trust' important? (0+ / 0-)

                        Crucial? Don't we want to be certain that proper steps are being taken and that the Truth is being reported? That is the difference and it is the answer to your question. You have greater faith in BP than I do, friend, to do what is the right thing as opposed to the fiscally better thing.  

                        BP f'd up and lied about everything they had a chance to since the thing started. You take it out of their hands. Thats my answer and if it's not good enough for you then again, I say you have more faith in BP to put things right than I do

                        What is beyond a shadow of a doubt is BP will fudge reports and whatnot to limit their responsibility wherever possible. Gov control of problem can mitigate that

                        As for this convo in May, why don't you explain to me why the super sucking supertankers shouldnt be deployed in this instance. What do you know that the former head of Shell Oil doesn't? Genuinely curious.

                        "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

                        by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 02:52:56 PM PDT

                        [ Parent ]

          •  Pssssst (0+ / 0-)

            Here's some Area 51 solutions that should be happening but ain't.

            "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

            by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 02:00:22 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks for your work on this so I'm not (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    laurak, iSenseChange

    the one having to clean the ketchup from my screen. :o)

    Dance lightly upon the earth, sing her songs with abandon, smile upon all forms of life, and be well.

    by LinSea on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 12:59:31 PM PDT

  •  Whenever (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    iSenseChange

    I am subjEcted to the scum that is Liz Cheney I say her only talent would be to be a Tonya Harding double. But Harding is much smarter and a Far more decent person than that obnoxious little bratM

    •  I could go on all day (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Dixiedemocrat

      About all things Liz Cheney. First and foremost its amazing what high level of batshit she can come up with and still get a seat on any news panel she wants. So much for the much vaunted Left Wing Media Conspiracy

      "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

      by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 02:01:57 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Liz Cheney is evidence (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        iSenseChange

        of the corporate owned media.  That's why Daddy's mouth-piece gets a seat at the table.  I mean what's up with giving adult progeny of famous politicians a seat at the table?  Maybe MTP (which I now call - "Meet the Pissant" - David Gregory) should host a Sunday with Chelsea Clinton, Lizard Cheney, Amy Carter, Bristol Palin and Meghan McCain.  It could only increase the ratings, particularly if there is mud wrestling!  

        Great diary, diarist.  Thanks.

        "The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." - Flannery O'Conner

        by Dixiedemocrat on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 03:06:48 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  It's LONG past time (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    iSenseChange

    to be talking about political fall-out and trusting BP to concern itself with anything but BP.  The single most important thing--the ONLY important thing right now--is stopping that oil from gushing into the GUlf.  Who knows what failures lurk behind the intended relief well efforts?  BP hasn't give us any reason for confidence in believing  August is the date for finality on this catastrophe.  With BP in charge it could go on for much longer. I also cannot believe that relying solely on BP is the only possible remedy.          

  •  I was disappointed in Kos (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    iSenseChange

    If he can't debate intelligently and forcefully in a round table format like that (where everyone on the right eats up airtime), he should stay off the teevee.

    Arianna, on the other hand, has it down to a science. She is a seasoned pro.

    "Tomorrow Glenn Beck's army of zombie retirees are marching on Washington in protest of, well, everything. It's the Million Moron March.." - Bill Maher

    by AZ RedWingsFan on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 02:44:04 PM PDT

    •  Me too (0+ / 0-)

      Kos does well on Olbermann but like I said in the diary, he isnt great at being rude and interrupting someone like Cheney. Its more to Kos' credit and due to the nature of the debate but it doesnt help the cause much.

      The Huff does kick some ass when she wants to

      "If that's what Fallujah is, then what's that band with all the Mexican kids in it?"

      by iSenseChange on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 02:45:33 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Bring Rachel back (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    iSenseChange

    to Meet the Pissant.  Best damn journalist since Walter Cronkite.  We are not worthy.

    "The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." - Flannery O'Conner

    by Dixiedemocrat on Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 03:08:45 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site