Skip to main content

I'm sure you all are aware of the diary atop the rec list that trumpets our fearless (chuckle) President's decision to reject a few MTR permits.

While this in itself is not a bad thing (and has some beneficial local environmental effects), the time to do something about our coal USE is far more important.

And at this moment, President Obama is currently scheming to get a cap-free, pollution loving energy bill through the Senate.

This sort of thing does not happen because Obama is a great environmental president. This sort of thing happens because the President is trying to put one over on us.

He knows a cap on carbon won't pass. So, he pulls his MTR permit pander out of the "break glass in case of having no political balls to pass comprehensive reform" case and then expects us to shower him with kisses.

The diary atop the rec list takes this approach.

I beg you all to reconsider.

Doing something about climate change in such a way as to actually have an impact on its outcome requires huge, systemic change. It requires bold, presidential, Lincolnesque leadership.

Leadership that this president is not providing.

So I beg of you: don't give him the satisfaction of your adoration of his environmental bona fides.

Kill the energy bill. The NRDC knows it's crap. So should you.

But, knowing that some are still calling for the Senate to think small by passing a bill that just boosts energy production from clean and dirty sources, I thought it would help to outline five reasons why a comprehensive package will do more for national security, the economy, the budget and the environment than an energy-only bill.

Independent analyses show that a strong comprehensive clean energy and climate bill would:

   * Cut US oil imports in half, by reducing our dependence on oil and enabling US producers to maximize the output of aging land-based wells, according to Advanced Resources International. An energy-only bill won’t.
   * Cut Iran’s oil revenues by $100 million. A strong limit on carbon pollution could significantly cut the flow of petrodollars to Iran, which would lose approximately $1.8 trillion worth of oil revenues over the next forty years. Meanwhile, an energy-only bill would do little to reduce U.S. oil imports beyond opening new areas of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) to oil drilling with all the attendant environmental problems.
   * Cut our budget deficit by $24 billion between 2010 and 2019, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). An energy-only bill would increase the deficit by $13.5 billion over the same time period, according the CBO’s analysis.
   * Create about 1.9 million jobs, according to independent analysis by the University of California and further substantiated by a literature review by Third Way. That’s nearly four times as many jobs as an energy-only bill would create.
   * Cut 2 billion metric tons of global warming pollution from 2005 levels, by 2020. An energy only bill would at best cut just a tenth of that amount, but could also increase pollution levels depending on its details.

Anyone contemplating supporting energy-only over a comprehensive bill should bear these facts in mind. And realize that whether your top priority is national security, deficit reduction, job creation or pollution reduction, a comprehensive bill clean energy and climate bill does a lot more for our country.

Originally posted to I said GOOD DAY sir on Sun Jun 20, 2010 at 09:11 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site