Skip to main content

The U.S. middle class is dying.
America Without A Middle Class--It's Not As Far Away As You Might Think, by Elizabeth Warren, Alternet.Org, 12/5/09 (IMHO, everyone here should read this piece...again.)
Shorting The Middle Class: The Real Wall Street Crime

Long-term unemployment is record-breaking.
Cutting Off the Unemployed (Today's NY Times Editorial)

The deficit hawks are winning.
That 30s Feeling...
Pete Peterson Has Won: Americans Rate Federal Debt as Top Threat

U.S. poverty is to the point where more Americans than ever need help just to keep from starving.
Krugman + 100 Million: Mr. President, "Find Your Inner F.D.R."

State and municipal budgets across our country are collapsing.
States and cities on the "verge of system failure"

The housing market is still sinking.
Meredith Whitney: "No Doubt We Have Entered A Double-Dip For Housing"
Existing Homes: Months of Supply and House Prices
(NOTE: IMHO, the cascading effects of another [projected] 10% drop in home prices in this country are considerably more devastating than many Americans may realize.  More than half of this country's mortgageholders will be underwater by year's end--already--according to recent surveys by Barclays and Deutschebank. When the public loses wealth, they don't spend. Foreclosures increase. Banks lose more money [and/or our government goes deeper in the hole, because the government is the only entity financing home purchases these days]. Municipal tax bases further erode. More jobs are lost. And, the velocity of our economy's deflationary spiral, much more than likely, is significantly  increased.)

"Official" joblessness levels are still in the 10% range, where they have been stagnating.
Romer, Orszag, Geithner: ≥9.7% Jobless Through 2010
Bernanke: "Very Weak Hiring," RE/CRE Undermining Recovery

The income gap between the haves and the have-nots, already eclipsing the greatest level of inequality ever recorded in U.S. history (which was in 1928, just before the stock market collapsed), is widening.
Slouching toward neofeudalism

The myth of financial regulatory reform is, in fact, D.O.A. and, the banksters are still the ones perpetrating the fraud as we watch that travesty continuing.
Dead On Arrival: Financial Reform Fails (Simon Johnson)
Volcker Rule Under Attack as Lawmakers Seek Hedge Fund Loophole (Also from today's NY Times)

The big banks and the status quo are the only ones profiting.
Six Banks Made $51 Billion in `09 (The rest lost money)

Credit on Main Street has been steadily diminishing.
The Credit Crunch Continues

MEANWHILE, TIMOTHY GEITHNER IS STILL LYING.
Geithner Yet Again Misrepresents TARP "Performance"
Cognitive Dissonance: "The Cabal," Wall St Crimes & Mid-Terms

However, it's morphed into propaganda that the majority of the U.S. public is no longer buying.
Poll Finds Deep Concern About Energy and Economy

While the chances of a double-dip recession keep escalating.
Double Dip Debate Escalates

(Is this brand of corporatist, kleptocratic bullsh*t something that YOU are still believing?)
Tim Geithner Has Completely Forgotten the Point of TARP, Calls it a Success

#            #            #


Tim Geithner Has Completely Forgotten the Point of TARP, Calls it a Success
Phil's Stock World
Courtesy of Jr. Deputy Accountant
June 22, 2010

Maybe Tim Geithner was too busy scheming on backroom bailouts running the NY Fed around the time TARP was passed but it appears as though he has forgotten that its original intention was to foster improved credit conditions for US consumers. OK wait, its truly original intention was to buy up crap assets but that got ditched shortly after it was passed so let's go with "bank lending" instead. Either way, he seems to be confused as to the definition of "working".

CNN Money:


Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner defended the government's bailout of the financial system on Tuesday, saying it has been a "critical" part of the economic recovery...

--SNIP--

While the economy remains challenged, Geithner said TARP and other "extraordinary actions" taken to combat the financial meltdown "have helped stabilize the financial system and restore economic growth."

So what WAS the goal, exactly, Timmy? Free money for the bankers? Some kind of sick money laundering operation using the sick banks to buy up Treasury debt? You tell me since you're the one who seemed to think it worked out the way it was supposed to.

I'll be over here waiting for credit markets to unfreeze whenever you're ready to talk.

#            #            #
(Diarist has received written authorization from Naked Capitalism Publisher Yves Smith to reprint her blog's diaries in their entirety.)

Geithner Yet Again Misrepresents TARP "Performance"
Yves Smith
Naked Capitalism
Wednesday, June 23, 2010

The problem with propaganda is that it is generally effective. Utter the Big Lie often enough and most people will come to believe it.

The Obama Administration has engaged in persistent misrepresentation of the outcome of the TARP equity injections, which is a manifestation of its early decision to reconstitute as much as possible, the banking industry that had just driven itself and the global economy off the cliff. Albert Einstein defined insanity as "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." The decision of the new Administration to cast its lot with an unreformed banking industry locked it into a course of action. As we noted earlier,


Thus Obama's incentives are to come up with "solutions" that paper over problems, avoid meaningful conflict with the industry, minimize complaints, and restore the old practice of using leverage and investment gains to cover up stagnation in worker incomes. Potemkin reforms dovetail with the financial service industry's goal of forestalling any measures that would interfere with its looting.

Yves here. One place that frequent repetitions of the Big Lie might not work so well is relative to the TARP, where the overwhelming majority of Americans were so opposed to bank bailouts with no pain inflicted on the recipients that any attempts to call the effort a success might simply serve to reopen a festering wound. But let's not take any chances.

Today, a New York Times headline extols, "Banks Have Repaid 75% Of Bailout, Geithner Says." Their summary:


The Treasury secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, said on Tuesday that taxpayers were recovering their investment from the financial bailouts as the program was wound down. But he acknowledged there would probably be a loss from the rescue of the insurer American International Group.

From his testimony:


We closed the Capital Purchase Program, under which the bulk of support to banks has been provided. To date, banks have repaid approximately 75 percent of TARP funds they received, and TARP investments in banks have generated taxpayers $21 billion in income from dividends, sales of warrants and stock, and fees from cancelled guarantees. We expect TARP investments in banks to generate a positive return on the whole.

Yves here. Let's debunk the two overarching messages:

      1. Taxpayers got a good deal

      2. "Paying back" the TARP is a sign of success of the program

Start with the "good deal" myth. Note that while Geithner does use the word "investment" from time to time, he and Obama when talking about the TARP have most often used the turn of phrase "pay back."

Some members of the public might hear the "pay back" and assume the funding had been via debt. Instead, the Capital Purchase Program program was senior preferred stock plus equity warrants. The Treasury did build in some mechanisms to encourage return of the funds (preferred dividends increased from 5% to 9% after year 5, for instance). But there was no immediate pressure in the deal terms to lead a quick return of the funds to necessarily be a good thing.

Most important, the key metric as to whether the deal was a good deal is not the speed of repayment, as the Adminstration's boosterism implies, but whether the deal was a good one given market conditions as of October 2008. Answer: not at all. The deal was lousy on its face, and it did NOT serve to advance what should have been the overarching objective, namely, putting the industry on sounder terms, say by using the leverage to extract key concessions. Instead, this was another manifestation that the officialdom has adopted through the entire crisis: patch the system up with duct tape and baling wire, and if it looks even remotely operational, tout it as tremendous success. We noted at the time the equity injections were announced:


But here we go, virtually no restrictions (the Bloomberg article mentions executive comp limits, but given Paulson's stance, expect this to be cosmetic), no (a la Sweden) having a disciplined process to figure out who was worth salvaging and concentrating rescue dollars on them, and having a strategy (consolidation, liquidation, spinning bad assets off into an Resolution Trust type "bad bank" vehicle) for the ones that didn't make the cut.

For those who may forget the details, Paulson hauled what were to be the main TARP recipients, hectored them for nearly two hours about how they were gonna take the money, then after this faux show of force, unveiled attractive terms. Not surprisingly, the banks fell into line.

But let's turn to the even bigger issue: was it a good idea for the banks to be so quick to pay back their TARP funds? Marshall Auerback shredded that idea:


This whole line about "taxpayers to recover bailout money" is based on an accounting fraud, because accounting abuses are the primary means by which TARP recipients have repaid bailout money -- putting us at greater risk. That may seem paradoxical, but the rush to repay is driven by a desire to have unrestrained executive bonuses (a very bad thing associated with far greater accounting fraud and failures -- requiring future, larger taxpayer bailouts) and accounting abuses produce the (fictional) ability to repay the United States (primarily by failing to recognize existing losses). The TARP recipients weakened their financial condition, and increased moral hazard, when they rushed to repay the TARP funds. Both factors increase the risk of making more expensive future bailouts more likely.

Yves here. Technically, the accounting isn't fraudulent, since the banks have gotten so many variances (it's called regulatory forebearance). But the profits and equity levels banks are reporting are more than a tad misleading.

Extend and pretend is rampant. Not only are asset values inflated by super cheap funding, which is not going to be with us forever, but there is considerable evidence that banks are making assets at utterly indefensible levels. We've pointed repeatedly to Mike Konczal's quick and dirty analysis of second mortgages, which suggests the four biggest banks are overstating their equity by roughly $150 billion. We have also had readers who work at dealer banks tell us of wildly unrealistic marks on CMBS. And the big banks, per Chris Whalen, are reporting unrealistic earnings and equity levels due to taking insufficiently low loan loss reserves.

But Geithner would have you believe all is well in bank-land. Paulson discovered he could not kick the can down the road to the next Adminsitration. Team Obama believes he will be re-elected, and it presumably does not think it can paper over problems for another six years. Thus it appears they are unable to distinguish between mere cosmetics and real progress. Scary indeed.

#            #            #

Can we handle the truth?
Our "reverse Robin Hood," corporate kleptocracy has already cost us trillions of dollars.  
The Bailout of Big American Banks Has Cost Trillions More Than We've Been Told

Or, will we just continue to defend these lies?
Banks Have Repaid 75% Of Bailout, Geithner Says.

Thoughts?

Originally posted to http://www.dailykos.com/user/bobswern on Wed Jun 23, 2010 at 01:52 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

jbou, Thumb, Alumbrados, paradox, Ed in Montana, cdreid, Angie in WA State, Mimikatz, rick, tmo, SteveLCo, tgs1952, LeislerNYC, Chi, Odysseus, slinkerwink, emal, tnichlsn, Shockwave, Pescadero Bill, Wintermute, billlaurelMD, tacet, hyperstation, LEP, Sandy on Signal, Bryce in Seattle, mataliandy, givmeliberty, Jerome a Paris, zeitshabba, Creosote, erinmblair, hestal, nyceve, marsbardem, boadicea, chuckvw, buckhorn okie, Aquarius40, roses, JuliaAnn, bruh1, mollyd, Boxers, Jesterfox, k9disc, Braindead, psnyder, Dallasdoc, CitizenOfEarth, pat bunny, gmb, bula, alivingston, gerrilea, JimWilson, NYFM, Patricia, nika7k, Timbuk3, lcrp, alizard, Pohjola, SingleVoter, dkmich, Diana in NoVa, zerelda, Lefty Mama, CanYouBeAngryAndStillDream, Deward Hastings, poemworld, vacantlook, xxdr zombiexx, bay of arizona, environmentalist, greenskeeper, joanneleon, Massman, tovan, 3goldens, PAbluestater, NoMoreLies, Independent Musings, PBen, Paul Goodman, Superpole, Flint, run around, frandor55, eightlivesleft, drewfromct, Brooke In Seattle, trinityfly, ratzo, Mz Kleen, Chaoslillith, EdlinUser, where4art, jcitybone, Sandino, deepsouthdoug, Lindy, doe, SocioSam, mightymouse, jay23, xaxnar, Jim P, SSMir, SoulCatcher, Grassee, esquimaux, tarheelblue, Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse, Kingsmeg, vigilant meerkat, BlueInARedState, tonyahky, koNko, The Wizard, blueoasis, KozmoD, NBBooks, DarkestHour, MJ via Chicago, Glorfindel, Bob Sackamento, imabluemerkin, real world chick, JVolvo, Sagebrush Bob, NearlyNormal, bleeding heart, Preston S, el cid, sceptical observer, a small quiet voice, profh, Persiflage, docimm, Cassiodorus, goinsouth, shaharazade, PhilW, PoxOnYou, kurious, bstotts, CharlieHipHop, Johnathan Ivan, Friend of the court, PatriciaVa, seabos84, bigchin, One Pissed Off Liberal, Noor B, DorothyT, Ken in MN, dotsright, wa ma, byDesign, Margfh, Positronicus, terryhallinan, yoduuuh do or do not, Jimdotz, ezdidit, BehereBenow, Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle, ilex, DWG, Unbozo, newpioneer, bnasley, Orange County Liberal, artisan, Kentucky Kid, millwood, Moderation, pioneer111, CT Hank, LWelsch, JML9999, cloudbustingkid, Spruce, Fossil, Mr Stagger Lee, Involuntary Exile, elwior, Mr Rick, KJG52, MrJayTee, Wek, icebergslim, PaulD, bluesheep, royalscam, banger, pragprogress, petulans, Ruff Limblog, o the umanity, luckylizard, aigeanta, DixieDishrag, BYw, allie123, magicsister, Robobagpiper, billybam, sydneyluv, Mike Taylor, papicek, statsone, squarewheel, ZhenRen, LaFeminista, SciMathGuy, Florene, nippersdad, two roads, greengemini, divineorder, radmul, ewmorr, timethief, Mislead, Nebraskablue, WiseFerret, Partisan Progressive, mkor7, CamillesDad1, JesseCW, John Shade, obiterdictum, kevinpdx, ohmyheck, futureliveshere, Randtntx, ratmach, Words In Action, coppercelt, 1000 Points of Fright, UTvoter, Crabby Abbey, Eddie L, melpomene1, ctlrick, OnlyWords, Earth Ling, albrt, JRandomPoster, Betty Pinson, roystah, elengul, Oh Mary Oh, fiercefilms, Actbriniel, slice, Colorado is the Shiznit, allenjo, nicethugbert, Susipsych, BlackQueen40, QuestionAuthority, Situational Lefty, marleycat, dle2GA, tardis10, LSmith, createpeace, Vtdblue, Carbunkle Rugburn, Faroutman, corvaire, PhilJD, blue aardvark, Oilwellian, Anthony Page aka SecondComing, That Korean Guy, Sunspots, Ezekial 23 20, PrometheusUnbound, Azazello, James Robinson, ridemybike, dendron gnostic, gnostradamus, FireBird1, Williston Barrett, dance you monster

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site