Do you guys remember that guy, Objectivo, who has since been banned from this site, who was perhaps the first and only Kossack ever to hold the opinion (prior to the Arkansas Dem. primary) that Reseearch2000 was a biased pollster, on the grounds that they used favorability numbers instead of job approval in regard to President Obama (favorability #'s look more swell), and as they had Coakley and Brown tied just prior to the elections in Massachussets (Brown won by 5%). Here is the link to that analysis.
http://www.dailykos.com/...
I mean, seriously. Who else did favorability alone without job approval?
I agree with my good friend Objectivo (RIP).
Now Kos is raising the possibility of R2000 defrauding the Daily Kos, which I understand.
Meanwhile, Clueless commenters call the banned prophet "lame" and "troll" in the aforementioned diary, because he/she dared criticized a company affiliated with the website we love. No wonder (almost) everyone was caught by surprise by Kos' statement today. And don't tell me you were not surprised unless you criticized R2000 prior to the Arkansas' elections.
Too many in this community are too biased as well. And excessive bias clouds judgment.