Skip to main content

Right, only after the outrage that's been boiling for the past couple months spilled over onto the stove.

A foreign company causes a disaster on our shores and they are able to dictate to our press the terms of their coverage. It's obvious to anybody paying attention that BP here is trying to handle their already horrendous PR situation by limiting the amount of coverage on the spill and it's effects on the area.

Not only that but they also aren't providing their cleanup workers adequate safety equipment.

Well there's one reason you wouldn't want to have reporters documenting the response.

Not but some weeks ago the 1st amendment was suspended by Thad Allen:

All media have been banned. In yet another sign of just how far free speech rights in the United States have fallen, "National Incident Commander" Thad Allen has banned all media access to oil clean up sites in or around the Gulf of Mexico. Instead of devoting all of their energy to trying to save the environment in the Gulf of Mexico, BP and the U.S. government seem absolutely obsessed from keeping people away from seeing what is really going on.

If you didn't see a corporation's hold over our government then you should have after that. It is only in BP's interest that the media be banned from reporting and actually commiting acts of journalism. So if you were to try and report you'd be fined and possibly jailed.

Save The Environment:

It is now a class B felony that carries a fine of up to $40,000 for any media representative to come within the 65 foot "exclusion zone" that has been established.  That means that all members of the media - print, television, radio and bloggers - are banned from coming within 65 feet of anything important down in the Gulf of Mexico.

That's why there are limited pictures of dead animals, limited pictures of actual workers cleaning, no real videos and interviews of the people involved.

That's why I chose the title for this diary.

"We have provided unprecedented media access to the largest oil spill response in US history."


National Incident Commander Admiral Thad Allen today announced new procedures to allow media free travel within the 20-meter boom safety zones if they have followed simple procedures for credentialing, and provided they follow certain rules and guidelines.

"I have put out a direction that the press are to have clear, unfettered access to this event, with two exceptions -- if there is a safety or security concern," said Allen. "This boom is critical to the defense of the marshes and the beaches."

"We need to discriminate between media, which have a reason to be there and somebody who's hanging around when we know that we've had equipment vital to this region damaged," Allen said.

"We have provided unprecedented media access to the largest oil spill response in US history. We want the media and the public to see the tremendous unity of effort of 40,000 federal, state and local responders. We have provided hundreds of embarks on CG vessels and aircraft and we are offering overnight visits on a 210-foot Cutter forty miles offshore at the well site. We believe that by providing the media credentials for vessels, we will increase the ability of the media and the public to see the response effort," said Captain Jim McPherson, USCG spokesman.

Thanks to a Julia Dermansky, we do have these photos to show people and to see for ourselves.

Thad Allen should be replaced with somebody who has America's best interest at heart, not BP. If nobody was paying attention, this ban on the 1st amendment wouldn't have been lifted at all, but thanks to the digital age and the Internet, nobody hides anymore.

Originally posted to TrahmalG on Tue Jul 13, 2010 at 09:43 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips or Flames (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pam from Calif, maggiejean

    I think it's great though that they're saying this ban was lifted due to public outcry. If we make enough of a fuss then we probably would get what we deserve.

    "A nation that continues...spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom." *Martin Luther King, Jr.*

    by TrahmalG on Tue Jul 13, 2010 at 09:51:41 PM PDT

  •  Thad Allen is following orders... (6+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Samer, chickeee, Uberbah, MGross, erichiro, TrahmalG

    of that you can be absolutely certain.

    It's a serious error to not allow media access.  I mentioned somewhere else that I think people are drawing the wrong conclusions--I don't think the government is protecting BP. I think they are trying to avoid embarrassment.  

    •  Wouldn't it be more (0+ / 0-)

      embarrassing and hurtful to the Gov to ban media from reporting something like this crisis?

      "A nation that continues...spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom." *Martin Luther King, Jr.*

      by TrahmalG on Tue Jul 13, 2010 at 10:16:59 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Doesn't compute when you have live cams (0+ / 0-)

      showing the gusher 24x7 on teh tevee and intertubes.

      BP - Proving Oil and Water do mix.
      A Presidency Among the Vuvuzelas.

      by amk for obama on Tue Jul 13, 2010 at 11:27:54 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Avoid embarrassment of what? (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      phonegery, Uberbah

      They still want to drill offshore and every image that comes out makes one more "drill baby drill(er)" have an epiphany. The consent of the public to continue drilling offshore in deep-water is what they're protecting, imo.

    •  Embarrassment (0+ / 0-)

      Remember this oil spill is an embarrassment to BP... and the US government.  It is to the benefit of our administration to minimize the PR disaster to themselves, as well as BP.

      A press blackout makes a lot of sense to both BP and the government.  Something you would expect Bush/Cheney to do.

  •  Huh. 20 meters is 65 ft. (4+ / 0-)

    I'm not sure how removing a 65 ft ban and replacing it with a 20 meter one... is this snark?

    I'm missing something here.

    Until we break the corporate virtual monopoly on what we hear and see, we keep losing, don't matter what we do.

    by Jim P on Tue Jul 13, 2010 at 10:59:39 PM PDT

  •  What if (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    @ the outset a bunch of the photographers basically said "Fuck you!" and blatantly, openly disobeyed that ban.

    liberal bias = failure to validate or sufficiently flatter the conservative narrative on any given subject

    by RockyMtnLib on Tue Jul 13, 2010 at 11:43:31 PM PDT

    •  then we would have a free press (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      and we manifestly do not. when the government or a corporation don't want press somewhere, the press is intimidated. too damned easily. the rest of the time they are too damned lazy to bother.
      "Home of the Brave". My ass.

      I heard Thad Allen talking about the new cap adventure, and he exclusively used the word "we" throughout. Either it's a case of Stockholm Syndrome, or Thad has completely forgotten who pays his salary.

      The Republican Party will never die until there is a new political home for racists.

      by kamarvt on Wed Jul 14, 2010 at 06:03:31 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site