Skip to main content

Saying no only goes so far. The Congressional Republicans obstructionism has been purely a political strategy, but it is a shortsighted political strategy with no long term vision. Perhaps that is because that Republicans have no long term vision, and that their campaign agenda amounts to nothing but clichés and platitudes. Over the course of the primary campaign season we have heard Republican candidates use phrases like "pro-growth," and "free enterprise," and "lower taxes," and "less spending," and of course "smaller government." These candidates have spent most of their time informing voters about everything that they’re against, but they haven’t spent much time explaining to voters what they support. Some may argue that Republicans don’t have a coherent narrative for a policy agenda because they do not have one. However, the real reason they don’t have a coherent narrative might be because they do have an agenda, and the policy ideas that Republicans are advocating are to simply double down on the failed economic policies that lead to the Great Recession.

This year Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) introduced the Economic Freedom Act of 2010, which among other things would eliminate the tax on the capital gains of individuals and corporations; reduce the maximum corporate income tax rate to 12.5%; allow a permanent and unlimited expensing allowance for depreciable business assets; and reduce payroll tax rates for employers, employees, and self-employed individuals in 2010, permanently repeals the estate taxes. According to an analysis by the Center for American Progress, what this proposed legislation amounts to is a $10 trillion giveaway to corporations and placing a further burden on working and middle class Americans. For all of the Congressional Republicans talk about budget deficits, this legislation would add $7 trillion in deficits over the next ten years. When you consider Republican support for extending the Bush Administration 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, the Republican economic agenda would add $10 trillion to the deficit. How does the legislation proposed to pay for these policies? By repealing TARP and using the remaining stimulus funds. However, that would only pay for about 5% of the cost of the legislation, which disproportionately benefits the wealthy.  The average middle-class taxpayer would receive a tax cut of $467, compared to the average taxpayer in the richest 1% receives a tax cut of $157,500.

Then there is the Roadmap for America's Future Act of 2010, which was introduced this year by Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI). While Congressman Jordan’s legislation would simply disproportionately benefit the wealthiest of Americans and add trillions of dollars to the budget deficits, Congressman Ryan’s legislation would also increase the tax burdens on the work and middle class and make significant cuts to the social safety net. Basically not only does Ryan want to dismantle the policies that kept the Great Recession from turning into the Great Depression, he wants to dismantle the policies that where created because of the Great Depression to protect the most vulnerable of Americans. According to an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Roadmap would reduce by half the taxes of the richest 1% of Americans and the tax cuts would increase the further up the income ladder you climb. The richest 1/10 of 1% of Americans (whose incomes exceed $2.9 million a year) would receive an average tax cut of $1.7 million a year. How would these massive tax cuts be offset? By taxing working and middle class Americans. A new consumption tax on most goods and services, and this would shift the tax burdens so considerably from the upper class to the middle class that people with incomes over $1 million would face much lower effective tax rates than middle-income families would. When you consider that the Roadmap makes drastic changes to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, discontinue the Children's Health Insurance Program, radically reduce federal spending, the picture becomes clear that Ryan’s plan is a roadmap to the Gilded Age.

There is a Republican public policy agenda. However radical this agenda is, it is also a long term policy agenda. Ezra Kline summarizes Congressman Ryan’s economic agenda:

"According to [Ryan] businesses are frozen because the bills passed in the past year, such as health-care reform and financial regulation, were bad, and the bills not passed in the past year, like deficit reduction and tax reform, have left businesses confused about what'll happen in the coming years...But [Ryan’s] solutions didn't seem like they would increase certainty very much. He wanted to repeal and replace both the financial regulation and the health-care reform bills...But in practice, repeal would take a long time, building something new would take a long time, passing it would take a long time, and then waiting for the regulators to do whatever they needed to do with it would take a long time. Same goes for deficit reduction and tax reform. You might be able to pass better bills, but you can't pass them quickly, and there are no assurances as to what they'll look like when you're finished. If there's uncertainty when some of the laws are certain, there'll be even more of it when they become uncertain again. Businesses can't plan based on legislation that hasn't passed."

This is then the crux of the policy argument: Republicans have no economic policy ideas for the short term economic problems. No doubt about it Republicans have economic policy ideas, but they are exclusively focused on long term economic problems. The Republican Party is attempting to recapture the success of Newt Gingrich’s Contract with American, while appeasing the Tea Party and their Contract from America, and creative a Roadmap for America’s future that leads to the dismantling of the social safety net. While it is always difficult to get the voters interested in policy, and it is impossible to prove the negative (that Democrat economic policies prevented a second Great Depression), forcing Congressional Republicans to address their policy agenda runs counter to the Republican political strategy. The roadmap to Democrat electoral success runs through the Republican policy agenda.

Political and Social Thought...
to the Left of College Station

Originally posted to Left of Aggieland on Tue Aug 03, 2010 at 07:18 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It's a Base Election, Their Base Aren't Idea (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Ckntfld, revgerry, DWG, LiberalTexan, Vtdblue

    voters.

    They haven't had the least interest in moderates and idea voters since Obama swore in. Clearly they haven't and still don't expect such voters to be significant in November.

    Their base is identity motivated. So they've been whipping up the identity themes and ignoring everything else.

    My hypothesis here is that they're not concealing their ideas, they're not bothering with any.

    The 2 year Presidential race begins Jan 2, and then we'll see a shift of the xenophobia and racism back to the pulpit and hate radio channels while they return their sober adults with policy ideas to the mainstream to appeal to the moderates they expect in 2012.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Tue Aug 03, 2010 at 07:24:51 PM PDT

    •  In complete agreement. Any putative "ideas" are (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Ckntfld, LiberalTexan

      crude and unsupported by anything other than mystical thinking and lies. It's all about protecting Republicans from the scary "mud people," commie liberals, castrating feminazis, anybody from another culture, etc., etc.  I.e., identity politics, as you rightly assert.

      [Conservatives are] engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; ...the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. JK Galbrai

      by Vtdblue on Tue Aug 03, 2010 at 08:08:24 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  And what ideas they do have (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Ckntfld, revgerry, LiberalTexan, Vtdblue

    would permanently destroy opportunity for most Americans and our democracy. The Economic Freedom Act is all out assault on lower and middle income people in this country, further concentrating wealth into a smaller fraction of our society, gutting government services, and transferring more jobs and wealth to other countries. These are dangerous people.

    Tea Party = Racist, Rapacious Republicans

    by DWG on Tue Aug 03, 2010 at 07:49:40 PM PDT

  •  Politics of DISTRACTION- "SB1070," "sharia law", (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    LiberalTexan, Vtdblue

    Mosque at 911, ACORN, Sherrod, Prop 8, on and on and on -

    .....all to obscure this abysmally inhumane agenda.

    Let's waste as few pixels as possible fighting the false wars and spend as much energy as possible educating about these issues.

    And let's support American small business, American manufacturing, American unions, American exports, American infrastructure,American education,  American green energy, American infrastructure, American Internet for all, tax cuts for those making under $200,00 (the day after we let the Bush tax cuts expire).

    basta!

    Let's break our dependence on foreign goods and our multinational masters. May Peace Prevail

    by revgerry on Tue Aug 03, 2010 at 07:58:16 PM PDT

  •  They actually want to reduce payroll taxes? (0+ / 0-)

    Excellent idea, I desperately need a bigger paycheck.

  •  Thanks for the Rescue (0+ / 0-)

    We needed to be reminded that the Republican Party has become the party of Newt Gringrich.  He is not an honorable man.  Anyone who goes through a series of wives and divorces one who is sick with cancer has a problem with women in general.  Once the 14th Amendement nonsense plays out, they still have the amendment enfranchising women.  That one has been on the books for only 90 years.

    Don't look back, something may be gaining on you. - L. "Satchel" Paige

    by arlene on Thu Aug 05, 2010 at 04:22:08 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site