Skip to main content

I happened to catch part of NPR's Friday All Things Considered political commentary segment, this week putting Michelle Bernard up with E. J. Dionne.

Ms. Bernard got to her programmed talking point right away: If a rich guy suddenly has to pay more taxes if the Bush Tax Cuts for the Fabulously Wealthy (TM) expire, some poor slob at the low end of the totem pole will get axed. She made that point twice, just in case some old fashioned static distracted you from the fear bait.

That is her basic argument: Keep the tax cuts in place or some poor slob will lose his job.

Of course E. J. was too busy with his own talking points to actually counter this bunk.

I have my own counter argument, in case you are interested...

So, lets say you are a big bidnessman, getting a really big taxable personal income for all of your 'work', and the tax cuts DO expire. Are you going to:

(1) Keep the same personal income, but let Obama take a lot more of it to pay for his evil socialist plan?
Your gross income has not changed, so the company you 'work' for has not been affected.

(2) Raise your income (or profit taking) (gross it up), so you have the same take home pay, because Obama is taking so much more for his evil socialist plan. Your company willingly does this (it has to, you own it), but now has less money to pay the 'little guy', so he has to go. This might hurt the company just a little bit, but since he does so much less 'work' than you do (confirmed by your whopping income), he will hardly be missed. Possible side benefit: He joins a Tea Party because he is so pissed off about losing a job just because Obama needs more money for his evil socialist plan.

(3) Lower your take home income, making sure that Obama does not get any more money for his evil socialist plan than he does now, since there will be a higher tax rate on proportionally less money. (Sorry Sarah P, I just used a mathematical equation with TWO variables. I know how much that hurts the ol' noggin'.) This is known as 'starving the beast'. Now your company has more money to spend on little guys, so you actually hire another one (or ten), make more product, make more profits, make more money in the long run. Wow! That sounds really SOCIALIST!

I have to sort of wonder whether Ms. Bernard, if she took the time to think about it, would think that option (1) is most probable. But that one does not cause the company to change employment, so it is not SCARY enough to frighten people into voting Republican.

Ms. Bernard works for the "Independent Women's Forum". (Independent of what? Reality?).

This cute little "forum" has "scholar directors" like Lynne (my husband really is human) Cheney, Lawrence (Mr. Supply Side) Kudlow (he is a Distinguished Scholar, ya know), and Wendy Lee Gramm (Ronald Reagan called her his favorite economist). I'm guessing there might be some kind of agenda going on here.

OK, I am not scared that taxing really rich people is going to cost poor peeps their jobs. You?

Originally posted to FightersFate on Sat Aug 07, 2010 at 07:04 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site