Skip to main content

by Catherine Traywick, Media Consortium blogger

After signing a controversial $600 million border security bill last week, President Barack Obama is drawing fire from immigration reform advocates and anti-immigrant conservatives alike. While the former argue that the new security measures are a step backwards for comprehensive immigration reform, the latter say the bill does too little to secure our borders.

Arizona's SB 1070 was a challenge to the federal government's ability to resolve the immigration issue, and the Obama administration took a strong stood against it. The border security bill is almost certainly a demonstration of the administration's might. But for what, and at whose expense?

The further right the president moves on immigration, the more absurd the opposition's tactics become. Anti-immigration activists are now directing their ire towards the unborn children of immigrants. Meanwhile, immigration activists in Arizona are butting heads with an increasingly vocal gang of Tea Party members and have yet to see any positive change as a result of the federal lawsuit.

Obama gets an F

At The American Prospect, Adam Serwer argues that Obama’s immigration policies have failed the reform movement, and that they have also failed to bring anti-immigrant conservatives into the fold:

...While President Obama talks like an immigration moderate, in practice his actions are those of an unapologetic immigration hawk who has tightened border security without fulfilling his promise of immigration reform. [...] On matters of border security, the administration is doing just about everything a Republican might do in his place, which means that Republicans have had to go to even greater extremes just to provide an excuse for not going along.

The extremist crusade against the 14th amendment, which grants automatic citizenship to anyone born in the U.S., is just one example of  the lengths to which some conservatives will go to defy an administration whose immigration policies are already remarkably conservative.

Exposing the myth of the "anchor baby"

True to form, those calling for a repeal of the 14th amendment are now outdoing one another in an effort to appear even more extremely anti-immigrant. This week’s "terror baby" threat has eclipsed last week’s "anchor baby" threat, as some conservatives claim that pregnant immigrants are not only coming to the U.S. to give birth, but to raise their American babies as terrorists.

Robin Templeton of GritTv and Seth Hoy of AlterNet jumped on the issue this week. Both argue that, in far too many cases, the citizenship of an immigrant’s children has little bearing on whether or not she stays in the country, let alone become a U.S. citizen.

Templeton drives the point home by citing the case of Fatoumata Gassama, mother of six U.S. citizens, who fled Senegal to escape genital mutilation and is now faced with deportation. If deported, Templeton writes, "She will have no choice but to return with her children...including her 4 daughters, who would almost certainly be subjected to the same torture from which their mother sought refuge in the United States."

The "anchor baby" threat is just the latest in a long list of sensational and unfounded claims put forth to demonize immigrants. According to the anti-immigrant contingent, we are at risk of losing jobs to immigrants, losing social services to immigrants, and even being criminally victimized by immigrants. Propagating such baseless misinformation is a common tactic, as most may remember from the health care reform debates.

Checking in on Arizona

Meanwhile in the nation’s anti-immigrant epicenter, Arizona, Tea Partiers are enjoying their heyday, and immigrants’ rights activists have yet to see any positive change resulting from the federal lawsuit against SB 1070.

As Naima Ramos-Chapman reports at Colorlines, gun-toting tea party activists kicked off the week with a border rally headlined by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who advertised some of his own immigration solutions including "a pre-emptive strike to hunt down immigrants on the Mexican side of the border."

Arpaio’s apparent disregard for Mexico's sovereignty notwithstanding, his anti-immigrant zeal is nothing new. As Aura Bogado reports for Mother Jones, the sheriff tormented immigrants for years before SB 1070 became a hot topic, indiscriminately rounding up people of color and jailing them under such poor conditions that many have left prison severely injured, while others have died.

On top of that, federal prosecutions of immigrants in Arizona are at a record high this year. According to Elise Foley at the Washington Independent, newly released data shows that immigration cases made up 84.5 percent of prosecutions in Arizona.

That's good news, no doubt, to Arpaio. Maricopa county ranks among the highest in its prosecutions of non-criminal immigrants. Such findings are harder for reform advocates to swallow, particularly in light of Obama's repeated assurances that his immigration measures primarily target criminals. The divide between Obama's promises and the reality of the situation on the ground is glaring, and anti-immigrant forces know it.

In Arizona, for instance, both the state legislature and Governor Jan Brewer remain defiant even in the face of the federal lawsuit against SB 1070 (which itself challenged the president's resolve on immigration reform), and have since passed or introduced other anti-immigrant bills, in addition to several currently in the works—Nicole Guidotti-Hernandez atMs. has a good breakdown of recently passed and pending anti-immigrant legislation in Arizona.

Curbing Arizona's reach

But while numerous states have come out in support of SB 1070, many copy-cat bills have already failed in other states. Many more are likely to meet the same end.

Suman Raghunathan at YES! Magazine suggests that states are broadly rejecting Arizona—thereby demonstrating that the intense anti-immigrant sentiment currently dominating the media belongs to only a small faction of extremists. Raghunathan furthermore argues that it is actually the anti-immigrant movement that is failing.

Given the highly-criticized events at the federal level, such as the signing of the new border security bill and the expansion of the Secure Communities program, Raghunathan's position is optimistic, to say the least. But maybe, at this point in the game, the immigration reform camp needs a little optimism.

Originally posted to The Media Consortium on Thu Aug 19, 2010 at 08:34 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  border security is not good a good thing? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Southside

    immigration reform is complex the way i see it:

    1.  Border security-the US is a sovereign country.  If we don't secure the border than all of the other aspects won't matter.
    1. Stop employers from exploiting undocumented workers.
    1.  Dealing with undocumented people that are here now.  "path to citizenship.
  •  To answer the question in your title (0+ / 0-)

    no.  Not an A perhaps, but not an F either.  Hopefully Congress will be willing to take up reform after the elections.

  •  Another failed expediency (0+ / 0-)

    From Big O.  Yes, it's true that he has deported more people since he took office than in a comparable period before. Yes it's true that Luis Gutierrez is fuming about it.

    The president is charged with upholding the law, whether he likes it or not.

    It's also true that his administration took Arizona to court over their whacked-out immigration law, which was not an expediency, since his polling numbers have suffered grievously for it.

    Because it was the right thing to do.

    It's also true that his administration is trying to bring that maniac Arpaio down.

    Because it's the right thing to do.

    I'll give him at least a C.

    It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness - Eleanor Roosevelt

    by Fish in Illinois on Thu Aug 19, 2010 at 09:15:43 AM PDT

  •  I guess overpopulation of the USA doesn't matter. (0+ / 0-)

    Let's not worry about global warming and peak oil and all that.  We need to have bleeding hearts over the immigrants even though that means we won't have a world to live in anymore.

    •  well that was just a shade less than retarded (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Sentido, fredlonsdale

      solving the immigration issue, or at least proving that the Democratic Party is concerned about getting it right, would go a long way towards electoral victories now and in the future.  Having concern about immigrants, legal and otherwise, has absolutely nothing to do with the environment.  If you are alluding to the notion that immig. reform hasn't moved forward b/c of attention given to energy policy, that might hold some water, but is not a convincing answer anyway.

      Once again, Obama's manic drive to find a "bipartisan" solution to a very one-sided issue is satisfying no one and costing him more political capital.  When is he gonna learn to stop doing this crap?  The only side the Democratic Party should be taking on this issue is dealing with the status of immigrants, not "secure the border" which is R-talk for "we be hatin' on the brown-colored folk".....divide and conquer, divide and conquer, rinse, repeat ad nauseum....

    •  It has nothing to do with overpopulation. (0+ / 0-)

      The USA is near the bottom of the world in population density. Of course, global warming and peak oil don't have anything to do with immigration.

      And you say that with immigrants... we won't have a world anymore???? Are you really suggesting we kick them off the planet?

      This issue is about racism, not about the environment.

      •  People are wrecking the environment (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        scpato

        NO?

        So the more people the worse our environment.  

        Try to make it a racism issue all you want, but it is an environment issue and quality of life issue for USA citizens.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site