Skip to main content

I'm not surprised, although outraged, by Alan Simpson's remarks.  Obviously his language was crude, intemperate, and sexist, but even worse is the obvious hostility to Social Security, the most successful social program in history; one that hundreds of millions of American workers are currently relying on, or will rely on in the future, for a retirement with dignity.

I've written President Obama about my concerns.  The text of my letter follows below.  I urge everyone who reads this to send a similar message. Obama needs to hear us -- hands off our Social Security.  We can't allow concerns about structural deficits, caused largely by Bush's risky tax cuts, to serve as an excuse to gut our Social Security benefits.

And if you like what I wrote -- feel free to borrow.  No pride of authorship, I just want Obama to be reminded how his base feels about Social Security.

Here's the text of the email I sent this morning:

I, like millions of other Americans, am outraged by Alan Simpson's ridiculous comment that Social Security is a "milkcow with 310 million tits."

No, I'm not particularly offended by the intemperate language he used, though the fact that he thought it appropriate to put such language in a written response to a concerned member of the public certainly calls his judgment into question.

I'm much more concerned about the substance of Mr. Simpson's remark.  It is outrageous.  American workers pay into Social Security for their entire life, so that they can have a decent retirement when they become too old to work.  We are rightly concerned that your deficit commission is going to use our current economic problems as a pretext for cutting our Social Security benefits, which we have earned.  How can that be compared to "sucking at a tit?" American workers are not lazy bums waiting for a handout from Social Security, they are hard workers who have willingly paid into the program in exchange for the right to retire with a modest income.  The program provides exactly what it says -- security.  How dare Alan Simpson, a rich, privileged conservative elitist hack, attack ordinary working Americans like that!

And this brings us to a bigger problem with your deficit commission.  Simpson, like a lot of other wealthy elitist Republicans, hates Social Security.  Indeed, they've been looking for ways to undermine and gut the program since the day it was passed.  Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit.  In fact, its surplus has been reducing (disguising) the amount of the deficit for years.  There's no emergency -- at worst, with very conservative assumptions, the projection is that full benefits will be available for the next 27 years.  Surely that isn't an emergency, and doesn't require that hasty decisions be made in the middle of an economic crisis.  Why doesn't Mr. Simpson (and the rest of the commission members) focus on reducing the structural deficit (caused largely by Bush's reckless tax cuts) rather than hurting the American middle class?

Finally, a word of warning on politics: If you buy into this Social Security hysteria, and support the benefit cuts Simpson and his ilk are probably going to propose, that's the end of the Democratic Party for a generation.  That's not a threat, just an observation.  Your base will abandon the Democratic Party in droves.  Strong support for Social Security is the essence of being a Democrat; if that goes, all's lost.

Originally posted to RenMin on Thu Aug 26, 2010 at 08:33 AM PDT.


President Obama . . .

46%23 votes
4%2 votes
18%9 votes
2%1 votes
2%1 votes
8%4 votes
8%4 votes
10%5 votes

| 49 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site