Skip to main content


Even as the United States has been borrowing trillions to pursue its wars in the Middle East, the government of Iraq has posted a tidy surplus, according to a new Government Accountability Office report.

The report makes a direct link between U.S. government spending -- including $642 billion on U.S. military operations there and $24 billion for training and equipping the Iraqi security forces -- and Iraq's cumulative surplus of $52.1 billion through the end of 2009.

For comparison purposes, Iraq's annual gross domestic product is $65.8 billion. Meanwhile, the U.S. national debt has soared from $6.4 trillion to $13.4 trillion since former president George W. Bush invaded Iraq and decided to borrow the money for wars and slash taxes.

In what is sure to be great news for John McCain, the Iraqi economy is recovering quite nicely.  

The GAO Report released today highlights the solvency of Iraq's Central Bank, even as the Iraq government prepares to ask the United States for an extra $2 billion in assistance for training and equipping the Iraqi military and police force.

This comes on the heels of a report that the Saudi government is preparing to import $60 billion in American-made military equipment, including Boeing F-15 fighters manufactured by American-based United Technologies.

It's been a very good Eid Al-Fitr for the Saudis, apparently.

The previously disclosed arms package is believed to be the largest in U.S. history, the official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told reporters today. Once the proposal has been formally submitted to the House and Senate foreign affairs committees, Congress has 30 days to reject the package.

The package includes 84 new F-15s and upgrades to 70 more in the Saudi inventory at a cost of $30 billion, and helicopter sales totaling about $30 billion that include spare parts, training simulators, long-term logistics support and some munitions. It also includes versions of Chicago-based Boeing’s satellite-guided Joint Direct Attack Munition, which the Saudis first bought in 2008.

The Saudis would buy about 72 UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters, 70 AH-64D Longbow Apaches and 36 AH-6 Little Bird choppers, the official said. The Longbow is the U.S. Army’s premier anti-tank helicopter, capable of firing laser-guided or all-weather radar- guided air-to-ground Hellfire missiles. The Saudi package includes only laser-guided versions.

So, while Senate Republicans tell us that we can't afford to pay unemployment benefits for the 9.6% of Americans who are currently jobless, it appears that our allies in the Middle East are doing very well.

But as Froomkin reminds us, economists Joe Stiglitz and Linda Blimes estimate that the costs of the Iraq War (direct, indirect, and ongoing costs) are going to be around $3 trillion, despite Bush administration claims that the war effort would cost only around $50-60 billion.

The lessons we take from this information will vary depending on your views of military spending in general.  For me, the neoconservative escapades over the past decade represent an utter failure of both fiscal discipline and foreign policy.  And while there is hollow comfort in knowing that the Saudis are buying our military equipment, it's troubling that Republicans who claim to value "national security" continue to oppose policies that will improve our economic security.

We've got 7 weeks before Election Day.

Time to get to work.

Originally posted to Benintn on Mon Sep 13, 2010 at 08:11 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kurt, divineorder, Betty Pinson

    15 million voters in 50 days. Sign up at OFA today.

    by Benintn on Mon Sep 13, 2010 at 08:11:09 PM PDT

  •  The war and false housing prices.... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    ...WAS our economy. Looks like the fasting is over in Saudi Arabia for the royal family and its back to filling out those voluminous robes.

    British Petroleum: I think that means it's foreign oil.

    by Bensdad on Mon Sep 13, 2010 at 08:36:10 PM PDT

  •  The escapades you speak of were a big fat (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:



    How Much "Success" Can Afghans Stand?

    Sunday 12 September 2010

    by: Nick Turse  |  TomDispatch | News Analysis

    Unlike victory, success turns out to be a slippery term. As the United States approaches the tenth anniversary of the invasion of Afghanistan, pundits have been chewing over just what "success" in Afghanistan might mean for Washington. What success might mean for ordinary Afghans hasn’t, however, been a major topic of conversation, even though U.S. officials have regularly promised them far better lives and trumpeted American efforts to reconstruct that war-torn land.

    Between 2001 and 2009, according to the Afghan government, the country has received $36 billion in grants and loans from donor nations, with the United States disbursing some $23 billion of it. U.S. taxpayers have anted up another $338 billion to fund the war and occupation. Yet from poverty indexes to risk-of-rape assessments, from childhood mortality figures to drug-use stats, just about every available measure of Afghan wellbeing paints a grim picture of a country in a persistent state of humanitarian crisis, often involving reconstruction and military failures on an epic scale. Pick a measurement affecting ordinary Afghans and the record since November 2001 when Kabul fell to Allied forces is likely to show stagnation or setbacks and, almost invariably, suffering.

    Almost a decade after the U.S. invasion, life for Afghan civilians is not a subject Americans care much about and so, not surprisingly, it plays little role in Washington's discussions of "success." Have a significant number of Afghans found the years of occupation and war "successful"? Has there been a payoff in everyday life for the indignities of the American years -- the cars stopped or sometimes shot up at road checkpoints, the American patrols trooping through fields and searching homes, the terrifying night raids, the imprisonments without trial, or the way so many Afghans continue to be treated like foreigners, if not criminal suspects, in their own country?

    For years, American leaders have hailed the way Afghans are supposedly benefiting from the U.S. role in their country. But are they?

  •  Weird that the US is so.... (0+ / 0-)

    ...complacent about arming Saudi Arabia to the teeth when their only "enemy" in the area is our equally beweaponed buddy Israel. Being part of a nation that's a wholesale supplier of death implements... doesn't really fill me with American pride.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site