Skip to main content

A while back, someone answered one of my posts with the comment that no one was worrying about Republicans rigging elections in 2010.

My thoughts then were (1) They certainly have done that since 2002, and (2) Maybe they will not bother to this time.

Then I read the post about documented evidence to prevent minorities and college students from voting in Wisconsin. What is planned as a "caging" operation. Its illegal, but it works long enough to decide elections.

Somewhere I have many notes on all of this. Let me just summarize from memory.

Up through 2002, the main method of rigging elections was to change cards in electronic voting machines. Georgia provided the best example, where the cards were switched in southern Georgia, winning the governor's chair and a senate seat for Max Clellan.

In 2002, the Florida GOP commissioned a computer expert to develop a program that would rig outcomes by hacking programs used to tabulate county returns. Apparently that program was ready by 2004.

This was widely used in 2004. That is why there  were unheard-of discrepancies between exit poll findings and exact findings. There are all sorts of statistical studies that show that the results of the two always have a very high correlation. The best study was done in Utah, where there are few Democrats.

Oddly, the Ohio Libertarians unsuccessfully asked for a recount. The Kerry people did nothing.

At the time, I went through all the returns in the county where the head of the Ohio Libertarians resided and found many discrepancies.  The head of the Ohio Libertarians probably favored Bush over Kerry but he was an honest man who wanted to keep the system pure.

The states developed post-election sampling techniques to unconver irregularities.  But by 2008, the machine manufacturers had developed methbods to game the post election checks. They sent people around to the counties with fake data to feed the examiners. In Hocking County, Ohio, an honest county employee was fired for blowing the whistle.

As many readers know, Karl Rove's chief consultant on voting machines died in a strange plane crash some months later. People were asking him too many questions.

A friend, who just died, spent the last nine years studying election fraud. He was a trained statistician and had belonged to the national organization for voter registrars. He was ultimately ejected for asking too many questions. The new electronic voting machines made counting so much easier that they may just not have wanted to go back to the old ways.

A final point-- The programs sending and collecting and tabulating electronic voting machine data are all proprietqary and cannot be examined by public authorities. The largest manufacturers have ties to the GOP.

Originally posted to ShermanDeBrosse on Mon Sep 20, 2010 at 05:54 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site