Skip to main content

Here's why.

If I lived in Nevada and had the vote, even though Sharron Angle is beyond nuts, I'd vote for her. Better nuts than this disgusting, cynical, partisan Washington kabuki dance, when people's lives and dignity are at stake.

This was in response to Harry Reid's maneuvering with the defense authorization bill. Read it again.

If I lived in Nevada and had the vote, even though Sharron Angle is beyond nuts, I'd vote for her. Better nuts than this disgusting, cynical, partisan Washington kabuki dance, when people's lives and dignity are at stake.

From Andrew Sullivan, this is extraordinarily misguided outrage. It's like he suddenly felt the need to post the stupidest opinion that popped into his mind.

The villains in his narrative are wrong. The villains were the Republicans and the Arkansas Democrats who decided to stand against two fantastic provisions that a majority of Americans support:

According to polling, 70 percent of Americans support the DREAM Act and 75 percent of Americans support fully repealing DADT. The 42 senators who filibustered the bill, on the other hand, represent only 36 percent of the American population. Thanks to senate procedure, a small minority can easily obstruct the will of the vast majority of the public.

Granted, I'm not in love with Harry Reid—and that seems to be the Kos majority opinion—but my disapproval of him isn't at the expense of my sanity. I know who the villains are: Republicans who don't want to see social progress and will block this so Democrats don't have certain victories leading up to November. When not a single Republican votes for this bill, apparently the ire should be directed at Harry Reid? And voting for Sharron Angle in retribution—the candidate who said she'd refuse campaign money from campaigns that support gay rights (though not really following through), the candidate who wants to make gay adoption illegal and allow clergy to support candidates, the candidate who voted against a state ENDA, a bill to stop harassment in schools, and a bill to end discrimination in public accommodations—is supposed to teach US WHAT? That you're wholly misguided? The thought process of voting Republican to express disapproval with a far saner Democrat is rendered more ridiculous by his appeal to human dignity and human lives. Because when I think about improving the stakes of human lives and dignity... I think Sharron Angle.

I remember this post well, which was made shortly after McCain took on Palin:

Yes, McCain made a decision that revealed many appalling things about him. In the end, his final concern is not national security. No one who cares about national security would pick as vice-president someone who knows nothing about it as his replacement. No one who cares about this country's safety would gamble the security of the world on a total unknown because she polled well with the Christianist base. No person who truly believed that the surge was integral to this country's national security would pick as his veep candidate a woman who, so far as we can tell anything, opposed it at the time.

McCain has demonstrated in the last two months that he does not have the character to be president of the United States. And that is why it is more important than ever to ensure that Barack Obama is the next president. The alternative is now unthinkable. And McCain - no one else - has proved it.

Allow me to retort with perspective.

No one who cares about gay rights would vote for Sharron Angle to be the next Senator of Nevada. No one who cares about unfucking our disgusting, cynical, partisan Washington kabuki dance would vote for someone whose mission is to serve is an accelerant for this problem. No one who cares about the lives and dignity of American citizens would vote for a Republican in a petty attempt to express disapproval with a far saner candidate. Period.

Edit: HT to Mike S for more info on Angle's anti-gay stances.

Originally posted to The Erratic Synapse on Wed Sep 22, 2010 at 04:41 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site