Skip to main content

Why do viewers buy the idea that Joan didn’t "go through with it"?  The answer lies in our preconceived notions about what happens in clinic waiting rooms.

Written by Sarah Seltzer for - News, commentary and community for reproductive health and justice. This diary is cross-posted; commenters wishing to engage directly with the author should do so at the original post.


Joan Harris, formerly Holloway, office manager and femme fatale supreme at Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce, had an abortion on this season’s "Mad Men." Or at least that’s what I thought when I saw the episode, although the action was shot in a somewhat cryptic way. Joan entered the illegal doctor’s office and sat in the waiting room. Sitting on those sterile couches, she had a talk with a despondent mother whose teenage daughter was also having an abortion. Joan--who we know has already had two abortions in the past--pretended that she, too, was there for a daughter and not herself. Viewers assumed that "fifteen," the age she gave for her fictional daughter, was the number of years since her first abortion--or maybe she just wanted to make the other woman feel better.

Then Joan went home on the train looking serious. She told her paramour Roger the next day that they "avoided a tragedy" and "life goes on." Her behavior then changed during the subsequent episodes, and she refused to sleep with Roger again, as though she had a big "I’m too old for this" epiphany.

This all made sense to me in the context of Joan having an abortion. But when I logged on to the internet the conspiracy theories were everywhere,  flooding the comment threads of almost every single blogand message board discussing the episode. There was even a "did she or didn’t she?"poll at Slate.  Joan couldn’t have gone through with it, viewers averred. She had a moment of regret at the "clinic" and she is secretly carrying Roger’s baby, which she will pass off as being the spawn of her creepy rapist husband, Greg, who is currently serving a tour in Vietnam--even though she told Roger the timing wouldn’t work. Or she’ll move away and start a plucky new life for herself as a single mom, a la much-referenced soap opera "Peyton Place."

I was inspired by this interpretation to reevaluate the episode in my mind--the ambiguity of Joan’s face on the train home, the oblique mention of "avoiding a tragedy." Suddenly, knowing how showrunner Matt Weiner loves to tease his audience and play with ambiguity, I began to doubt my own convictions.

And it turned out, when the finale aired earlier tonight, that I was indeed wrong. Joan phoned her husband in Vietnam and indicated during her conversation that she was carrying his child, to giggles on both ends.

In the end, though, this isn’t so much about exactly what Joan did or didn’t do as it is about the assumptions we’ve been fed by the media surrounding women, pregnancy and abortion, assumptions that Weiner is very much playing with as we watch the show. We are not used to women going into abortion clinics and quietly, clinically even, getting the procedure. We are used to the clinic waiting room being a place of agonizing decision making, not of determined resolution. We--even pro-choicers--are deeply accustomed to the rhetoric of regret and guilt and the association of  abortion being "unnatural" for a woman who wants to be a mother. But do all those assumptions and ingrained images actually fit Joan’s story, or is Weiner manipulating our modern sensibilities for a sensationalist storyline?

Bloggger "Meowser" at fan-blog Basket of Kisses summarized the major objections to this potential plotline.

Now, I know it’s kind of an unusual happenstance for a major character on television or in a movie to actually voluntarily end a pregnancy — in fact, it’s kind of like a third rail, you see people killing themselves and people who are already born... but abortion, never ever ever — but I’m just not able to wrap my head around this particular conclusion. It just doesn’t seem to be a very Joan-like thing to do; the amount and extent of fibbing that would have to take place would make Don look like an amateur, and that’s not Joan’s style.

Exactly. "Mad Men" is known for being excruciatingly period-specific. Joan was not at a modern-day abortion clinic and she was not privy to a modern-day abortion debate. She had followed a specific plan which involved breaking the law and risking arrest--which speaks to a strong determination to begin with. There were no protesters and no one to tell her what she did was immoral. Sure, by the standards of her time she was a "loose woman" but there was no pro-life movement calling women selfish babykillers.  The "tragedy" that’s been avoided in the terms of the time could also have been the alternate consequences of keeping the baby: a pair of divorces, for instance, or social ostracism.

When viewers talk about Joan’s decision, they focus on her regret over her "biological clock" and her anguish over having had so many abortions. It’s true, we certainly know from her own behavior that she wants to have a perfect white picket fence family with a Doctor husband--so much so that she stays with him and gets married even after he rapes her. At the same time, however, Joan’s interest in being a mother seems to stem as much from a desire to conform to society’s prescribed path as some sort of innate maternal quality or instinct.

And that’s where the plotline around Joan's pregnancy falls apart--her character. She is obsessed with outward appearance, with propriety. She shuns Peggy Olsen for breaking the mold of women in the office by pursuing a job as a copywriter. She prides herself on carefulness and subtlety, on neatness and discretion. Would she really risk the public humiliation of a rumored out-of-wedlock pregnancy? The risk of having to take time off from work with her family situation so precarious? But it turns out that her desire to "have it all" reached such desperate soap-opera levels that she's willing to take that gamble.

Finally, this "secret pregnancy" plotline has flown against the grain of the show and shows a departure from his previous subtlety. "Mad Men" telegraphed the fact that Peggy was pregnant when she herself didn’t know it--the show’s creators embrace this kind of dramatic irony. We know the character’s secrets, while the other characters do not. For instance, there was a recent spate of shots of Don Draper and his girlfriend Faye Miller--with and Megan the secretary he slept with floating in the background or standing in between them. As for Joan's plan to pass off Roger's baby as her husband's, we ought to have gotten at least a few more clues about it. The show, which posits itself as more sophisticated and a standout from the pack, has cheapened itself with a twist right out of a daytime talk show.

If, as I wrongly hypothesized, Joan "went through with it," the tragedy in Joan’s story wouldn't have been that she lost her "last chance" to be a mother (another trope we’re accustomed to). It’s that she has to hide every indelicate burst of passion and talent she has under a veneer of in-control femininity. The abortion would have been part of a story arc for Joan, but not a "hidden pregnancy" story. It’s about a woman who realizes she has strained every last muscle fighting between her actual desires and her overarching belief in conformity and maintaining appearances. It’s realistic for her character, the time period, and the plot for Joan to have had the abortion.
The show’s writers and the many viewers who think "she didn’t go through with it" are imagining a modern-day conception of abortion fueled by iffy anti-choice tropes found in movies like "Juno" or shows like "The Secret Life of the American Teenager."  It's too bad that in this instance "Mad Men" didn't prove itself better than such fare.

What do you think, RHRC readers, based on your viewing this season?</div>


Originally posted to RH Reality Check on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 07:06 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I didn't have a problem with it (4+ / 0-)

    Claiming that Mad Men is somehow anti-abortion is a huge stretch. Joan has had two abortions, and she's never been made out as some she-devil because of it. The choice to keep her child is not out of character for Joan, who is following the path she believes society mandates for her: wife and mother. She doesn't exactly shun Peggy, as the article asserts, but she doesn't really believe that is a path that is possible for her. Notice how she is not overly excited or ambitious about the promotion she receives, even if it is only a title.

    What she'll do with Sterling remains to be seen. The author seems to think that this is out of characters, since it's going to require a massive web of lies. I disagree that Joan believes this, though it may turn out this way. I think it's likely, however, that she'll tell Roger "I kept the baby, deal with it." That leaves her husband, which is a open problem. But the ugly truth is that Joan is hoping that her husband dies in Vietnam. This would rid her of the problem of an abusive relationship and an illegitimate child, while still being on the "approved path" (Joan would now be a grieving widow, not a single mother, whore, or divorcee).

    Proud supporter of nuclear power!

    by zegota on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 07:16:23 AM PDT

    •  I forgot to mention: (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Pris from LA, klompendanser

      It should be noted that the writing surrounding Joan gets a lot of grief because she's such a magnificent character and actress. Thus any problem is not a character flaw or mistake, but "bad writing." I've seen this happen multiple times with Joan, actually. She's not perfect. She's heavily flawed, like the rest of the characters on the show.

      Proud supporter of nuclear power!

      by zegota on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 07:19:22 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Did a character relinquish a child for adoption (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    annrose, Pris from LA, melpomene1

    in the first season of "Mad Men"?  I've never watched the show, don't even know when it's on, but my daughter loves it, being in advertising herself.

    I've been a clinic escort in the past.  In my experience, people don't make those decisions in the waiting room of the clinic.  If they decide to carry the pregnancy to term, they don't go near the clinic in the first place.

    Yes, I'm het, but I'm NOT a Mad Hetter!

    by Diana in NoVa on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 07:19:41 AM PDT

  •  Mad Men is generally (0+ / 0-)

    correct on the 60's but you couldn't make a phone call to the states like the Doc did when I was there.

    It's not a "pledge for America" it is a "pledge for American Corporations."

    by regis on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 08:14:15 AM PDT

  •  As a former soap opera viewer, I never (0+ / 0-)

    thought she went through with it.  It's a soapy element.  I also saw it as her effort to keep one last tie to Roger-even though she's keeping it secret from him.

    "Forever is composed of nows." Emily Dickinson

    by Leftovers on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 08:37:16 AM PDT

  •  I love Mad Men (0+ / 0-)

    and I had a very strong hunch that Joan didn't go through with the abortion, however since I hadn't seen this episode yet I'm a little unhappy that you didn't have a "spoiler" warning at the top of your diary.

    It kind of destroys the dramatic effect, ya know?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site