Skip to main content

The midterms are headed into the final two weeks of the campaigns, and the candidates are beginning their sprint for the finish line. In Texas Congressional District 17 that means we are going to see a blitz of television advertisements, and next week Democratic Congressman Chet Edwards will debate Republican challenger Bill Flores twice. The Bryan-College Station Eagle reported this week that both candidates are making their final pitch to the voters, and they are both going to be campaigning quite heavily in the district. The campaign for District 17 exemplifies the overall campaign during the midterms, as Democrats like Edwards have chosen to focus on local issues, while the Republicans like Flores have focused on making the election about national issues. Both parties have decided to follow the conventional wisdom. In stead of campaign on actually policy ideas the Republicans have campaigned as the opposition party, and have provided no real alternative. The Democrats have campaigned on their disagreements with the Obama Administration instead of campaigning on their legislative achievements.

Many of the major political observers are projecting the edge to Flores in the campaign, and Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight projects that Flores has a 95% chance of defeating Edwards. Real Clear Politics, CQ Politics, and the Cook Political Report all have the race leaning Republican, but I wouldn’t call this race for Flores just yet. First of all there has been no real public opinion polling in this campaign, with the exception of internal polling which generally favor the campaign conducting the poll. Edwards also has history on his side. He has defeated three straight Republican challengers, and actually fairs better in midterm elections than he does in Presidential election years. That being said, this is a seriously tough year for Democrats in any district. Let alone a district in which President Obama only received about 35% of the vote in during the 2008 election. In many ways this is Flores’ campaign to lose.

How might Flores lose this campaign? Well, he might get a headache. Last week Flores said that he was “not philosophically opposed” to raising the Social Security retirement age for future recipients, and the Dallas Morning News reported on Flores’ attempt to walk back that comment while saying that he had a “headache during the interview and the remarks did not properly characterize his position.” Political reported on Edwards’ response saying that “after Bill Flores blamed his position on raising the Social Security age to 70 on a 'headache,' what is next?" Is Mr. Flores going to blame his plan to privatize VA health care on a Dairy Queen Hunger-Buster and blame his company’s having stuck taxpayers with $7.5 million in unpaid government loans to a case of indigestion?” Of the two campaigns Edwards has been fair more disciplined and less prone to gaffs than the Flores’ campaign. However, in a political year when you can say as many outlandish things as Sharon Angle has said in Nevada and still be tied with Democratic Majority Lead Harry Reid, mistakes are not as much as a political liability that they would be in other years.

On of the measures being used to judge campaigns is the involvement of the national parties, and how much money the Democrat and Republican Senatorial and Congressional campaign committees are putting in place in different districts and states. There has been a buzz on the conservative blogs and Twitter that the DCCC was going to pull money from District 17 and send it to other places. Newsweek reported that Edwards would get few add buys, characterizing it as “bad news for Edwards, who's been one of the highest-profile Democrats to run away from the president and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, actively denouncing them in campaign ads.” However, the Texas Tribune reported today that the DCCC released a new ad attacking Flores for the bailout that a oil company he managed during bankruptcy received from the federal government costing the taxpayers $7.5 million.

To all of those Republicans working on the math to try and figure out what size seat majority you will have in the House of Representatives, and to all those Democrats feeling a bit demoralized by the way this election season has gone: just remember that nothing is as certain as it seems. What people tend to forget about is that midterm elections are decided in a district by district basis, and polling for the vast majority of even competitive campaigns is scarce at best. While it does appear that the Republicans will gain control of the majority in the House, they will probably not be able to gain control of the majority in the Senate. One more thing. While Democrats have become famous for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, the Republicans nominated a candidate that was the first person to have to campaign on not being a witch since the 1600’s. Anything can happen this year.

Political and Social Thought...
to the Left of College Station

Originally posted to Left of Aggieland on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 07:09 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    •  anything can happen is right! (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      BlackSheep1, LiberalTexan, sturunner

      including the Texas Rangers beating the Yankees in NY!

    •  LiberalTexan, out here in Lubbock news of (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Odysseus, LiberalTexan, peachcreek

      the Bryan-College Station paper's endorsement of Bill White is very nearly as jaw-droppingly joyful as news of the AJ's endorsement -- the most red-meat Republican paper in Texas split its ticket yesterday, endorsing Bill White atop a list of GOP candidates.

      Congratulations on having a paper with editorial thought capabilities.

      LBJ & Lady Bird, Sully Sullenberger, Molly Ivins, Barbara Jordan, Ann Richards, Drew Brees: Texas is No Bush League! -7.50,-5.59

      by BlackSheep1 on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 10:51:18 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  There are only TWO papers of any note (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        BlackSheep1, LiberalTexan

        which have endorsed Perry, and one of them rather reluctantly.  I think it was Midland and one other (see Burnt Orange Report).  The only holdout as of today is the Fort Worth Starle-Gram, with no endorsement yet.  I'm guessing they'll go for Perry, but even the DaMN endorsed White, so who knows.

        Thanks for the diary, for a LITTLE attention for Texas, which is getting so little here or elsewhere.

        Torture is Wrong! We live near W so you don't have to. Send love.

        by tom 47 on Wed Oct 20, 2010 at 09:39:21 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  chet edwards' seat... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    LiberalTexan, peachcreek

    deserves to be up for grabs. his voting record is way too blue and he's NO FRIEND of the glbt-community.

    "A time comes when silence is betrayal." ~ MLK, Jr...Where has CANDIDATE Obama gone?

    by liberaldemdave on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 08:01:32 PM PDT

    •  I assume... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      liberaldemdave, peachcreek

      You mean his record is way to red? And he does not have a acceptable record on equality issues, specifically his vote against the repeal of DADT.

      Political and Social Thought...
      to the Left of College Station

      by LiberalTexan on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 08:20:41 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  CRUD! yes...i was thinking "blue dog"... (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        LiberalTexan, peachcreek

        ...while typing.

        not just his dadt vote, but his vote on any legislation of importance to the democratic wing of the democratic party.

        i was demonized on a mailing list of some 9000 texas democrats (you'll know the list by the reference) for calling out mr. edwards' failures to represent the democratic party and its platform.

        "A time comes when silence is betrayal." ~ MLK, Jr...Where has CANDIDATE Obama gone?

        by liberaldemdave on Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 09:34:35 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  But realistically.... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Odysseus, LiberalTexan

      Where does Bill Flores stand on LGBT issues?? I haven't followed this too closely, but wasn't Chet the subject of some serious gerrymandering? And wasn't it surprising that he won, given the circumstances? I think the Partisan Voting Index for TX-17 is in the high teens for Repubs. Is it really that surprising that he tended toward the center-right? I'm not excusing it, I wish he had voted differently too. But is it forgivable given the makeup of his district? I won't condemn him yet...

      •  "wasn't Chet the subject of some gerrymandering?" (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        peachcreek, that would be EVERY ONE OF THE 32 SEATS in TEXAS!!!

        Remember 2003, Tom DeLay (not even a state official), and Tom Craddick, then-Speaker of the Texas House of REpresentatives?  Rick Perry called the Leg back in to session THREE TIMES so they could re-draw the Congressional district map, and  even the Bush DOJ couldn't stomach it without one final adjustment.  

        No, Chet was not the only member of Congress whose seat was gerrymandered - - the ENTIRE state is currently JIGGERED!

        Keep pluggin'...

        Torture is Wrong! We live near W so you don't have to. Send love.

        by tom 47 on Wed Oct 20, 2010 at 09:43:21 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Yes (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Chet Edwards is a democrat representing the highest republican margin anywhere in the country. Some of his votes I disagree with, but he does great things for this district.

    Hopefully we can chalk up Mr. Flores to the Wohlgeumuth's and the Taylor's of campaign's past.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site