I rarely have the stomach to peruse right-wing blogs. But, I was curious to find out what their thoughts were about Virginia Thomas' olive branch gesture (unfortunately they typically see Anita Hill as a liar, but at least the majority seem to agree that it was out of line AND even shared the speculation that she must have been drunk!).
Anyway, I learned something else of interest. Obama has, for the third time in a month, made reference to a passage from the Declaration of Independence with one GLARING omission:
"... all men are created equal, they are endowed with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness..."
Did you catch it?
For those of you lacking in your proper historical knowledge, there must be a Creator that does the endowing.
Barack Hussein Obama is a FOREIGN ATHEIST MUSLIM SOCIALIST MARXIST COMMUNIST!!!!!!
Can you believe the audacity that the MESSIAH has to rewrite history and trample the 'constitution' like this???!!!
What I find curious is that the president did this three times in the past month, so it is intentional.
And why would he intentionally omit an (arguably) inconsequential part of the nation's founding document that proclaimed individual Rights of equality, Life, Liberty, and pursuit of Happiness? The only reason I can come up with is because it exposes the tea partiers et. al. as paranoid, ignorant, intolerant, hateful Christian extremists.
http://cnsnews.com/...
When asked why the president did not use the words "endowed by their Creator" in his Monday speech, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Tuesday, "I haven't seen the comments, Lester. But I can assure you the president believes in the Declaration of Independence.”
Oh, really, Mr. Gibbs (if that is your real name)?
Then why are real Christian Americans saying this:
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...
He is the ANTI-CHRIST (liar in chief of the world) and is going to go DOWN. Mark my words. He is going to be exposed so bad, all we have to do is just pop the popcorn.
Thankfully, cooler heads may have prevailed
the anti-Christ won’t be as incompetent as Obama has been so he’s not the anti-Christ – at least not yet. Obama’s reign is suffering badly though which could be interpreted as the sword wound referred to in Revelation. The anti-Christ won’t rise to ultimate power until he makes a deal with the Devil – the deal that the Devil tried to make with Christ after His baptism (Mat 4:8-9).
Then again, Militant Conservative makes a point
HIS creator is not OUR creator. plain and simple. He is of the tribe of ishmael the first son of abraham but the non blessed of abraham. Piss off you muzterd lover, your the afterbirth of christianity no more no less. You will always suck hide teet and be unworthy.
The lord has designated your place quite clearly. powder is dry.
Something I hadn't considered
That phrase is probably not in the Kenyan declaration of independence. I’ve said it before, he’s an alien president from an alien culture. No person named Hussein or Obama has any kinship to those who authored the Declaration. Why would he give a tinkers Damn for those men or their recorded history? Our founding documents may as well have been written in Sanskrit or hieroglyphs for all the attention men named Hussein will ever pay them.
And also
Did you notice how he paused for a long period after. This was to illicit a response. He toys with the American people the way, a serial killer toys with his victims. He is a stealth Jihadist psychopath.
I encourage you to browse through some of these sites. It really makes me wonder how many Americans think like this. Forty-something percent of Republicans actually think he's a muslim if I'm not mistaken. And there seems to be a strong correlation between republicans/teapartiers/'christians'/intolerance/hate/paranoia... and even violence to these ends.
http://townhall.com/...
Obama is a true believer in big government control over the actions and will of the populace. The constitution is the only damn thing in his way along with a growing majority that are rejecting that notion!
Someone needs to cap that fool!
Yep. This poster's contribution to the discussion of why Obama omitted mention of a creator who has (somehow) endowed us with the aforementioned inalienable rights is that he ought to be assassinated.
I'm curious if anyone else has a different take on it.