Ok. Dont like her views. Dont think she will win. Extreme. Bible-thumper. Etc.
But when someone is unfairly slandered in public, and its an unfair attack, she's entitled to some support.
And what Gawker did is really sad...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
http://gawker.com/...
Christine had a "ONS" (kinda) with someone a few years ago. Except she didnt have actual sex. So it wasnt a real ONS. Except that was the headline, along with sordid details about her alleged grooming habits.
Yes, some of you may think this is "ok" because she is running for office. Or perhaps its because she is a "virgin". Or any number of reasons...
Except this douche was paid for his article. And elected to remain Anonymous. So he can trash her...but he gets to stay cloaked behind the scenes?
This is, IMHO an improper sexual attack on Christine. And, you know, such stuff can get people to have sympathy for her. Even when they dont agree with her views.
Its too bad this type of trash is practiced. Whether liberal or conservative, no one should have this type of october surprise sprung on them.
Oh..and apparently he's no longer Anonymous...
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/...